Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Highlanders vs. Hurricanes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
highlandershurricanes
327 Posts 39 Posters 10.9k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • No QuarterN No Quarter

    @chris-b said in Highlanders vs. Hurricanes:

    @toddy Yep. I wouldn't have given it a yellow, but they have.

    I disagree, but I'll have to suck that up. 🙂

    Hope they don't extend to a red for that incident, but if they do I'll have to suck that up as well.

    At least he's not a Crusader. 🙂 🙂

    Yellow was more than enough for that incident. I thought Jules should have gone too.

    But the cleanout on TJP doesn't look good. IIRC he's reaching for the ball and Squire torpedoes into him, shoulder directly connecting with the face. Would not be surprised if he cops 1 - 2 weeks for it, amazed the officials didn't even look at it again.

    I won't lie though, I've never been a fan of Squire. He is niggly, often puts in cheap shots that could seriously cost us one day, and he has gone missing against the top teams basically every test he's started. He's a flat track bully.

    WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    wrote on last edited by
    #302

    @no-quarter said in Highlanders vs. Hurricanes:

    @chris-b said in Highlanders vs. Hurricanes:

    @toddy Yep. I wouldn't have given it a yellow, but they have.

    I disagree, but I'll have to suck that up. 🙂

    Hope they don't extend to a red for that incident, but if they do I'll have to suck that up as well.

    At least he's not a Crusader. 🙂 🙂

    Yellow was more than enough for that incident. I thought Jules should have gone too.

    But the cleanout on TJP doesn't look good. IIRC he's reaching for the ball and Squire torpedoes into him, shoulder directly connecting with the face. Would not be surprised if he cops 1 - 2 weeks for it, amazed the officials didn't even look at it again.

    I won't lie though, I've never been a fan of Squire. He is niggly, often puts in cheap shots that could seriously cost us one day, and he has gone missing against the top teams basically every test he's started. He's a flat track bully.

    But the camera's missed what Julian might or might not have done. The refs assumed he was up to no good and ruled out the try. Poor reffing really although there was a forward pass that was missed.

    But Canes were out-muscled in the 2nd half. Plumtree has a lot of work to do. And Ricky looks like he needs a good rest. Hopefully he gets IT over the nest few weeks

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ToddyT Toddy

      Is there even a slim chance of Savea making the ABs again? He so average now. Would he even command a big NH retirement contract?

      Agree about the punch though. What a fucken dumbass (if he did throw a punch)

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Louis
      wrote on last edited by
      #303

      @toddy Julian Savea should either reinvent himself as a midfielder or go overseas.

      That was a really disappointing loss on the back of losing to nobody's second favourite team last week. The pack's not that bad on paper, so not sure what's going on there.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ToddyT Toddy

        Is there even a slim chance of Savea making the ABs again? He so average now. Would he even command a big NH retirement contract?

        Agree about the punch though. What a fucken dumbass (if he did throw a punch)

        canefanC Offline
        canefanC Offline
        canefan
        wrote on last edited by
        #304

        @toddy said in Highlanders vs. Hurricanes:

        Is there even a slim chance of Savea making the ABs again? He so average now. Would he even command a big NH retirement contract?

        Agree about the punch though. What a fucken dumbass (if he did throw a punch)

        I reckon he'll still get a big payday up north based on his reputation alone. The NZRFU should grant him a release, to save payroll and to allow him to get a deal before teams up in the NH start watching footage and realise he doesn't have it anymore

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • taniwharugbyT Offline
          taniwharugbyT Offline
          taniwharugby
          wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
          #305

          So Jordie done a Norm Hewitt....kinda.

          Apparently not intoxicated just entered an unlocked house he thought was someone else's with a friend to eat their Maccas....their friends house was over the road.

          http://nzh.tw/12063606

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

            So Jordie done a Norm Hewitt....kinda.

