Crusaders v Blues

[Bones]

@Snowy said in Crusaders v Blues:

@booboo said in Crusaders v Blues:

@Bones @Chris @Siam
I've not mentioned versing or apostrophes for months

Everybody knows that you are watching.

And judging.

So fat.

[Snowy]

@Bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

@Snowy said in Crusaders v Blues:

@booboo said in Crusaders v Blues:

@Bones @Chris @Siam
I've not mentioned versing or apostrophes for months

Everybody knows that you are watching.

And judging.

So fat.

You had bring Akira into this again. Just going to be another shitfight.

[booboo]

@booboo said in Crusaders v Blues:

@Snowy said in Crusaders v Blues:

@booboo said in Crusaders v Blues:

@Bones @Chris @Siam
I've not mentioned versing or apostrophes for months

Everybody knows that you are watching.

Would never have guessed

Sorry @Snowy. Would never of guessed.

[booboo]

@Bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

@Snowy said in Crusaders v Blues:

@booboo said in Crusaders v Blues:

@Bones @Chris @Siam
I've not mentioned versing or apostrophes for months

Everybody knows that you are watching.

And judging.

So fat.

You've been stalking?

[Duluth]

The AB outside back discussion has moved to this thread:

https://www.forum.thesilverfern.com/topic/4017/ab-squad-for-the-bledisloe-cup/247

[Chris B.]

@Duluth said in Crusaders v Blues:

What do the scrum aficiandos make of that crucial scrum at 1.44? @pakman @NTA others?

Blues get the penalty, but I'm not sure what for - Crusaders wheeling? Moody angling in - or something on the near side?

The key thing I can see is that Ofa's been buckled and driven up into the air, which is pretty impressive if Moody has done it legally.

[NTA]

@Chris-B crusaders THP looks like his knee hit the deck under pressure. You can see him drop just before they try to cover it up by wheeling.

[Chris B.]

@NTA Good spot - you're right!

[NTA]

@Chris-B said in Crusaders v Blues:

@NTA Good spot - you're right!

Took me a couple of rewinds - you can also see him twist inward just before it happens based on my third viewing.

[Chris B.]

@NTA I was looking for something a bit later, based on when the ref blows his whistle.

But Mike's knee definitely hits the deck early.

[NTA]

@Chris-B said in Crusaders v Blues:

@NTA I was looking for something a bit later, based on when the ref blows his whistle.

Yeah it was weird that he waited - shame he was off-camera at a point where his arm might have gone out, but I didn't hear "Advantage!" come thru the mic either.

[pakman]

@Chris-B said in Crusaders v Blues:

@Duluth said in Crusaders v Blues:

What do the scrum aficiandos make of that crucial scrum at 1.44? @pakman @NTA others?

Blues get the penalty, but I'm not sure what for - Crusaders wheeling? Moody angling in - or something on the near side?

The key thing I can see is that Ofa's been buckled and driven up into the air, which is pretty impressive if Moody has done it legally.

@NTA spotted the knee, which was tricky. As for Ofa, he definitely was popped. For me Moody didn’t look as though he got under his chest, so may we’ll have been result of combined upward pressure from Codie and Joe.

[Nevorian]

@junior said in Crusaders v Blues:

@Winger said in Crusaders v Blues:

@booboo said in Crusaders v Blues:

@Winger said in Crusaders v Blues:

@KiwiMurph said in Crusaders v Blues:

Beauden was rubbish. One of the worst games i've ever seen him play. He gave away 2 soft penalties - he kicked out on the full - he put in a shit kick before halftime. He was pants. He also looks like he has seriously lost his pace.

He was brilliant about 4-5 years back and before then. But hes been going slowly downhill since. But still good but not great.

I hoped the Blues coaches would get him moving back towards great again. But so far hes moving in the opposite direction. Maybe his time is up. Or the Blues move was a big mistake. Or hes not really a FB.

I'm bored with the Crusaders winning year after year so disappointed with this result. The only team that might have challenged is so far behind now the title is decided after 4 games

So the other teams have got to get better

It can't be done if most of the best players sign for the best team (as their AB chances are much better). And the next level down quality players bugger of overseas.

NZR need to come up with a (financial) system were the best players are evenly shared out (at present it almost ensures the opposite). Otherwise a new competition will slowly die. Or will never achieve the following it could have if one team wins ever year. This includes Aust (or SA if still included although this model has done its time). Aust can only support 3 teams at most. So 5 EVEN NZ teams and three QUALITY Aussie teams = success. But NZ need to be ruthless (ignore reasons why it can be done. For example Abs might need to move teams as Barrett did) to ensure an even distribution of players. This new competition must be seen as very important rather than just the ABs. And super rugby almost as an irrelevant feeder for the ABs (the current set up).

I would have thought the best way to do this is actually to ensure that the coaching at all franchises is strong. Despite their poor recent form, one would think having Gats coaching the Chiefs would make that a desirable destination (perhaps he needs to improve his assistants). Similarly, it seems Rangi is leading a strong coaching unit at the Blues and I’m sure the way they’ve played this year will make players consider moving there.

The Crusaders would be lucky to have more than four or five of the best players in NZ at the moment - Taylor, Whitelock, Mo'unga, Goodhue, Jordan with Moody debatable

[nzzp]

@Nevorian said in Crusaders v Blues:

@junior said in Crusaders v Blues:

@Winger said in Crusaders v Blues:

@booboo said in Crusaders v Blues:

@Winger said in Crusaders v Blues:

@KiwiMurph said in Crusaders v Blues:

Beauden was rubbish. One of the worst games i've ever seen him play. He gave away 2 soft penalties - he kicked out on the full - he put in a shit kick before halftime. He was pants. He also looks like he has seriously lost his pace.

