Blues vs Stormers
-
Fuck yeah!
-
@Machpants said in Blues vs Stormers:
@Gunner said in Blues vs Stormers:
What’s the f’ing point of giving guys 2 or 3 minutes?
I’d love to get an honest answer from a coach on this one.
Because sitting on the bench for an entire game sucks, giving guys just a few minutes means they can blow of some steam.
Really? I call bullshit, only thing they might blow in that time is a bloody hammy!
-
@Machpants said in Blues vs Stormers:
@Gunner said in Blues vs Stormers:
What’s the f’ing point of giving guys 2 or 3 minutes?
I’d love to get an honest answer from a coach on this one.
Because sitting on the bench for an entire game sucks, giving guys just a few minutes means they can blow of some steam.
Really? I call bullshit, only thing they might blow in that time is a bloody hammy!
-
@Gunner said in Blues vs Stormers:
What’s the f’ing point of giving guys 2 or 3 minutes?
I’d love to get an honest answer from a coach on this one.
Because sitting on the bench for an entire game sucks, giving guys just a few minutes means they can blow of some steam.
@Machpants said in Blues vs Stormers:
@Gunner said in Blues vs Stormers:
What’s the f’ing point of giving guys 2 or 3 minutes?
I’d love to get an honest answer from a coach on this one.
Because sitting on the bench for an entire game sucks, giving guys just a few minutes means they can blow of some steam.
Something to do with players getting injured more often in the last ten mins to isn’t it? Might be protecting some players.
-
@kev said in Blues vs Stormers:
@Kirwan fuck you are kidding me. The lineout has been atrocious all night.
My point was Moulds has to be at least as good as Parsons at lineout To get ahead of him. He clearly isn’t.
I would select him.
-
@Gunner that's why, you might disagree, but having guys not playing makes them annoyed/doubt themselves/think the coaches don't rate them etc. Talking to coaches that's what I've been told
@Machpants said in Blues vs Stormers:
@Gunner that's why, you might disagree, but having guys not playing makes them annoyed/doubt themselves/think the coaches don't rate them etc. Talking to coaches that's what I've been told
theyve had guys sit on the becnh for 80 in other games this year...must be a game plan thing
-
@Kirwan that’s a point of view. Another would be that after 40 minutes Parsons starts walking. Any one would be better off the bench.
@kev said in Blues vs Stormers:
@Kirwan that’s a point of view. Another would be that after 40 minutes Parsons starts walking. Any one would be better off the bench.
I ain’t arguing, just saying that they are picking the better thrower for an important set piece. Moulds has had years to improve and three coaches to impress.
-
He's surely taking the piss with finally calling a not straight, and on that
Black has been good Mehrts? Really?
@mariner4life said in Blues vs Stormers:
Black has been good Mehrts? Really?
"distributed well" - clearly that doesn't refer to his passing
-
@Machpants said in Blues vs Stormers:
@Gunner that's why, you might disagree, but having guys not playing makes them annoyed/doubt themselves/think the coaches don't rate them etc. Talking to coaches that's what I've been told
theyve had guys sit on the becnh for 80 in other games this year...must be a game plan thing
@taniwharugby sure it's going to happen some times, but is the norm for everyone to get a go. So leaving a player in the bench is not ideal, even if he only gets a couple of minutes
-
@Gunner that's why, you might disagree, but having guys not playing makes them annoyed/doubt themselves/think the coaches don't rate them etc. Talking to coaches that's what I've been told
@Machpants said in Blues vs Stormers:
@Gunner that's why, you might disagree, but having guys not playing makes them annoyed/doubt themselves/think the coaches don't rate them etc. Talking to coaches that's what I've been told
Could be true, but by that stage I’d already be thinking ‘fuck you’, a couple of measly minutes wouldn’t change that
-
@Machpants said in Blues vs Stormers:
@Gunner that's why, you might disagree, but having guys not playing makes them annoyed/doubt themselves/think the coaches don't rate them etc. Talking to coaches that's what I've been told
Could be true, but by that stage I’d already be thinking ‘fuck you’, a couple of measly minutes wouldn’t change that
-
Very very happy with that.
Bonus point W.
Blues defence was awesome - hats off to Tana as defence coach.
Akira made errors but by fuck did he stand up against a big Saffa pack.
Tuipulotu - cripes he was good.
@KiwiMurph said in Blues vs Stormers:
Very very happy with that.
Bonus point W.
Blues defence was awesome - hats off to Tana as defence coach.
Akira made errors but by fuck did he stand up against a big Saffa pack.
Tuipulotu - cripes he was good.
One of the most accurate games I’ve seen from Patrick.
-
@kev said in Blues vs Stormers:
@Kirwan that’s a point of view. Another would be that after 40 minutes Parsons starts walking. Any one would be better off the bench.
I ain’t arguing, just saying that they are picking the better thrower for an important set piece. Moulds has had years to improve and three coaches to impress.
@Kirwan Parsons is a better lineout thrower (don’t disagree) but he is also a slug around the field. Why have a bench and not use it? Especially when hooker is such an energy sapping position. The selection of players both for the squad and match day have been issues for years.
