Boks v Wobblies I

[nostrildamus]

@pakman said in Boks v Wobblies I:

Boks are beatable. Main strike weapon will be maul.

this post actually aged very well.

[Frank]

Harry Wilson is the kind of 8 we need.

[antipodean]

@Frank said in Boks v Wobblies I:

Harry Wilson is the kind of 8 we need.

Enthusiastic but limited?

[nostrildamus]

@Frank said in Boks v Wobblies I:

Harry Wilson is the kind of 8 we need.

He's a hardworking, eager, blunt weapon that can be very effective when coached in the right direction. Which seems to be happening at the moment.

[NTA]

Great feet and pace. Won't run through many brick walls but won't stop trying. He burned a few smaller men for pace on the weekend.

Which makes me wonder if the Boks were putting in 100%.

[pakman]

Hanse Cronje?

[barbarian]

His support play is so underrated. Scores way more tries than he should, just by reading the play and being in the right place at the right time.

[pakman]

Is Tony Brown leading South Africa down the wrong path?

The New Zealander's attacking influence is stark, but it may not be the right approach for the double world champions.

[NTA]

@pakman said in Boks v Wobblies I:

Hanse Cronje?

@barbarian said in Boks v Wobblies I:

His support play is so underrated. Scores way more tries than he should, just by reading the play and being in the right place at the right time.

I got confused for a minute

[pakman]

Aug 21  /  Rugby

Matt Williams: The Wallabies have answered insults and pettiness in the only way possible

Joe Schmidt can take a bow after Australia exploited a Springbok vulnerability in a way no other team has been able to

[pakman]

@pakman said in Boks v Wobblies I:

Howard was extremely well regarded by Leicester.