• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Wallabies v Lions II

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
australialions
402 Posts 41 Posters 1.8k Views
Wallabies v Lions II
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to booboo last edited by
    #286

    @booboo said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    The most egregious refereeing was allowing Sheehan to dive over tacklers to score a try.

    Strangely the Aus comms were ok with that one. Said diving for a try was OK.

    ...???

    As always in rugby it's not black and white.

    Here is what World Rugby clarified a couple of years ago

    In principle, in a try scoring situation, if the action is deemed to be a dive forward for a try, then it should be permitted. If a player is deemed to have left the ground to avoid a tackle; or to jump, or hurdle a potential tackler, then this is dangerous play and should be sanctioned accordingly.
    
    No QuarterN antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
    9
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote last edited by
    #287

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to booboo last edited by
    #288

    @booboo said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    The most egregious refereeing was allowing Sheehan to dive over tacklers to score a try.

    Strangely the Aus comms were ok with that one. Said diving for a try was OK.

    ...???

    I think they were repeating the ref's assertion

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to KiwiMurph last edited by No Quarter
    #289

    @KiwiMurph said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    @booboo said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    The most egregious refereeing was allowing Sheehan to dive over tacklers to score a try.

    Strangely the Aus comms were ok with that one. Said diving for a try was OK.

    ...???

    As always in rugby it's not black and white.

    Here is what World Rugby clarified a couple of years ago

    In principle, in a try scoring situation, if the action is deemed to be a dive forward for a try, then it should be permitted. If a player is deemed to have left the ground to avoid a tackle; or to jump, or hurdle a potential tackler, then this is dangerous play and should be sanctioned accordingly.
    

    I don't think the refs got that one right. In that context - a quick tap with a wall of defenders in front of you - diving like that to "score a try" is not really a reasonable action despite being close to the line. The intention of it was first and foremost to jump/hurdle multiple potential head on tacklers which is outlawed for safety reasons.

    MajorRageM 1 Reply Last reply
    9
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to voodoo last edited by NTA
    #290

    @voodoo said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    All a bit doom and gloom mate. Let’s put it is this way - if Valentini had been able to play a full 80 - heck, even 70 - last night, I reckon we wouldn’t be talking about the ref, we’d be getting pumped for a decider in 6 days time at Homebush

    But we're not, are we? Valetini was critical to our chances, and that's one issue (depth) among many.

    We gave up control of the game and an 18 point lead. Some dumb fuck penalties like Wilson's clean out past the ruck. Not being able to make simple one on one tackles.

    Yeah we've cleaned up our ruck work but they took years and a change in coach.

    The systems are fucked. They've been wrecked by successive mismanagement over the last 2 decades.

    The grassroots game is dying in the arse. A lot of people like me are sick of trying to push the barrow, while watching the absolute fuckery being perpetrated by the corporates with no feel for the game or the people who care about it.

    We pretend it's all rosy because WR handed the retarded kid the RWC hosting rights to try and save a nation that is rapidly sliding to Tier 2.

    KiwiMurphK antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote last edited by
    #291

    An excellent review of the game by Two Cents Rugby.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    wrote last edited by Dan54
    #292

    You know, I sick of what is isn't right with the last ruck, did Tizzano come in from side? Yep looked like it. Did he have head lower than hips? Yep looks like. Did Morgan make contact above shoulders? Yes looks like it (well below in this case as his head was down). Even after these questions are answered one way or other, the question remaining, is why was Keenan not tackled? Was it Ikitau was on heels and never came forward.

    antipodeanA sparkyS 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to NTA last edited by
    #293

    @NTA said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    The systems are fucked. They've been wrecked by successive mismanagement over the last 2 decades.

    I think there have been some real improvements in the last few years though

    Improved broadcast deal

    Huge revenue deals for Lions tour and RWC

    U20s improved (this year their best results were beating RSA in RSA, drawing with NZ U20s, putting 68 points on England)

    Whilst not able to sign every player there are some players coming through schoolboys who have been captured and are now flourishing on the international stage - I.e. Bell and Jorgensen

    A more sensible Super Rugby structure with a new mini Aus based Super Rugby tournament happening later this year for more game time.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to KiwiMurph last edited by
    #294

    @KiwiMurph said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    @booboo said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    The most egregious refereeing was allowing Sheehan to dive over tacklers to score a try.

    Strangely the Aus comms were ok with that one. Said diving for a try was OK.

    ...???

    As always in rugby it's not black and white.

    Here is what World Rugby clarified a couple of years ago

    In principle, in a try scoring situation, if the action is deemed to be a dive forward for a try, then it should be permitted. If a player is deemed to have left the ground to avoid a tackle; or to jump, or hurdle a potential tackler, then this is dangerous play and should be sanctioned accordingly.
    

