Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

SF Crusaders v Blues

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusadersblues
524 Posts 57 Posters 13.2k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

    @brodean said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

    @KiwiMurph said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

    Fihaki had a couple of nice long passes too.

    With his defense and distribution he's more suited to 13 or 15. He offers nothing on attack on the wing.

    Not sure about defence. He has had real issues on defence this year.

    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by ACT Crusader
    #511

    @KiwiMurph said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

    @brodean said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

    @KiwiMurph said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

    Fihaki had a couple of nice long passes too.

    With his defense and distribution he's more suited to 13 or 15. He offers nothing on attack on the wing.

    Not sure about defence. He has had real issues on defence this year.

    Teams have attacked down his side because he more often than not comes in when he shouldn’t. Hasn’t used the sideline to his advantage either. Not a natural winger and it has shown. Closer in he is more than physical enough but you’d want to see him get a decent NPC campaign in there.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

      @KiwiMurph said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

      @brodean said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

      @KiwiMurph said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

      Fihaki had a couple of nice long passes too.

      With his defense and distribution he's more suited to 13 or 15. He offers nothing on attack on the wing.

      Not sure about defence. He has had real issues on defence this year.

      Teams have attacked down his side because he more often than not comes in when he shouldn’t. Hasn’t used the sideline to his advantage either. Not a natural winger and it has shown. Closer in he is more than physical enough but you’d want to see him get a decent NPC campaign in there.

      canefanC Offline
      canefanC Offline
      canefan
      wrote on last edited by canefan
      #512

      @ACT-Crusader said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

      @KiwiMurph said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

      @brodean said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

      @KiwiMurph said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

      Fihaki had a couple of nice long passes too.

      With his defense and distribution he's more suited to 13 or 15. He offers nothing on attack on the wing.

      Not sure about defence. He has had real issues on defence this year.

      Teams have attacked down his side because he more often than not comes in when he shouldn’t. Hasn’t used the sideline to his advantage either. Not a natural winger and it has shown. Closer in he is more than physical enough but you’d want to see him get a decent NPC campaign in there.

      So he's not a natural winger but will probably be selected to the ABs as a .... winger 🤦🤷

      1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • B Away
        B Away
        brodean
        wrote on last edited by
        #513

        There's no way he should be near an AB squad. Bring back Ralph.

        canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • H Offline
          H Offline
          hikastags
          wrote on last edited by
          #514

          He shouldn't be close to the AB squad. Crusaders will still miss him next week.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            SBW1
            wrote on last edited by
            #515

            What is big Tamaiti's status for the final?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B brodean

              There's no way he should be near an AB squad. Bring back Ralph.

              canefanC Offline
              canefanC Offline
              canefan
              wrote on last edited by
              #516

              @brodean said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

              There's no way he should be near an AB squad. Bring back Ralph.

              I hope Razor is listening

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Steven Harris

                Having met Rob Penny on a couple of occasions in the past I found him a really decent type and it comes through when he’s being interviewed very humble and respectful
                Man he copped some unwanted some attention about his coaching credentials this time last year and it’s fair to say he’s answered his critics big time
                So I’m actually quite wrapt for the guy , he’s 80 minutes away from carving his own piece of history or dare I say some unwanted history given the 31-0 knockout record
                Regardless for mine he’s done a superb job

                sparkyS Offline
                sparkyS Offline
                sparky
                wrote on last edited by
                #517

                @Steven-Harris The Crusaders are a well-coached and well-led outfit this year.

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • H hikastags

                  Has anyone heard anything about Newell? He went down clutching his knee/leg in the last 5mins.

                  Pretty incredible he played 80mins...

                  Crazy HorseC Offline
                  Crazy HorseC Offline
                  Crazy Horse
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #518

                  @hikastags said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

                  Has anyone heard anything about Newell? He went down clutching his knee/leg in the last 5mins.

                  Pretty incredible he played 80mins...

                  I noticed that too. Was down for a while and looked in a fair amount of pain, but when he got up he didn't appear to limp. Will be a massive loss if he is out along with Williams.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • Daffy JaffyD Offline
                    Daffy JaffyD Offline
                    Daffy Jaffy
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #519

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • Landers92L Landers92

                      Dumb by sotutu but this ref really needs to let things go a bit

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      pakman
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #520

                      @Landers92 said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

                      Dumb by sotutu but this ref really needs to let things go a bit

                      Shalfoon bought that with a nudge to Ta'Avao's noggin.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                        @Bones said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

                        Wasn't that knocked on?

                        Would very much have liked another look

                        P Offline
                        P Offline
                        pakman
                        wrote on last edited by pakman
                        #521

                        @KiwiMurph said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

                        @Bones said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

                        Wasn't that knocked on?

                        Would very much have liked another look

                        I finally got round to taking another look.

                        The TMO mysteriously didn't check the grounding.

                        It looked to me that it squirted forward out of WJ's hands but he forced it very slightly after it bounced.

                        Right in front of Doleman, who saw no reason to double check.

                        It was only a knock out final after all.

                        Dan54D P 2 Replies Last reply
                        5
                        • P pakman

                          @KiwiMurph said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

                          @Bones said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

                          Wasn't that knocked on?

                          Would very much have liked another look

                          I finally got round to taking another look.

                          The TMO mysteriously didn't check the grounding.

                          It looked to me that it squirted forward out of WJ's hands but he forced it very slightly after it bounced.

                          Right in front of Doleman, who saw no reason to double check.

                          It was only a knock out final after all.

                          Dan54D Away
                          Dan54D Away
                          Dan54
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #522

                          @pakman said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

                          @KiwiMurph said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

                          @Bones said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

                          Wasn't that knocked on?

                          Would very much have liked another look

                          I finally got round to taking another look.

                          The TMO mysteriously didn't check the grounding.

                          It looked to me that it squirted forward out of WJ's hands but he forced it very slightly after it bounced.

                          Right in front of Doleman, who saw no reason to double check.

                          It was only a knock out final after all.

                          I think you will find TMO always does a check, why sometimes they alert ref if they see problem.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • P pakman

                            @KiwiMurph said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

                            @Bones said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

                            Wasn't that knocked on?

                            Would very much have liked another look

                            I finally got round to taking another look.

                            The TMO mysteriously didn't check the grounding.

                            It looked to me that it squirted forward out of WJ's hands but he forced it very slightly after it bounced.

                            Right in front of Doleman, who saw no reason to double check.

                            It was only a knock out final after all.

                            P Offline
                            P Offline
                            pakman
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #523

                            @pakman said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

                            @KiwiMurph said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

                            @Bones said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

                            Wasn't that knocked on?

                            Would very much have liked another look

                            I finally got round to taking another look.

                            The TMO mysteriously didn't check the grounding.

                            It looked to me that it squirted forward out of WJ's hands but he forced it very slightly after it bounced.

                            Right in front of Doleman, who saw no reason to double check.

                            It was only a knock out final after all.

                            Repeat in Lion v Pumas match, but TMO overruled a missed knock on right in front of his nose.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                              Fusitia gone

                              I thought he was lucky not to get done earlier I thought

                              P Offline
                              P Offline
                              pakman
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #524

                              @KiwiMurph said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

                              Fusitia gone

                              I thought he was lucky not to get done earlier I thought

                              This was the crux of the game. Watched replay last night. Fusitua didn’t advance. Barrett lunged forward suddenly leading with head.

                              The physics was that Barrett butted Fusitua.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Search
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Search