• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Final - Crusaders v Chiefs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusaderschiefs
917 Posts 75 Posters 3.8k Views
Final - Crusaders v Chiefs
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to tubbyj on last edited by
    #875

    @tubbyj

    He absolutely dominated the air in the final. Did get nailed behind the line a couple of times, but most players would have succumbed to those Tupaea rush defence efforts.

    He might well be ready to match his brilliant attacking lines with the rest of his game.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to tubbyj on last edited by
    #876

    @tubbyj said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Will Jordan was the difference. Should have been given man of the match. When he went off injured in the round robin match at that stadium a few weeks back the Crusaders went to pieces and dropped or lost every contestable kick, Mackenzie and Stevenson dominated with the boot and grew in confidence. In the final Jordan just took them both out of the game and his leadership seemed to rub off on Rivez Reihana as well.

    I think he has really turned a corner in maturity and leadership this season and I am looking forward to that playing out for the All Blacks. Hopefully he can stay injury free and play the entire test season.

    Reihana's leadership rubbed off on Jordan.

    @Crazy-Horse

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #877

    @Tim said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @tubbyj

    He absolutely dominated the air in the final. Did get nailed behind the line a couple of times, but most players would have succumbed to those Tupaea rush defence efforts.

    He might well be ready to match his brilliant attacking lines with the rest of his game.

    I'd still like to see him create space from something other than Barrett inherited mabo, as well as link in space. But he looks a gazillion times more reliable than a year ago and is starting to look like Smith sans distribution.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    wrote on last edited by
    #878

    I still like Norris as a running prop off the bench. I wonder if the Chiefs locks are good at supporting in the scrum. Compared to Crusaders locks anyway.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #879

    Well done, lads!

    Well done, Rob.

    I think I was calling for your head this time last year, because I couldn't see how you'd be good enough to coach us to a title.

    Wasn't very optimistic about this match, but we (well rob and his boys) found the answers at the scrum, the kicking game and in the air. Not quite so much with the kick-off receipts (especially) and the lineout.

    Pretty even first half, but largely controlled the second half, without managing to get the try or two they were pressing for.

    Commiserations to the Chiefs and supporters.

    1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #880

    I missed the game due to family commitments, just caught the highlights, and want to offer Chiefs fans my commiserations for having to endure both TJ and Justin Marshall in the commentary box for that one.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    11
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    wrote on last edited by
    #881

    Even more of a Hugh performance by Fletcher Newell going the whole 80 minutes considering he played the whole game with a grade-two MCL injury.
    He injured his knee in the Blues SF.
    Probably will put Newell out of the French series.

    SnowyS P antipodeanA 3 Replies Last reply
    5
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #882

    @Chris said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Probably will put Newell out of the French series.

    Which would make playing 80 minutes yesterday a stupid decision. Or, priorities are very different from what mine would be. A shame that he might miss out.

    Then again maybe he felt that he had to play to get into the AB team?

    WTF do I know, I'm just posting to let people know that I'm still alive.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    11
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #883

    @No-Quarter said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    I missed the game due to family commitments, just caught the highlights, and want to offer Chiefs fans my commiserations for having to endure both TJ and Justin Marshall in the commentary box for that one.

    Would rather TJ and Justin than the Aussie rabble we got.

    I don't mind Maloney as a commentator but was it 100% necessary to have Aus comms for an all NZ game?

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #884

    @Snowy love it bro.

    Newell’s play along side Bell and Bower was pretty important at the end and it showed with the scrum dominance. The drop off beyond our 3 ABs is still a little more than you’d want in such a big game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to booboo on last edited by ACT Crusader
    #885

    @booboo said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @No-Quarter said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    I missed the game due to family commitments, just caught the highlights, and want to offer Chiefs fans my commiserations for having to endure both TJ and Justin Marshall in the commentary box for that one.

    Would rather TJ and Justin than the Aussie rabble we got.

    I don't mind Maloney as a commentator but was it 100% necessary to have Aus comms for an all NZ game?

    The Stan / Ch9 contract includes the OZ based team covering final so they had to do it any way regardless of who was playing.

    It wasn’t great because it was really hollow plus it came across very early in the game broadcast that they weren’t at the ground.

    Crazy HorseC NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #886

    @ACT-Crusader said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @booboo said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @No-Quarter said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    I missed the game due to family commitments, just caught the highlights, and want to offer Chiefs fans my commiserations for having to endure both TJ and Justin Marshall in the commentary box for that one.

    Would rather TJ and Justin than the Aussie rabble we got.

    I don't mind Maloney as a commentator but was it 100% necessary to have Aus comms for an all NZ game?

    The Stan / Ch9 contract includes the OZ based team covering final so they had to do it any way regardless of who was playing.

    It wasn’t great because it was really hollow plus it came across very early in the game broadcast that they weren’t at the ground.

    We used to be able to opt for NZ commentary. Not sure what happened to that.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #887

    @Crazy-Horse said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @booboo said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @No-Quarter said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    I missed the game due to family commitments, just caught the highlights, and want to offer Chiefs fans my commiserations for having to endure both TJ and Justin Marshall in the commentary box for that one.