    I don't see a genuine conundrum in distinguishing between the two. For me it matters not that Sheehan was attempting to score a try, he deliberately jumped over attempted tacklers, not a dive towards the line. A typical characteristic of a dive at the tryline is one's motion is downwards, not upwards.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Dan54 last edited by
    #295

    @Dan54 said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    You know, I sick of what is isn't right with the last ruck, did Tizzano come in from side? Yep looked like it. Did he have head lower than hips? Yep looks like.

    You're going to have to explain the point of this to me. Tizzano is first there, so there's no ruck. So there's no requirement for him to have his head above his hips.

    Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to Dan54 last edited by sparky
    #296

    @Dan54 It's dire defence by Len Ikitau. If he'd made a decent tackle and held on, then no try. Probably a penalty to Australia, the Wallabies win and the series goes to a decider.

    He didn't make the tackle. Kennan scores. The Lions win. And the rest is history.

    Make your tackles, kids.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to NTA last edited by
    #297

    @NTA said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    We gave up control of the game and an 18 point lead. Some dumb fuck penalties like Wilson's clean out past the ruck. Not being able to make simple one on one tackles.

    Wilson was remarkably inaccurate at rucks during the game, but what I noticed most (apart from some terribly porous defence) was Australia dictated proceedings whilst they had go forward. That disappeared once Skelton and Valentini left the field.

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to antipodean last edited by
    #298

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    A typical characteristic of a dive at the tryline is one's motion is downwards, not upwards.

    But then you get wingers who go airborne in the corner which is a dive for the tryline but not downwards - so it's not so clear cut.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to KiwiMurph last edited by
    #299

    @KiwiMurph said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    A typical characteristic of a dive at the tryline is one's motion is downwards, not upwards.

    But then you get wingers who go airborne in the corner which is a dive for the tryline but not downwards - so it's not so clear cut.

    Is there a wall of defenders in front of them or someone coming across in defence? IMO WR have clarified this adequately and the Sheehan try is clear which of the two scenarios it falls into.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to antipodean last edited by
    #300

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    @KiwiMurph said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    A typical characteristic of a dive at the tryline is one's motion is downwards, not upwards.

    But then you get wingers who go airborne in the corner which is a dive for the tryline but not downwards - so it's not so clear cut.

    Is there a wall of defenders in front of them or someone coming across in defence? IMO WR have clarified this adequately and the Sheehan try is clear which of the two scenarios it falls into.

    There often is someone coming across in defence and they never penalise the diving winger

    The reason it was so effective was because the Lions had set it up all tour by having their tap move runs go directly to ground which faked out the Wallabies.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to KiwiMurph last edited by
    #301

    @KiwiMurph said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    @KiwiMurph said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    A typical characteristic of a dive at the tryline is one's motion is downwards, not upwards.

    But then you get wingers who go airborne in the corner which is a dive for the tryline but not downwards - so it's not so clear cut.

    Is there a wall of defenders in front of them or someone coming across in defence? IMO WR have clarified this adequately and the Sheehan try is clear which of the two scenarios it falls into.

    There often is someone coming across in defence and they never penalise the diving winger

    Precisely.

    The reason it was so effective was because the Lions had set it up all tour by having their tap move runs go directly to ground which faked out the Wallabies.

    Effective and clearly illegal.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to antipodean last edited by
    #302

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    Effective and clearly illegal.

    Disagree.

    The wording World Rugby says "diving forward for a try". Doesn't say downwards. So in my view not black and white.

    But we clearly have differing views so might as well leave it there.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to antipodean last edited by
    #303

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    @Dan54 said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    You know, I sick of what is isn't right with the last ruck, did Tizzano come in from side? Yep looked like it. Did he have head lower than hips? Yep looks like.

    You're going to have to explain the point of this to me. Tizzano is first there, so there's no ruck. So there's no requirement for him to have his head above his hips.

    Sorry antipod, just one of arguments I read is that Tizzano isn't allowed head below hips at ruck etc. I not sure, but was just saying what I saw on all the arguments.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote last edited by sparky
    #304

    Gee, Aussie sports fans like a big old whinge these days.

    Can't they see the Lions won that fair and square? Whatever happened to accepting the official's decision and moving on?

    Dan54D MajorRageM 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to antipodean last edited by
    #305

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    @NTA said in Wallabies v Lions II:

    We gave up control of the game and an 18 point lead. Some dumb fuck penalties like Wilson's clean out past the ruck. Not being able to make simple one on one tackles.

    Wilson was remarkably inaccurate at rucks during the game, but what I noticed most (apart from some terribly porous defence) was Australia dictated proceedings whilst they had go forward. That disappeared once Skelton and Valentini left the field.

    I didn’t watch a lot of Super rugby this year, but watching Wilson in this game, it was also noticeable that he was getting smacked on most carries. Has he dropped some weight or lost some power? I don’t recall this from past internationals

    MaussM 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Wallabies v Lions II
Rugby Matches
australialions
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.