NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry)
-
@stargazer said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
Uncontested scrums because Canterbury has lost both hookers to injury.
Also down to 14 as no subs available.
Scrap that, I'm wrong there is a sub on.
-
@stargazer said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
Uncontested scrums because Canterbury has lost both hookers to injury.
Also down to 14 as no subs available.
Scrap that, I'm wrong there is a sub on.
@cyclops said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
@stargazer said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
Uncontested scrums because Canterbury has lost both hookers to injury.
Also down to 14 as no subs available.
Scrap that, I'm wrong there is a sub on.
Really? I thought if you make it go uncontested you have to lose a player?
-
@cyclops said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
@stargazer said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
Uncontested scrums because Canterbury has lost both hookers to injury.
Also down to 14 as no subs available.
Scrap that, I'm wrong there is a sub on.
Really? I thought if you make it go uncontested you have to lose a player?
-
Epic game
-
@anonymous Stupid rule, btw. Should be allowed to have 15 players on the park.
-
@anonymous Stupid rule, btw. Should be allowed to have 15 players on the park.
@stargazer said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
@anonymous Stupid rule, btw. Should be allowed to have 15 players on the park.
Nonsense. If you elect to go uncontested scrums, you should lose a player.
-
@stargazer said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
@anonymous Stupid rule, btw. Should be allowed to have 15 players on the park.
Nonsense. If you elect to go uncontested scrums, you should lose a player.
@antipodean They didn't elect it. They lost two hookers to injury and then the rules say uncontested scrums, because there isn't a hooker on the field. It wasn't a tactical decision.
-
@anonymous Stupid rule, btw. Should be allowed to have 15 players on the park.
@stargazer said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
@anonymous Stupid rule, btw. Should be allowed to have 15 players on the park.
Nah, great rule because you made the scrums go uncontested. Otherwise if you are getting done in the scrums you take off both hookers and get a huge advantage.
-
@stargazer said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
@anonymous Stupid rule, btw. Should be allowed to have 15 players on the park.
Nah, great rule because you made the scrums go uncontested. Otherwise if you are getting done in the scrums you take off both hookers and get a huge advantage.
-
@antipodean They didn't elect it. They lost two hookers to injury and then the rules say uncontested scrums, because there isn't a hooker on the field. It wasn't a tactical decision.
-
@stargazer Yeah, but the rule has to be this way cause the officials can't tell if it's because of injury or "injury".
@anonymous Nonsense.
-
@hydro11 I repeat, it wasn't a choice. It wasn't a tactical decision. Both hookers got injured.
@stargazer said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
@hydro11 I repeat, it wasn't a choice. It wasn't a tactical decision. Both hookers got injured.
Yes but history tells us that if rules can be exploited, they will be. It's like with Pocock and the quick conversion means you can't go to the TMO.
