Blues vs. Chiefs 2026
-
@KiwiMurph said in Blues vs. Chiefs 2026:
Cheers BOK
BOK has sabotaged so many Blues games. Not sure if its malicious or incompetence.
-
@KiwiMurph said in Blues vs. Chiefs 2026:
Cheers BOK
BOK has sabotaged so many Blues games. Not sure if its malicious or incompetence.
@brodean said in Blues vs. Chiefs 2026:
@KiwiMurph said in Blues vs. Chiefs 2026:
Cheers BOK
BOK has sabotaged so many Blues games. Not sure if its malicious or incompetence.
Malicious. He's from the Crusaders region.
-
So what is the sanction against BOK? That was an enormous mistake in a low scoring game. Players get dropped for large errors.. maybe he should ref development games for a month
@Duluth said in Blues vs. Chiefs 2026:
So what is the sanction against BOK? That was an enormous mistake in a low scoring game. Players get dropped for large errors.. maybe he should ref development games for a month
Then go back to reffing club rugby in Blenheim for the rest of the season.
-
@KiwiMurph said in Blues vs. Chiefs 2026:
Cheers BOK
I liked this bit:
The review concluded that Vaa'i's actions constituted leaving the ground to avoid a tackle, rather than simply diving forward to score a try, and that as a result the try should not have been awarded.
ahem:
@antipodean said in Blues vs. Chiefs 2026:BOK having a lend - Vai'i jumps over defenders, not a dive at the ground.
-
@brodean said in Blues vs. Chiefs 2026:
@KiwiMurph said in Blues vs. Chiefs 2026:
Cheers BOK
BOK has sabotaged so many Blues games. Not sure if its malicious or incompetence.
Malicious. He's from the Crusaders region.
@African-Monkey said in Blues vs. Chiefs 2026:
Malicious. He's from the Crusaders region.
Worse. He's a North Harbour ref now.
Personally, I think what Vaa'i did should be legal. He didn't dive over a ruck.
-
Interesting coz Ben was messaged on Instagram afterwards and asked and he doubled down on the call saying it was legal. Can't remember the page that posted it but I'll try find it.
I thought it was an interesting call but he called it then and there, shit for the result when the game was close but what can ya do.
-
Interesting coz Ben was messaged on Instagram afterwards and asked and he doubled down on the call saying it was legal. Can't remember the page that posted it but I'll try find it.
I thought it was an interesting call but he called it then and there, shit for the result when the game was close but what can ya do.
@Yeetyaah said in Blues vs. Chiefs 2026:
Interesting coz Ben was messaged on Instagram afterwards and asked and he doubled down on the call saying it was legal. Can't remember the page that posted it but I'll try find it.
I thought it was and interesting call but he called it then and there, shit for the result when the game was close but what can ya do.
I would have thought that fact both blues defenders dived off their feet immediately and fell into the ground would constitute Va’ai just jumping over two guys that were lying on the ground. It’s not like they were on their feet and attempting a tackle. If two players dive at your feet, I think it should be legal juts to jump over them, particularly if they hit the ground before you jump
-
@Yeetyaah said in Blues vs. Chiefs 2026:
Interesting coz Ben was messaged on Instagram afterwards and asked and he doubled down on the call saying it was legal. Can't remember the page that posted it but I'll try find it.
I thought it was and interesting call but he called it then and there, shit for the result when the game was close but what can ya do.
I would have thought that fact both blues defenders dived off their feet immediately and fell into the ground would constitute Va’ai just jumping over two guys that were lying on the ground. It’s not like they were on their feet and attempting a tackle. If two players dive at your feet, I think it should be legal juts to jump over them, particularly if they hit the ground before you jump
@jimmyb said in Blues vs. Chiefs 2026:
both blues defenders dived off their feet immediately and fell into the ground would constitute Va’ai just jumping over two guys that were lying on the ground
You have the sequence wrong. They were driving into a tackle exactly where a player diving at the line would be. They assumed the player would take a legal course to the line. TV jumps, then they wind up on the ground because of his illegal jump over tacklers
-
@KiwiMurph said in Blues vs. Chiefs 2026:
Cheers BOK
I liked this bit:
The review concluded that Vaa'i's actions constituted leaving the ground to avoid a tackle, rather than simply diving forward to score a try, and that as a result the try should not have been awarded.
ahem:
@antipodean said in Blues vs. Chiefs 2026:BOK having a lend - Vai'i jumps over defenders, not a dive at the ground.
@antipodean yep, were several comments at the time that it was wrong.
BOK gave an explanation at the time as to awarding it, which was at odds as to how it looked.
Yeah it is odd how refs dont get 'sanctioned' like players would after a massive error, but I guess the 'ref pool' is significantly smaller.
-
@jimmyb said in Blues vs. Chiefs 2026:
both blues defenders dived off their feet immediately and fell into the ground would constitute Va’ai just jumping over two guys that were lying on the ground
You have the sequence wrong. They were driving into a tackle exactly where a player diving at the line would be. They assumed the player would take a legal course to the line. TV jumps, then they wind up on the ground because of his illegal jump over tacklers
@Duluth said in Blues vs. Chiefs 2026:
@jimmyb said in Blues vs. Chiefs 2026:
both blues defenders dived off their feet immediately and fell into the ground would constitute Va’ai just jumping over two guys that were lying on the ground
You have the sequence wrong. There were driving into a tackle exactly where a player diving at the line would be. They assumed the player would take a legal course to the line. TV jumps, then they wind up on the ground because of his illegal jump over tacklers
Wrong? Nooo
-
@antipodean yep, were several comments at the time that it was wrong.
BOK gave an explanation at the time as to awarding it, which was at odds as to how it looked.
Yeah it is odd how refs dont get 'sanctioned' like players would after a massive error, but I guess the 'ref pool' is significantly smaller.
@taniwharugby said in Blues vs. Chiefs 2026:
@antipodean yep, were several comments at the time that it was wrong.
BOK gave an explanation at the time as to awarding it, which was at odds as to how it looked.
Yeah it is odd how refs dont get 'sanctioned' like players would after a massive error, but I guess the 'ref pool' is significantly smaller.
Refs do get sanctioned. They face a review after every game where they have to explain decisions etc.
