Chiefs v Hurricanes
-
@Stargazer said in Chiefs v Hurricanes:
@Yeetyaah It's in a halfback's job description.
Also, if two Canes players do it often, that doesn't make that a "classic Canes" thing. It makes it a "classic Coles" or "classic TJP" thing.
What is the cutoff for individual bleating before it becomes a team characteristic? Had a flanker and a halfback so far tonight, and only a matter of time for Coles.
@Kirwan said in Chiefs v Hurricanes:
@Stargazer said in Chiefs v Hurricanes:
@Yeetyaah It's in a halfback's job description.
Also, if two Canes players do it often, that doesn't make that a "classic Canes" thing. It makes it a "classic Coles" or "classic TJP" thing.
What is the cutoff for individual bleating before it becomes a team characteristic? Had a flanker and a halfback so far tonight, and only a matter of time for Coles.
The problem is when it goes from selected queries at specific moments to a running inquisition throughout the match. When that happens, it goes from an honest enquiry to being a complete distraction from the main task at hand. This is TJ’s fundamental problem not just as a captain but as a footballer in general - he gets too easily distracted and wound up far too often. It’s no surprise that his half back play has turned to shit and the rest of the team are engaging in futile arguments with the refs under his captaincy.
-
So after all that hard work from the Chiefs forwards, the backs reward them by panicking and hurling the ball in the general direction of the winger.
-
@Stargazer said in Chiefs v Hurricanes:
Disagree with that decision. Should have been a try to Jordie.
genuinely don't know what the rulebook says about that
-
Jaco is just making this shit up
-
Yeah,I think that should have been try ..
-
@hydro11 Yep, and even if Dmac still had his hand on the ball; it was Jordie who had control.
@Stargazer said in Chiefs v Hurricanes:
@hydro11 Yep, and even if Dmac still had his hand on the ball; it was Jordie who had control.
That's not what the law says. DMac satisfied the criteria for control. Good decision IMO.
-
@Stargazer said in Chiefs v Hurricanes:
@hydro11 Yep, and even if Dmac still had his hand on the ball; it was Jordie who had control.
That's not what the law says. DMac satisfied the criteria for control. Good decision IMO.
@antipodean said in Chiefs v Hurricanes:
@Stargazer said in Chiefs v Hurricanes:
@hydro11 Yep, and even if Dmac still had his hand on the ball; it was Jordie who had control.
That's not what the law says. DMac satisfied the criteria for control. Good decision IMO.
for the anoraks amongst us, Law 21
https://laws.worldrugby.org/?law=21If there is doubt about which team first grounded the ball in in-goal, play is restarts with a five-metre scrum, in line with the place where the ball was grounded. The attacking team throws in.