            Apparently not intoxicated just entered an unlocked house he thought was someone else's with a friend to eat their Maccas....their friends house was over the road.

            http://nzh.tw/12063606

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Louis
            wrote on last edited by
            #306

            @taniwharugby Eating Maccas in someone else's lounge at 5am and not drunk. Sounds like a Tui billboard. But, as long as they apologise to the girls in the flat, I can't see a problem. I remember doing the Undy 500 back in the day and doing worse, although I obviously wasn't an All Black.

            taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
            3
            • L Louis

              @taniwharugby Eating Maccas in someone else's lounge at 5am and not drunk. Sounds like a Tui billboard. But, as long as they apologise to the girls in the flat, I can't see a problem. I remember doing the Undy 500 back in the day and doing worse, although I obviously wasn't an All Black.

              taniwharugbyT Offline
              taniwharugbyT Offline
              taniwharugby
              wrote on last edited by
              #307

              @louis get the girls a bunch of free Adidas kit would be a start!

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • 9 Offline
                9 Offline
                98blueandgold
                wrote on last edited by
                #308

                Every other day occurrence in Dunners. Nobody locks their flats, every house looks the same, Maccas...of course and not drunk???? haha.

                1 Reply Last reply
                3
                • taniwharugbyT Offline
                  taniwharugbyT Offline
                  taniwharugby
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #309

                  It is clear that Julian has thrown a punch, it is unknown if he connected.

                  Even if he did, the time to cite him has passed hasn't it?

                  https://www.rugbypass.com/news/savea-punch-no-punch

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Machpants
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #310

                    Yep no footage to prove that he wasn't punching the ground in frustration, he's off the hook

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • taniwharugbyT Offline
                      taniwharugbyT Offline
                      taniwharugby
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #311

                      0_1528002399037_50560efd-e9c3-4c54-9a60-06c69aaf3c16-image.png

                      MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                        0_1528002399037_50560efd-e9c3-4c54-9a60-06c69aaf3c16-image.png

                        MN5M Offline
                        MN5M Offline
                        MN5
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #312

                        @taniwharugby said in Highlanders vs. Hurricanes:

                        0_1528002399037_50560efd-e9c3-4c54-9a60-06c69aaf3c16-image.png

                        Not sure why Tony Veich is grinning down the bottom left....

                        Fiancee beating cuntface that he is

                        taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                        4
                        • MN5M MN5

                          @taniwharugby said in Highlanders vs. Hurricanes:

                          0_1528002399037_50560efd-e9c3-4c54-9a60-06c69aaf3c16-image.png

                          Not sure why Tony Veich is grinning down the bottom left....

                          Fiancee beating cuntface that he is

                          taniwharugbyT Offline
                          taniwharugbyT Offline
                          taniwharugby
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #313

                          @mn5 from his FB page and his phone??

                          MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                            @mn5 from his FB page and his phone??

                            MN5M Offline
                            MN5M Offline
                            MN5
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #314

                            @taniwharugby said in Highlanders vs. Hurricanes:

                            @mn5 from his FB page and his phone??

                            Call me an old stick in the mud but I guess I take offense to someone who's public indiscretion far outweighs what Jordie did sharing piss taking memes on his page.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • RapidoR Offline
                              RapidoR Offline
                              Rapido
                              wrote on last edited by Rapido
                              #315

                              Don't know if this has been discussed, I didn't watch the game.

                              But what's the difference between Squire's cardable offence and the tackle on Li in act of scoring try (by Evans I think)?

                              Both collected around the head/neck. Both with the ball carrier fucking low.

                              My opinion is Squire's is not even a penalty, but for consistency and so that I can re-adjust my 'filth' meter , was the other even looked at?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Machpants
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #316

                                It is not the tackle he has been cited for but cleaning out TJ's face with his shoulder earlier in that game

                                RapidoR 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Machpants

                                  It is not the tackle he has been cited for but cleaning out TJ's face with his shoulder earlier in that game

                                  RapidoR Offline
                                  RapidoR Offline
                                  Rapido
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #317

                                  @machpants said in Highlanders vs. Hurricanes:

                                  It is not the tackle he has been cited for but cleaning out TJ's face with his shoulder earlier in that game

                                  Yes, and that's fair enough.

                                  I hate cleanouts, full stop, opportunity to line a player up so no sympathy from me if they get in wrong , and when the do I suspect it's half deliberate.

                                  But what about the in-game yellow? You can see the space Squire was expecting to hit, then the cane put his head in that space. Which was waist height or lower.

                                  I know swinging arm is different ruling to a high tackle. But jebus, its rugby.

