Blues v Crusaders
-
@Duluth said in Blues v Crusaders:
@Nogusta said in Blues v Crusaders:
@Duluth said in Blues v Crusaders:
"Suafoa isn't listed as injured so I guess he comes onto the bench"
Suafoa is not available either
Well that makes things difficult. The only other lock option in the squad is starting at 6. Pick another loosie and have no specialist locks on the bench?
Any other locks training with the squad?
Is this the situation that they can get a loan player from one of the other franchise WTG’s?
-
@Bones said in Blues v Crusaders:
@Canes4life said in Blues v Crusaders:
The fact Springer scored half of Lowe's career tally in one game proves my point that Springer is more than just 'slightly' better than Lowe.
The fact that you believe the amount of tries a player scored in one demolition of the opposition, without taking any context into consideration, makes your argument as weak as Jonah Lowe scoring 4 tries against one opposition.
Springer has scored 13 tries in 19 games which equates to a 68% strike rate and he's only 22. Yes, he scored five tries in one game but considering that was his first appearance of the season, it can't be underestimated. Lowe would have fluffed half the opportunities Springer had over the weekend because as we all know, he's just not that good.
Lowe, in his 8th season with 10 tries has a 26% strike rate but apparently Springer is only slightly better than Lowe.
Real good argument from you.
-
@Nogusta said in Blues v Crusaders:
Suafoa will be on the bench tonight
And how about tomorrow night
-
@george33 said in Blues v Crusaders:
@Landers92 Be no 1 left by Saturday.
This has a Blues / Eden Park ambush written all over it.
-
@ACT-Crusader said in Blues v Crusaders:
@george33 said in Blues v Crusaders:
@Landers92 Be no 1 left by Saturday.
This has a Blues / Eden Park ambush written all over it.
Crusaders by a thousand!
-
@george33 said in Blues v Crusaders:
@Landers92 Matt Moulds ? Really
Yes, he's been with them for a few weeks
-
@Landers92 said in Blues v Crusaders:
Codie Taylor ruled out for this week. Moananu starts and Matt Moulds comes on to the bench
That's big. Crusaders pack is a different animal with Codie for some reason.
-
@Canes4life said in Blues v Crusaders:
Springer is only slightly better than Lowe.
Real good argument from you.
Bingo, you got there! If as you say, tries and percentages are all that matters, a guy that had run in 8 tries from 18 games with all those opportunities is a slight upgrade on Lowe for the highlanders.
Good to know the metric of what makes a super awesome player though. Caleb Ralph >>> Jane, etc.
-
@Bones said in Blues v Crusaders:
@Canes4life said in Blues v Crusaders:
Springer is only slightly better than Lowe.
Real good argument from you.
Bingo, you got there! If as you say, tries and percentages are all that matters, a guy that had run in 8 tries from 18 games with all those opportunities is a slight upgrade on Lowe for the highlanders.
Good to know the metric of what makes a super awesome player though. Caleb Ralph >>> Jane, etc.
Lol manipulating the quote so you could curate some sort of response. Good on yah.
-
@Canes4life said in Blues v Crusaders:
@Bones said in Blues v Crusaders:
@Canes4life said in Blues v Crusaders:
Springer is only slightly better than Lowe.
Real good argument from you.
Bingo, you got there! If as you say, tries and percentages are all that matters, a guy that had run in 8 tries from 18 games with all those opportunities is a slight upgrade on Lowe for the highlanders.
Good to know the metric of what makes a super awesome player though. Caleb Ralph >>> Jane, etc.
Lol manipulating the quote so you could curate some sort of response. Good on yah.
Seriously good to know Lomu wasn't a patch on Reece.
-
@Bones said in Blues v Crusaders:
@Canes4life said in Blues v Crusaders:
@Bones said in Blues v Crusaders:
@Canes4life said in Blues v Crusaders:
Springer is only slightly better than Lowe.
Real good argument from you.
Bingo, you got there! If as you say, tries and percentages are all that matters, a guy that had run in 8 tries from 18 games with all those opportunities is a slight upgrade on Lowe for the highlanders.
Good to know the metric of what makes a super awesome player though. Caleb Ralph >>> Jane, etc.
Lol manipulating the quote so you could curate some sort of response. Good on yah.
Seriously good to know Lomu wasn't a patch on Reece.
You’re missing the point. Everyone knows Springer is a much better player just by watching him. He’s already showed at the raw age of 22 that he’s a far superior athlete to Lowe. What the stats show is how poor Lowe has been over a long period of time, yet Springer is pretty much still a kid and he already has a far better try scoring record.
The fact you are trying to make a case for the very mediocre Jonah Lowe is laughable.
Anyway, I’m wasting my breath on this. Just nonsense from you.
-
@Canes4life said in Blues v Crusaders:
@Bones said in Blues v Crusaders:
@Canes4life said in Blues v Crusaders:
@Bones said in Blues v Crusaders:
@Canes4life said in Blues v Crusaders:
Springer is only slightly better than Lowe.
Real good argument from you.
Bingo, you got there! If as you say, tries and percentages are all that matters, a guy that had run in 8 tries from 18 games with all those opportunities is a slight upgrade on Lowe for the highlanders.
Good to know the metric of what makes a super awesome player though. Caleb Ralph >>> Jane, etc.
Lol manipulating the quote so you could curate some sort of response. Good on yah.
Seriously good to know Lomu wasn't a patch on Reece.
The fact you are trying to make a case for the very mediocre Jonah Lowe is laughable.
Anyway, I’m wasting my breath on this. Just nonsense from you.
All these "facts" that you make up when it's just poor comprehension and fantasy really don't help. Go back and start again. For the highlanders, Springer would be a slight upgrade on Lowe - a half decent fill in as opposed to a very mediocre full in, but not going to oust anyone from the starting side. No one is going to give two shits if Springer doesn't sign with the highlanders.
Nonsense is blahing on about trying scoring and using the word "fact" to state something that is anything but a fact.