Hurricanes v Chiefs
-
Back on topic - great game to watch so far.
Awesome defence on Beauden, thought he was in for all money there.
-
@majorrage
Isn’t it more like Nelson? Sounds great until you go there?
Alarm bells just went off at Chris B’s.
-
From an ABs perspective I wonder whether TJ is in danger of being overtaken by either TTT or Weber
-
Fuck i hate TJP
How many replays does it take mate
BULLSHIT!!!
That's not the way it works either fluffybunnies. Fuck the TMO!
-
@gt12 said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:
What?
That’s not how the protocols aren’t meant to work
This!! Fucking this!! The TMOs are making ot up as they go along. Get rid
-
From an ABs perspective I wonder whether TJ is in danger of being overtaken by either TTT or Weber
@shadowtrooper said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:
From an ABs perspective I wonder whether TJ is in danger of being overtaken by either TTT or Weber
Not tonight!
-
Fuck i hate TJP
How many replays does it take mate
BULLSHIT!!!
That's not the way it works either fluffybunnies. Fuck the TMO!
@mariner4life said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:
Fuck i hate TJP
How many replays does it take mate
BULLSHIT!!!
That's not the way it works either fluffybunnies. Fuck the TMO!
The TMO said he didn't lose the ball. Whats the problem?
-
@gt12 said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:
What?
That’s not how the protocols aren’t meant to work
Yea, real strange.
Ref has said he’s seen a knock on. Evidence is inconclusive so surely the call stays with the ref?
But no, let’s flip this on its head and say no clear and obvious knock on.
How about no clear and obvious try like the ref suggested in the first place? -
@gt12 said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:
What?
That’s not how the protocols aren’t meant to work
Yea, real strange.
Ref has said he’s seen a knock on. Evidence is inconclusive so surely the call stays with the ref?
But no, let’s flip this on its head and say no clear and obvious knock on.
How about no clear and obvious try like the ref suggested in the first place?@gunner said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:
@gt12 said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:
What?
That’s not how the protocols aren’t meant to work
Yea, real strange.
Ref has said he’s seen a knock on. Evidence is inconclusive so surely the call stays with the ref?
But no, let’s flip this on its head and say no clear and obvious knock on.
How about no clear and obvious try like the ref suggested in the first place?looked a clear try to me. No separation, had one hand on the ball at all times - no issue from me and my bottle of shiraz
-
Look, as a former flanker i lnow why they did it? But neither of those vanes players contested the ball, both wrapped on to the man. Why should they be rewarded?
