• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Crusaders v Blues

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusadersblues
268 Posts 41 Posters 7.7k Views
Crusaders v Blues
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #213

    @booboo said in Crusaders v Blues:

    PS. Thought that was a penalty try to Mo'unga

    65f36c19-f0ce-4753-8a45-27ce3cb259ab-image.jpeg https://resources.stuff.co.nz/content/dam/images/1/v/a/5/t/1/image.related.StuffLandscapeSixteenByNine.710x400.1va4jc.png/1558812435322.jpg

    Yup

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #214

    @Chris-B said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @booboo said in Crusaders v Blues:

    PS. Thought that was a penalty try to Mo'unga

    Certainly a reasonable case for it. One of those ones that you sometimes get away with and sometimes won't.

    A pretty scrappy game that doubtless would have been better under a roof. On this evidence, though, today's players would struggle in ankle deep mud, a howling wind, chasing a saturated pigskin about for 80 minutes! 🙂

    Who didn't?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #215

    @MajorRage said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @SammyC said in Crusaders v Blues:

    Best call of the night

    “Hey Reiko, your as useless as your brother”

    Conditions kept the blues in it, not a night for high scoring rugby

    Must have been some seriously shit calls if this was the best

    Simple minds, simple pleasures.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    wrote on last edited by
    #216

    Seems Like a poor decision by Mike Fraser Surprise,suprise.
    World Rugby rules state: A player must not tackle (or try to tackle) an opponent above the line of the shoulders even if the tackle starts below the line of the shoulders. A tackle around the opponent's neck or head is dangerous play.

    M taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #217

    @Chris But that has been ignored most of this season, last season it would have been a yellow. This season refs seem to be ignoring the 'even if it starts below' part. The TMO kept showing it, I think to make the ref change his mind. Whereas the ref kept saying, 'starts on the ball and rides up, penalty only' - I wish the refs would stick with one interpretation from one season to the fkn next!

    boobooB ChrisC 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Chris on last edited by taniwharugby
    #218

    @Chris yeah his summation and reasoning didnt really add up or make alot of sense, also seemed like the TMO didnt agree with him, but wasnt willing to over rule or call him on it either.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #219

    @Machpants said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @Chris But that has been ignored most of this season, last season it would have been a yellow. This season refs seem to be ignoring the 'even if it starts below' part. The TMO kept showing it, I think to make the ref change his mind. Whereas the ref kept saying, 'starts on the ball and rides up, penalty only' - I wish the refs would stick with one interpretation from one season to the fkn next!

    I didn't listen to the ref's audio but if said that then it's a penalty try.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #220

    @Machpants Then why have a Rule/Law that is ignored should it not be adhered too or amended.Just more inconsistencies from the Officials that has blighted SR all season.And I agree with you it has been ignored this season.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #221

    @taniwharugby It has been a common theme this SR season, Summations and Reasoning from the officials has been bewildering.Yes I noticed the TMO was gently trying to ask the question he should have been more forceful instead of a whimp.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #222

    @Chris said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @taniwharugby It has been a common theme this SR season, Summations and Reasoning from the officials has been bewildering.Yes I noticed the TMO was gently trying to ask the question he should have been more forceful instead of a whimp.

    The problem with TMO interfering is that they are sometimes (often?) wrong. Example being the recent dud call on the Crusaders in SA.

    Without seeing the video again, last night I thought he stayed on the shoulder and didn't make any sort of forcible contact with the neck. Borderline, but OK for me. But again, all you want is some consistency.

    On the subject of forward passes, I've just been re-watching ABs vs Wales in 2016. It had the Wayne Barnes overrulling his TMO, and callin ga forward pass that even the Welsh comms called as bckwards out of the hand. Seems bizarre that these mistakes keep getting made at the top leve

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #223

    @nzzp He defiantly contacted the head the pic Machpants posted above shows the start of the head contact, it just gets worse following on from that pic.The last part of the tackle that pulls Mo'unga to the ground is all head contact.

    nzzpN M 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #224

    @Chris fair enough - if they bottled it, then that's poor form. Again.

    Poor refereeing seems a blight on the game these days. The laws are too bloody complex, and no-one really seems to knwo what the technicalities are.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #225

    @nzzp refs seem to have directives of things to focus on, which is all good, but seems other rules seem to get relaxed or overlooked to ensure the 'KPI' rules are ruled on.

    Contact with the head was a big thing a few seasons back, similarly touching a man in the air, but seems both have not been as strict the last couple of seasons...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Chris on last edited by Machpants
    #226

    @Chris said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @nzzp He defiantly contacted the head the pic Machpants posted above shows the start of the head contact, it just gets worse following on from that pic.The last part of the tackle that pulls Mo'unga to the ground is all head contact.

    Yeah there are lot of damning pics around

    ![0_1558833517088_c73ad552-bbe2-4c32-af97-aa97d22df355-image.png](Uploading 100%)

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to Machpants on last edited by kev
    #227

    @Machpants there is no reason for the TMO not to get the call on this one correct. As said before he wimped out, because the on field ref kept repeating what he thought he saw rather than watching the replay. The TMOs job is to avoid that preconception. He should be really definite in his call. They need to more like Cricket and directly say change your call to the on field ref. In that regard George Ayoub is the worst offender - when he is there the TMOs role is handed back to the onfield ref making it worthless.

    The call last week with the Crusaders was pure incompetence. Interestingly the TMO wasn’t asked by the ref (I think) but offered his opinion. Given the number of things happening on a rugby field at once, this is probably the most difficult situation - what are the rules re when TMO can interfere ( foul play, and in the act of scoring a a try )? But regardless if in the comfort of the TMOs chair you cannot avoid preconception then you should not be in a TMOs role.

    So neither case should be accepted. The TMO is a great step towards improving decision making (NRLs better) but just need to keep getting better at it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nevorian
    wrote on last edited by
    #228

    Crusaders played like they had a couple of recent nights on the turps.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Nevorian on last edited by
    #229
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Jailbreak7J Offline
    Jailbreak7J Offline
    Jailbreak7
    wrote on last edited by Jailbreak7
    #230

    @SammyC - Excellent post.
    On Whetu Douglas - I wasn't sure of how good he would be. Started season slowly, but has become an increasingly important lynchpin to the pack. Looks to be a useful and effective option at 8.
    On Big Red - I also like watching him play, you know exactly what you're going to get from him. He's young and urgent and raw and above all else HUNGRY.
    On Akira - Man I would love to see him totally dominate, but he just dips in and out of games too often for my liking.
    On Nonu - Hate to say it, but his time in Black has come and gone I fear. He'.s been invaluable for the Blues this season, with his experence and leadership, but perhaps just too much of a logjam in his position for a WC berth.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #231

    I think if Nonu was ever a true shot, he needed to be managed better by the Blues, and maybe if SBW wasnt injured, he may well have been, but seems the minutes on the park are taking its toll on him.

    Akira is a bit of an enigma, has all the physical attributes to totally dominate, and does from time to time, all too infrequently, but is just missing that desire or want to take himself to the upper level. Think his minutes will also affect his chances of getting in black too.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #232

    Don't criticise Rieko! Even if it's something that has zilch to do with his rugby talent.

    So Akira is having a quiet year after a couple of barnstorming years...andcthis year is world cup? Plays nicely into my RWC secret weapon theory...

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Crusaders v Blues
Rugby Matches
crusadersblues
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.