• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

QF Chiefs v Blues

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
chiefsblues
587 Posts 53 Posters 1.8k Views
QF Chiefs v Blues
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    African Monkey
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #575

    @gt12 said in QF Chiefs v Blues:

    @African-Monkey said in QF Chiefs v Blues:

    @Duluth said in QF Chiefs v Blues:

    @Chris-B said in QF Chiefs v Blues:

    If it's only 50-50, I reckon you're better off kicking for the corner, expecting you'll either be able to score a try or get a better penalty shot at goal - and winding more time off the clock with the Blues pinned

    Yes, if they had a functioning lineout

    Yeah people forget that the Chiefs lineout was a mess.

    That's not true.

    Even taking that into account (running at about 70% which is terrible), we should have gone for the corner. The kick was a far lower percentage play than a line out, and we would have kept them deep in their half off set piece, at a minimum.

    I'm prepared to die on this hill.

    Fair enough. I personally thought it was the right decision to go for 3 but I do see the other side of the argument to it.

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to African Monkey on last edited by
    #576

    @African-Monkey said in QF Chiefs v Blues:

    @Duluth said in QF Chiefs v Blues:

    @Chris-B said in QF Chiefs v Blues:

    If it's only 50-50, I reckon you're better off kicking for the corner, expecting you'll either be able to score a try or get a better penalty shot at goal - and winding more time off the clock with the Blues pinned

    Yes, if they had a functioning lineout

    Yeah people forget that the Chiefs lineout was a mess.

    That's a worry given so many of their forwards are ABs or in the frame.

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to African Monkey on last edited by
    #577

    @African-Monkey

    Can't give you an upvote, but I can appreciate why it was considered the right idea.

    From my feeling, we had had no ball and little territory and were exiting terribly (which is not like us at all this year).

    It felt to me like we needed to go win the game.

    Although I understand the idea to take the 3 across the game, I personally thought we should have gone for it more because every time it was telling the Blues that their defence was working.

    We never broke them down and were always at risk of giving up points when they were in our half.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by
    #578

    @nostrildamus said in QF Chiefs v Blues:

    @African-Monkey said in QF Chiefs v Blues:

    @Duluth said in QF Chiefs v Blues:

    @Chris-B said in QF Chiefs v Blues:

    If it's only 50-50, I reckon you're better off kicking for the corner, expecting you'll either be able to score a try or get a better penalty shot at goal - and winding more time off the clock with the Blues pinned

    Yes, if they had a functioning lineout

    Yeah people forget that the Chiefs lineout was a mess.

    That's a worry given so many of their forwards are ABs or in the frame.

    Did you watch the game?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    wrote on last edited by
    #579

    No, and feel free to lambast me. Just going off what the previous poster said about lineouts. Are you saying their lineouts weren't a mess?

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by
    #580

    @nostrildamus said in QF Chiefs v Blues:

    No, and feel free to lambast me. Just going off what the previous poster said about lineouts. Are you saying their lineouts weren't a mess?

    Injuries all over the place fucked them up and we finished with a bunch of hybrids on the park and a midfielder packing the scrum at 6.
    Lord lasted all of 5 minutes.
    It was a fucking mess.

    BovidaeB B nostrildamusN 3 Replies Last reply
    3
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #581

    @gt12 said in QF Chiefs v Blues:

    Injuries all over the place fucked them up and we finished with a bunch of hybrids on the park and a midfielder packing the scrum at 6.
    Lord lasted all of 5 minutes.
    It was a fucking mess.

    I haven't read the thread but this game showed how sorely missed Jacobson was. He is a quality defender and puts pressure on the opposition at the breakdown by winning turnovers. Just as importantly, it completely stuffed up the loose forward rotation when Parker limped off as Boshier had already been subbed. Normally, one of Parker or Finau would have been replaced by Sititi.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    brodean
    replied to gt12 on last edited by brodean
    #582

    @gt12 said in QF Chiefs v Blues:

    @nostrildamus said in QF Chiefs v Blues:

    No, and feel free to lambast me. Just going off what the previous poster said about lineouts. Are you saying their lineouts weren't a mess?

    Injuries all over the place fucked them up and we finished with a bunch of hybrids on the park and a midfielder packing the scrum at 6.
    Lord lasted all of 5 minutes.
    It was a fucking mess.

    The lineout was a mess multiple times when Taukei'aho, Vaa'i, Ah Kuoi, Parker and Finau were all on the field together before the injuries.

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to gt12 on last edited by nostrildamus
    #583

    @gt12 said in QF Chiefs v Blues:

    @nostrildamus said in QF Chiefs v Blues:

    No, and feel free to lambast me. Just going off what the previous poster said about lineouts. Are you saying their lineouts weren't a mess?

    Injuries all over the place fucked them up and we finished with a bunch of hybrids on the park and a midfielder packing the scrum at 6.
    Lord lasted all of 5 minutes.
    It was a fucking mess.

    I see, thank you.
    I am concerned about the ABs lineout (and not against Chiefs per se) as I thought our lineout improved in the late Foster era then started struggling under Razor/Ryan (I thought we started well against the English but I may have the order of games wrong). And Super Rugby doesn't seem a very useful gauge of lineout skill for those of us (like me) who only have time to see a few games before we head back into the international season.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to brodean on last edited by
    #584

    @brodean said in QF Chiefs v Blues:

    @gt12 said in QF Chiefs v Blues:

    @nostrildamus said in QF Chiefs v Blues:

    No, and feel free to lambast me. Just going off what the previous poster said about lineouts. Are you saying their lineouts weren't a mess?

    Injuries all over the place fucked them up and we finished with a bunch of hybrids on the park and a midfielder packing the scrum at 6.
    Lord lasted all of 5 minutes.
    It was a fucking mess.

    The lineout was a mess multiple times when Taukei'aho, Vaa'i, Ah Kuoi, Parker and Finau were all on the field together before the injuries.

    Can't argue with that, but that's the huge weakness of starting with two hybrids at lock. Especially against that Blues team who are excellent at contesting - both Pat T and McWHannel are great at it and McWhannel probably knows the Chiefs systems and calls too.

    For us, when Vaii is paired alongside a real lineout operator, we do better. We missed Lord who hopefully could have come on and sorted things out a bit.

    I'm also not convinced that we put out our best lifters (probably Norris?). Overall, the idea to finish strongly got well fucked up with the injury to Jacobson (reduced our starting strength) and Lord etc.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #585

    The final sequence. Strong carries from Papalii and Sotutu in the lead up.

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #586

    @Tim If Papalii put on 5kg, he could turn himself into a bastard of a blindside.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #587

    @frugby said in QF Chiefs v Blues:

    @Tim If Papalii put on 5kg, he could turn himself into a bastard of a blindside.

    I always assumed long tern he'd be a 6 so was surprised when he specialised at 7, but I guess it was the best way for the Blues to keep their best loosies on the park.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

QF Chiefs v Blues
Rugby Matches
chiefsblues
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.