    Would rather TJ and Justin than the Aussie rabble we got.

    I don't mind Maloney as a commentator but was it 100% necessary to have Aus comms for an all NZ game?

    The Stan / Ch9 contract includes the OZ based team covering final so they had to do it any way regardless of who was playing.

    It wasn’t great because it was really hollow plus it came across very early in the game broadcast that they weren’t at the ground.

    We used to be able to opt for NZ commentary. Not sure what happened to that.

    You still can I watched the NZ commentary on Stan it was there.

    Crazy HorseC boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #888

    @Chris said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Crazy-Horse said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @booboo said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @No-Quarter said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    I missed the game due to family commitments, just caught the highlights, and want to offer Chiefs fans my commiserations for having to endure both TJ and Justin Marshall in the commentary box for that one.

    Would rather TJ and Justin than the Aussie rabble we got.

    I don't mind Maloney as a commentator but was it 100% necessary to have Aus comms for an all NZ game?

    The Stan / Ch9 contract includes the OZ based team covering final so they had to do it any way regardless of who was playing.

    It wasn’t great because it was really hollow plus it came across very early in the game broadcast that they weren’t at the ground.

    We used to be able to opt for NZ commentary. Not sure what happened to that.

    You still can I watched the NZ commentary on Stan it was there.

    Bugger. I looked but couldn't see it.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #889

    @Crazy-Horse said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Chris said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Crazy-Horse said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @booboo said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @No-Quarter said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    I missed the game due to family commitments, just caught the highlights, and want to offer Chiefs fans my commiserations for having to endure both TJ and Justin Marshall in the commentary box for that one.

    Would rather TJ and Justin than the Aussie rabble we got.

    I don't mind Maloney as a commentator but was it 100% necessary to have Aus comms for an all NZ game?

    The Stan / Ch9 contract includes the OZ based team covering final so they had to do it any way regardless of who was playing.

    It wasn’t great because it was really hollow plus it came across very early in the game broadcast that they weren’t at the ground.

    We used to be able to opt for NZ commentary. Not sure what happened to that.

    You still can I watched the NZ commentary on Stan it was there.

    Bugger. I looked but couldn't see it.

    Yeah it’s still there mate

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #890

    @Chris said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Crazy-Horse said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @booboo said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @No-Quarter said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    I missed the game due to family commitments, just caught the highlights, and want to offer Chiefs fans my commiserations for having to endure both TJ and Justin Marshall in the commentary box for that one.

    Would rather TJ and Justin than the Aussie rabble we got.

    I don't mind Maloney as a commentator but was it 100% necessary to have Aus comms for an all NZ game?

    The Stan / Ch9 contract includes the OZ based team covering final so they had to do it any way regardless of who was playing.

    It wasn’t great because it was really hollow plus it came across very early in the game broadcast that they weren’t at the ground.

    We used to be able to opt for NZ commentary. Not sure what happened to that.

    You still can I watched the NZ commentary on Stan it was there.

    Out of interest, and anticipating upcoming Bledisloes, how?

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #891

    @booboo said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Chris said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Crazy-Horse said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @booboo said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @No-Quarter said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    I missed the game due to family commitments, just caught the highlights, and want to offer Chiefs fans my commiserations for having to endure both TJ and Justin Marshall in the commentary box for that one.

    Would rather TJ and Justin than the Aussie rabble we got.

    I don't mind Maloney as a commentator but was it 100% necessary to have Aus comms for an all NZ game?

    The Stan / Ch9 contract includes the OZ based team covering final so they had to do it any way regardless of who was playing.

    It wasn’t great because it was really hollow plus it came across very early in the game broadcast that they weren’t at the ground.

    We used to be able to opt for NZ commentary. Not sure what happened to that.

    You still can I watched the NZ commentary on Stan it was there.

    Out of interest, and anticipating upcoming Bledisloes, how?

    If you click on the rugby tag it normally comes up in up coming live rugby or replays it just reads NZ coverage.
    I have premier Stan costs me $38 I am not sure if there are cheaper packages with less options.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #892

    @ACT-Crusader said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @booboo said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @No-Quarter said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    I missed the game due to family commitments, just caught the highlights, and want to offer Chiefs fans my commiserations for having to endure both TJ and Justin Marshall in the commentary box for that one.

    Would rather TJ and Justin than the Aussie rabble we got.

    I don't mind Maloney as a commentator but was it 100% necessary to have Aus comms for an all NZ game?

    The Stan / Ch9 contract includes the OZ based team covering final so they had to do it any way regardless of who was playing.

    It wasn’t great because it was really hollow plus it came across very early in the game broadcast that they weren’t at the ground.

    I didn't care, NZ or Oz commentary is generally as shit as each other.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    brodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #893

    I can't stand Justin Marshall. I'd rather have the sound off than listen to him.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #894

    @Chris said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Even more of a Hugh performance by Fletcher Newell going the whole 80 minutes considering he played the whole game with a grade-two MCL injury.
    He injured his knee in the Blues SF.
    Probably will put Newell out of the French series. Bugger!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Final - Crusaders v Chiefs
Rugby Matches
crusaderschiefs
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.