Chiefs vs Hurricanes
-
If the Chiefs are going into games with the tactic of niggly off the ball bullshit then they'll very quickly become my hatiest team.
@No-Quarter said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
If the Chiefs are going into games with the tactic of niggly off the ball bullshit then they'll very quickly become my hatiest team.
Get on board bro.
Last year one of my most enjoyable games was when the Lions beat them at Hamilton. Have even found myself cheering for a draw when they play against Aussie teams
-
@Bones said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@No-Quarter said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
If the Chiefs are going into games with the tactic of niggly off the ball bullshit then they'll very quickly become my hatiest team.
See this is a bit odd to me - they've always been like this under Rennie and especially so against kiwi teams and more especially against "higher-rated" teams.
So what you're saying is they should already be my most hatiest team...
@No-Quarter said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
So what you're saying is they should already be my most hatiest team...
I'm a Blues fan, so I'm meant to hate them. But by god they play some good footy at times - Rennie with a dose of Wayne-o thrown in makes for a hell of a footy side.
Niggly though.
-
@Unco said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Bones said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@No-Quarter said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
If the Chiefs are going into games with the tactic of niggly off the ball bullshit then they'll very quickly become my hatiest team.
See this is a bit odd to me - they've always been like this under Rennie and especially so against kiwi teams and more especially against "higher-rated" teams.
I only really noticed that against the Saders because it really got under their skin. Canes/Chiefs games always seemed scrappy from both sides, while Landers/Chiefs games always seemed fairly tame in comparison.
The Canes are the most niggly team IMO. Mainly based around TJP and Coles.
Anyone trying to paint the Canes as victims in the niggle stakes is having a laugh.@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Unco said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Bones said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@No-Quarter said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
If the Chiefs are going into games with the tactic of niggly off the ball bullshit then they'll very quickly become my hatiest team.
See this is a bit odd to me - they've always been like this under Rennie and especially so against kiwi teams and more especially against "higher-rated" teams.
I only really noticed that against the Saders because it really got under their skin. Canes/Chiefs games always seemed scrappy from both sides, while Landers/Chiefs games always seemed fairly tame in comparison.
The Canes are the most niggly team IMO. Mainly based around TJP and Coles.
Anyone trying to paint the Canes as victims in the niggle stakes is having a laugh.I don't know what you're talking about sir. Baby faced Coles would never hurt a fly and TJP is nothing more than an enthusiatic child. Those Chiefs thugs on the other hand...
-
There was an incident in that game where NMS called the mark and then about 10 minutes later (ok 10 seconds) Cane ran right up to him and got in his face. From that point on Cane was on my "People to Kill List". BBBR and that filthy, thuggish arseclown Bird are also on the list now too.
It's funny how guys you would go gay for when they wear black can be someone you'd like to maim when wearing the jersey of another province/Super team.
Coles and TJP aren't niggly at all. They're just miles better than anyone else playing their positions and any animosity against them is pure jealously.
-
There was an incident in that game where NMS called the mark and then about 10 minutes later (ok 10 seconds) Cane ran right up to him and got in his face. From that point on Cane was on my "People to Kill List". BBBR and that filthy, thuggish arseclown Bird are also on the list now too.
It's funny how guys you would go gay for when they wear black can be someone you'd like to maim when wearing the jersey of another province/Super team.
Coles and TJP aren't niggly at all. They're just miles better than anyone else playing their positions and any animosity against them is pure jealously.
-
@Rancid-Schnitzel Cane has always been a douche. He's the type of guy who would go around pushing people in the back.
@mimic see I've never seen him like that, funny how different we all see things.
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Unco said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Bones said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@No-Quarter said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
If the Chiefs are going into games with the tactic of niggly off the ball bullshit then they'll very quickly become my hatiest team.
See this is a bit odd to me - they've always been like this under Rennie and especially so against kiwi teams and more especially against "higher-rated" teams.
I only really noticed that against the Saders because it really got under their skin. Canes/Chiefs games always seemed scrappy from both sides, while Landers/Chiefs games always seemed fairly tame in comparison.
The Canes are the most niggly team IMO. Mainly based around TJP and Coles.
Anyone trying to paint the Canes as victims in the niggle stakes is having a laugh.I don't know what you're talking about sir. Baby faced Coles would never hurt a fly and TJP is nothing more than an enthusiatic child. Those Chiefs thugs on the other hand...
@No-Quarter said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Unco said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Bones said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@No-Quarter said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
If the Chiefs are going into games with the tactic of niggly off the ball bullshit then they'll very quickly become my hatiest team.
See this is a bit odd to me - they've always been like this under Rennie and especially so against kiwi teams and more especially against "higher-rated" teams.
I only really noticed that against the Saders because it really got under their skin. Canes/Chiefs games always seemed scrappy from both sides, while Landers/Chiefs games always seemed fairly tame in comparison.
The Canes are the most niggly team IMO. Mainly based around TJP and Coles.
Anyone trying to paint the Canes as victims in the niggle stakes is having a laugh.I don't know what you're talking about sir. Baby faced Coles would never hurt a fly and TJP is nothing more than an enthusiatic child. Those Chiefs thugs on the other hand...
-
@Toddy said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
Shocking to see BBBR running in from miles away to get a dig in. Good spotting BSG.
BBBR was just telling Hooper to ignore Coles the troll.
-
And I bet those guys smashed a few beers together after the game.
Rugby is awesome.
-
And I bet those guys smashed a few beers together after the game.
Rugby is awesome.
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
And I bet those guys smashed a few
beersgatorades (or is it still powerade?) together after the game.Rugby is awesome.
-
@Unco said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Bones said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@No-Quarter said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
If the Chiefs are going into games with the tactic of niggly off the ball bullshit then they'll very quickly become my hatiest team.
See this is a bit odd to me - they've always been like this under Rennie and especially so against kiwi teams and more especially against "higher-rated" teams.
I only really noticed that against the Saders because it really got under their skin. Canes/Chiefs games always seemed scrappy from both sides, while Landers/Chiefs games always seemed fairly tame in comparison.
The Canes are the most niggly team IMO. Mainly based around TJP and Coles.
Anyone trying to paint the Canes as victims in the niggle stakes is having a laugh.@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
The Canes are the most niggly team IMO. Mainly based around TJP and Coles.
Coles especially. He was the niggliest player on the field but spent the whole night whinging to the ref about the other team. The midfield handbags in the 1st half was started by, you guessed it, Coles.
I did find Leitch continually patting TJP's head after the Retallick try funny though.
