Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Chiefs v Blues

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
chiefsblues
115 Posts 31 Posters 3.1k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mr Fish
    wrote on last edited by
    #105

    Nock can't kick, Christie can't pass. It's a tough world.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • M Mr Fish

      Nock can't kick, Christie can't pass. It's a tough world.

      A Offline
      A Offline
      African Monkey
      wrote on last edited by
      #106

      @Mr-Fish said in Chiefs v Blues:

      Nock can't kick, Christie can't pass. It's a tough world.

      I wouldn't say Nock can't kick. He's got a big box kick. Just tends to overcook his kicks sometimes.

      taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • A African Monkey

        @Mr-Fish said in Chiefs v Blues:

        Nock can't kick, Christie can't pass. It's a tough world.

        I wouldn't say Nock can't kick. He's got a big box kick. Just tends to overcook his kicks sometimes.

        taniwharugbyT Offline
        taniwharugbyT Offline
        taniwharugby
        wrote on last edited by
        #107

        @African-Monkey yea he certainly has a.kicking game, but like most of his game, inconsistent.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • nzzpN Offline
          nzzpN Offline
          nzzp
          wrote on last edited by
          #108

          Crikey!

          https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/chiefs-fined-for-conversion-interference-during-super-rugby-pacific-win-over-blues/YUXCQEOT2ZFW5B6RNGHVGXDZWY/

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            Machpants
            wrote on last edited by
            #109

            That should be a points loss, disgusting

            nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
            4
            • M Machpants

              That should be a points loss, disgusting

              nzzpN Offline
              nzzpN Offline
              nzzp
              wrote on last edited by
              #110

              @Machpants said in Chiefs v Blues:

              That should be a points loss, disgusting

              You can't ding the team for that. The individual should lose pitchside privileges for some time though - it's a muppet thing to do... twice!

              M antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
              1
              • nzzpN nzzp

                @Machpants said in Chiefs v Blues:

                That should be a points loss, disgusting

                You can't ding the team for that. The individual should lose pitchside privileges for some time though - it's a muppet thing to do... twice!

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Machpants
                wrote on last edited by
                #111

                @nzzp said in Chiefs v Blues:

                @Machpants said in Chiefs v Blues:

                That should be a points loss, disgusting

                You can't ding the team for that. The individual should lose pitchside privileges for some time though - it's a muppet thing to do... twice!

                Disagree, they're part of the team. It affected the game, and it's cheating.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • DuluthD Offline
                  DuluthD Offline
                  Duluth
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #112

                  I looked at the footage. You can't see the incidents because they are showing replays. But you can tell that the trainer had to move a decent distance to get to the ball, particularly the second time

                  I hope they checked previous matches too

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • YeetyaahY Online
                    YeetyaahY Online
                    Yeetyaah
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #113

                    Some supreme shithousery really. But is what it is and the club has been fined.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • BonesB Offline
                      BonesB Offline
                      Bones
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #114

                      Dick thing to do and I wouldn't be against it being reclassified as a loss for the chiefs... but I don't really understand players getting rid of the ball post try anyway, so lesson learned on both sides.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • nzzpN nzzp

                        @Machpants said in Chiefs v Blues:

                        That should be a points loss, disgusting

                        You can't ding the team for that. The individual should lose pitchside privileges for some time though - it's a muppet thing to do... twice!

                        antipodeanA Offline
                        antipodeanA Offline
                        antipodean
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #115

                        @nzzp said in Chiefs v Blues:

                        @Machpants said in Chiefs v Blues:

                        That should be a points loss, disgusting

                        You can't ding the team for that. The individual should lose pitchside privileges for some time though - it's a muppet thing to do... twice!

                        The rot starts at the top: “We have co-operated fully with Sanzaar on this matter and accept responsibility for the technical breach and the outcome of this process,” Graafhuis said. “As this is an employment matter, we will not be making any further comment.”

                        What a great catch-all comment that is as practically everything can be considered an employment matter.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Search
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Search