Auckland vs Waikato
-
-
A good number of the players are full time professional rugby players, thus should have all the basic skills under control already and really no justifiable reason for the employment of a skills coach. In this case it seems not.
@Higgins That's the attitude from the Hart era. The All Blacks and other teams have shown that constant practice and development of skills are necessary in the modern game.
These players don't perform this poorly at Super Rugby and international level, and don't become unskilled for no reason. Lack of training is the obvious answer.
-
Geez that could have been yellow for that high shot.
@African-Monkey Compare the penalties on the line to the penalty try and yellow card in the 1st half.
-
@Higgins Certainly didn't. It's gonna be a long season for us.
-
I don't mind the result. I'd like them to perform so badly that they have no choice but to fire White.
-
Not a great game skillwise, but I'll take the 5 pts.
Waikato's lineout was woeful so something wasn't right there. No Faima, Skeen and Jacobson probably.
Some Reece magic was the only real highlight.
I've liked the look of Lansdown everytime I've seen him play for Waikato, still very young too. Christie tried his best to lose that game.
-
Have there been many younger teams fielded in an NPC match? By my count there were 11under 21's playing for Waikato out of 22 used. Only half a dozen players with much experience. I thought Lansdown might have been man of the match, and hope we see more of him
-
Probability of an article in the Herald taking Auckland Rugby to task for their woefully coached team? Zero.
@Tim said in Auckland vs Waikato:
Probability of an article in the Herald taking Auckland Rugby to task for their woefully coached team? Zero.
That's because it doesn't fit their long running narrative that the problems at the Blues are all down to whoever the incumbent coach is. The foundation of rugby in the Blues area is weak. NH are slowly turning things around, Northland will always have resource issues but Auckland have no excuses other than poor planning/selection/coaching/administration
-
@Tim said in Auckland vs Waikato:
Probability of an article in the Herald taking Auckland Rugby to task for their woefully coached team? Zero.
That's because it doesn't fit their long running narrative that the problems at the Blues are all down to whoever the incumbent coach is. The foundation of rugby in the Blues area is weak. NH are slowly turning things around, Northland will always have resource issues but Auckland have no excuses other than poor planning/selection/coaching/administration
-
@Crucial Before last season Auckland were good the previous seasons under Feeney and Pivac - both of whom made a final.
@KiwiMurph said in Auckland vs Waikato:
@Crucial Before last season Auckland were good the previous seasons under Feeney and Pivac - both of whom made a final.
But somehow they have now managed to identify the wrong coach and the wrong players or have let club rugby get so poor that selections are a stab in the dark.
-
@KiwiMurph said in Auckland vs Waikato:
@Crucial Before last season Auckland were good the previous seasons under Feeney and Pivac - both of whom made a final.
But somehow they have now managed to identify the wrong coach and the wrong players or have let club rugby get so poor that selections are a stab in the dark.
-
White probably needs to stay as a technical coach than Head coach.
-
This Waikato side is not a good side. That is a shocker from Auckland.
Bizzare to see a completely empty stand on one side of the field. (WTW took a photo of it)
Remember when NPC used to mean something?
@Hooroo said in Auckland vs Waikato:
Bizzare to see a completely empty stand on one side of the field. (WTW took a photo of it)
They have empty stands on three sides. Usually only open the north stand, which of course is in the shade during the day.
A strong argument for a boutique stadium