                                  nzzpN mariner4lifeM 2 Replies Last reply
                                  1
                                  • RapidoR Rapido

                                    @machpants said in Highlanders vs. Hurricanes:

                                    It is not the tackle he has been cited for but cleaning out TJ's face with his shoulder earlier in that game

                                    Yes, and that's fair enough.

                                    I hate cleanouts, full stop, opportunity to line a player up so no sympathy from me if they get in wrong , and when the do I suspect it's half deliberate.

                                    But what about the in-game yellow? You can see the space Squire was expecting to hit, then the cane put his head in that space. Which was waist height or lower.

                                    I know swinging arm is different ruling to a high tackle. But jebus, its rugby.

                                    nzzpN Offline
                                    nzzpN Offline
                                    nzzp
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #318

                                    @rapido said in Highlanders vs. Hurricanes:

                                    I know swinging arm is different ruling to a high tackle. But jebus, its rugby.

                                    There's going to be more and more of this. What cheeses me is the consistency - see Kaino last year with the Lions (YC), but nothign for the hit on Naholo that broke his jaw. Both hits were on people aroudn waist high.

                                    All of this really begs the question - is it really about protection of the head? If so, there is some duty imposed on the runner to not drop voluntarily in the contact zone. And, for that matter, it shouldn't matter who you connect with - if you inadvertantly smack someone on your own side in the head, if it is about protection, that should get you a consequence.

                                    Like anything rugby related, it's not the laws, it's the deep inconsistency from week to week (or even within the game) that just make you shake your head.

                                    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • No QuarterN Offline
                                      No QuarterN Offline
                                      No Quarter
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #319

                                      Didn't they change the law so that contact with the head, regardless of height, is a YC offense? Meaning players can just put their head down and charge at the line. It's making it very difficult to ref. I know the standard of reffing is pretty low at the moment, but I really don't envy them with the directives and law changes being rolled out.

                                      RapidoR 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • No QuarterN No Quarter

                                        Didn't they change the law so that contact with the head, regardless of height, is a YC offense? Meaning players can just put their head down and charge at the line. It's making it very difficult to ref. I know the standard of reffing is pretty low at the moment, but I really don't envy them with the directives and law changes being rolled out.

                                        RapidoR Offline
                                        RapidoR Offline
                                        Rapido
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #320

                                        @no-quarter said in Highlanders vs. Hurricanes:

                                        Didn't they change the law so that contact with the head, regardless of height, is a YC offense? Meaning players can just put their head down and charge at the line. It's making it very difficult to ref. I know the standard of reffing is pretty low at the moment, but I really don't envy them with the directives and law changes being rolled out.

                                        It's the directives that are the problem. Refs are unable to make commons sense decisions because they're given inflexible directives.

                                        Foul play to the head should be punished, rugby accidents should be play on - and maybe if they need to be seen to do something to avoid future legal suits .... some sort of re-education program to encourage changes in techniques ( like driving demerits), if change in outcomes is at all possible in these scenarios

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • nzzpN nzzp

                                          @rapido said in Highlanders vs. Hurricanes:

                                          I know swinging arm is different ruling to a high tackle. But jebus, its rugby.

                                          There's going to be more and more of this. What cheeses me is the consistency - see Kaino last year with the Lions (YC), but nothign for the hit on Naholo that broke his jaw. Both hits were on people aroudn waist high.

                                          All of this really begs the question - is it really about protection of the head? If so, there is some duty imposed on the runner to not drop voluntarily in the contact zone. And, for that matter, it shouldn't matter who you connect with - if you inadvertantly smack someone on your own side in the head, if it is about protection, that should get you a consequence.

                                          Like anything rugby related, it's not the laws, it's the deep inconsistency from week to week (or even within the game) that just make you shake your head.

                                          taniwharugbyT Offline
                                          taniwharugbyT Offline
                                          taniwharugby
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #321

                                          @nzzp see had the O'Brien/Naholo hit not happened, Kaino gets a red...but the bed had been made the week before failing to address O'Brien.

                                          It is a,huge problem with players putting themselves in danger by ducking into tackles or God forbid, diving for the line, and any defender is at the mercy of luck as to whether they make head contact.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search