• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Bulls v Highlanders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
highlandersbulls
97 Posts 30 Posters 12.3k Views
Bulls v Highlanders
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    African Monkey
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #57

    @Nepia A shoulder to the head is a straight red. It was reckless from Naholo accidental or not and he got what he deserved.

    If it was a Bulls player who did it you guys would all be calling for it to be red as well.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester Draws
    wrote on last edited by
    #58

    I think that Naholo was straight red, no question. I don't care what he thought he was doing, at the last moment he decided to turn his shoulder in. If the Bulls guy had caught it, what was Naholo going to do other than a high tackle, coming in like that?

    You can hardly say the ref was biased when he then not only red carded Bulls player, but stopped the likely winning try to do so.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Chester Draws on last edited by taniwharugby
    #59

    @Chester-Draws see him turning his shoulder is more out of self preservation and bracing for impact rather than anything malice.

    As I said above, harsh to get a RC, but unfortunately RC was the only outcome from shoulder to head.

    Was it the Welsh tour last year he got carded, similar clumsiness (man in the air)

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to African Monkey on last edited by
    #60

    @African-Monkey said in Bulls v Highlanders:

    @Nepia A shoulder to the head is a straight red. It was reckless from Naholo accidental or not and he got what he deserved.

    If it was a Bulls player who did it you guys would all be calling for it to be red as well.

    I'd really like to think I wouldn't

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to booboo on last edited by Nepia
    #61

    @booboo said in Bulls v Highlanders:

    @African-Monkey said in Bulls v Highlanders:

    @Nepia A shoulder to the head is a straight red. It was reckless from Naholo accidental or not and he got what he deserved.

    If it was a Bulls player who did it you guys would all be calling for it to be red as well.

    I'd really like to think I wouldn't

    Yep, me either, as I said earlier I think it's getting stupid.

    @African-Monkey I'm not even a Naholo fan, I don't like the way he plays and think he should be playing for Fiji.

    @nzzp I think that TR explains the mitigation - clearly Naholo wasn't setting out to to shoulder the Bulls player, he's got his hands out for the ball. If anyone wants to claim that he was setting out to do that they're lying to themselves. Now, if WR, that fountain of wisdom want to deem that accidental clashes meet the threshold of a red card then that's up to them, I'm going to call them idiots for that.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #62

    The problem with lowering the threshold was shown later in the game. A Bulls player shouldered a Highlanders player in the head. The Highlanders player was just lying there on the ground. So the sanction for Naholo and the Bulls player was the same, even though one incident was a lot worse.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #63

    @hydro11 The suspension might be different though.

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #64

    @Stargazer said in Bulls v Highlanders:

    @hydro11 The suspension might be different though.

    That's true. I do think some of the suspensions handed out are way too short. I'm incredibly frustrated by players meeting the red card threshold and then receiving a two week suspension.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #65

    @Nepia said in Bulls v Highlanders:
    Now, if WR, that fountain of wisdom want to deem that accidental clashes meet the threshold of a red card then that's up to them, I'm going to call them idiots for that.

    I think that is what they're saying. We may not like it but like the maul laws, them's the farking laws.

    Be bloody careful is the answer. What was normal rugby incidents is now card material. THe effects have been talked about up north, and we've seen it with some 'interesting' kick-chase calls. Hope it doesn't affect the upcoming Lions series, but quite concerned that it will.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • UncoU Offline
    UncoU Offline
    Unco
    wrote on last edited by
    #66

    Just saw the incident. Looked to me like Naholo was going for the ball, saw the man in front of him and dropped his shoulder to protect himself from the impact. Split second reaction but a reckless one, so I have no issue with the red card.

    Second incident was way worse though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #67

    Naholo actually threw his shoulder into the impact, how insane do you have to be to think he was going for the ball? Sure he may have been initially but once the ball was gone he recklessly tucked the arm and threw his shoulder. He doesn't do that, he doesn't get a card. It's pretty fucking simple. But then we can't have a misguided whinge at WR....

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #68

    @Bones I reckon a guy could trip over his own shoelaces and you'd make a case for a red card.

    But to be serious, he was bracing for impact, protecting yourself shouldn't have the same sanction as deliberately kicking someone or lining up an actual high shoulder charge. The line in the sand from 'misguided WR' is too close.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #69

    @Nepia well what the fuck were his shoelaces doing in the way? Sounds reckless to me.

    Passing off throwing the shoulder into someone's face as "bracing for impact" is pretty neat though. Sam Whitelock probably should've gone with that defence eh.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #70

    @Bones said in Bulls v Highlanders:

    Passing off throwing the shoulder into someone's face as "bracing for impact" is pretty neat though. Sam Whitelock probably should've gone with that defence eh.

    Pretty sure we have covered this before...if you have an inevitable contact, natural instinct is to brace yourself, for the contact, and I agree with Nepia that in that situation, his shoulder is going to minimise impact to himself (aka self preservation)

    Sure it will only result in a Red Card, but when instincts often kick in with barely a thought, changing the way you react is tough.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #71

    @taniwharugby that may be the case, but isn't so in this instance. Naholo wasn't going to cop any sort of impact of great magnitude. It's being disingenuous to try and pass that off as self preservation.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #72

    @Bones will agree to disagree, if I was running into a contact, while I'd try to avoid it (which is when you are as likely to hurt yourself more) if it was coming, I'd ready myself.

    As I said, the RC was inevitable, I expect we will see differing punishment form the 2 cards in that game, also reckon there was some amateur theatrics from the Bulls player he impacted too.

    BonesB nzzpN 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #73

    @taniwharugby again, that was not at all an act of self preservation. That was a reckless throw of the shoulder.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #74

    @Bones oh, right, sorry, I was wrong all along, you have shown me the error of my ways oh great messiah 😉

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #75

    Given the debate here, I went and watched it.

    Assuming I watched the right incident, I can't see how anyone can see that as anything other than a red card.

    That was terrible, what a fucking idiotic muppet. I'd go mental if he did that in a black jersey.

    Hope I saw the right video 🙂

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #76

    @taniwharugby said in Bulls v Highlanders:

    @Bones oh, right, sorry, I was wrong all along, you have shown me the error of my ways oh great messiah 😉

    What? Yeah Naholo definitely dodged a bullet there. If he hadn't have run straight at the guy and thrown his shoulder into his face he was in real trouble. He did well to avoid harming himself.

    In other news the Canes could've probably beaten the Crusaders by 30 odd points.

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    3

Bulls v Highlanders
Rugby Matches
highlandersbulls
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.