He was brilliant about 4-5 years back and before then. But hes been going slowly downhill since. But still good but not great.

I hoped the Blues coaches would get him moving back towards great again. But so far hes moving in the opposite direction. Maybe his time is up. Or the Blues move was a big mistake. Or hes not really a FB.

I'm bored with the Crusaders winning year after year so disappointed with this result. The only team that might have challenged is so far behind now the title is decided after 4 games

So the other teams have got to get better

It can't be done if most of the best players sign for the best team (as their AB chances are much better). And the next level down quality players bugger of overseas.

NZR need to come up with a (financial) system were the best players are evenly shared out (at present it almost ensures the opposite). Otherwise a new competition will slowly die. Or will never achieve the following it could have if one team wins ever year. This includes Aust (or SA if still included although this model has done its time). Aust can only support 3 teams at most. So 5 EVEN NZ teams and three QUALITY Aussie teams = success. But NZ need to be ruthless (ignore reasons why it can be done. For example Abs might need to move teams as Barrett did) to ensure an even distribution of players. This new competition must be seen as very important rather than just the ABs. And super rugby almost as an irrelevant feeder for the ABs (the current set up).

I would have thought the best way to do this is actually to ensure that the coaching at all franchises is strong. Despite their poor recent form, one would think having Gats coaching the Chiefs would make that a desirable destination (perhaps he needs to improve his assistants). Similarly, it seems Rangi is leading a strong coaching unit at the Blues and I’m sure the way they’ve played this year will make players consider moving there.

The Crusaders would be lucky to have more than four or five of the best players in NZ at the moment - Taylor, Whitelock, Mo'unga, Goodhue, Jordan with Moody debatable

spot on - which makes their comeback on Saturday night even more remarkable

[Nepia]

@Nevorian said in Crusaders v Blues:

@junior said in Crusaders v Blues:

@Winger said in Crusaders v Blues:

@booboo said in Crusaders v Blues:

@Winger said in Crusaders v Blues:

@KiwiMurph said in Crusaders v Blues:

Beauden was rubbish. One of the worst games i've ever seen him play. He gave away 2 soft penalties - he kicked out on the full - he put in a shit kick before halftime. He was pants. He also looks like he has seriously lost his pace.

He was brilliant about 4-5 years back and before then. But hes been going slowly downhill since. But still good but not great.

I hoped the Blues coaches would get him moving back towards great again. But so far hes moving in the opposite direction. Maybe his time is up. Or the Blues move was a big mistake. Or hes not really a FB.

I'm bored with the Crusaders winning year after year so disappointed with this result. The only team that might have challenged is so far behind now the title is decided after 4 games

So the other teams have got to get better

It can't be done if most of the best players sign for the best team (as their AB chances are much better). And the next level down quality players bugger of overseas.

NZR need to come up with a (financial) system were the best players are evenly shared out (at present it almost ensures the opposite). Otherwise a new competition will slowly die. Or will never achieve the following it could have if one team wins ever year. This includes Aust (or SA if still included although this model has done its time). Aust can only support 3 teams at most. So 5 EVEN NZ teams and three QUALITY Aussie teams = success. But NZ need to be ruthless (ignore reasons why it can be done. For example Abs might need to move teams as Barrett did) to ensure an even distribution of players. This new competition must be seen as very important rather than just the ABs. And super rugby almost as an irrelevant feeder for the ABs (the current set up).

I would have thought the best way to do this is actually to ensure that the coaching at all franchises is strong. Despite their poor recent form, one would think having Gats coaching the Chiefs would make that a desirable destination (perhaps he needs to improve his assistants). Similarly, it seems Rangi is leading a strong coaching unit at the Blues and I’m sure the way they’ve played this year will make players consider moving there.

The Crusaders would be lucky to have more than four or five of the best players in NZ at the moment - Taylor, Whitelock, Mo'unga, Goodhue, Jordan with Moody debatable

The match thread would suggest Bridge is the best winger in NZ, and maybe the greatest of all time - so six.

[Stargazer]

@Nevorian

[Nevorian]

@Nepia whereas the Sky team would have Clarke and Talea. But yes I agree Bridge is bloody good isn't he?

[Nepia]

@Nevorian said in Crusaders v Blues:

@Nepia whereas the Sky team would have Clarke and Talea. But yes I agree Bridge is bloody good isn't he?

The Sky team - the one with TJ in it? Bahahahahahahahahahahaha, rest, bahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

[junior]

@nzzp said in Crusaders v Blues:

@Nevorian said in Crusaders v Blues:

@junior said in Crusaders v Blues:

@Winger said in Crusaders v Blues:

@booboo said in Crusaders v Blues:

@Winger said in Crusaders v Blues:

@KiwiMurph said in Crusaders v Blues:

Beauden was rubbish. One of the worst games i've ever seen him play. He gave away 2 soft penalties - he kicked out on the full - he put in a shit kick before halftime. He was pants. He also looks like he has seriously lost his pace.

He was brilliant about 4-5 years back and before then. But hes been going slowly downhill since. But still good but not great.

I hoped the Blues coaches would get him moving back towards great again. But so far hes moving in the opposite direction. Maybe his time is up. Or the Blues move was a big mistake. Or hes not really a FB.

I'm bored with the Crusaders winning year after year so disappointed with this result. The only team that might have challenged is so far behind now the title is decided after 4 games

So the other teams have got to get better

It can't be done if most of the best players sign for the best team (as their AB chances are much better). And the next level down quality players bugger of overseas.

NZR need to come up with a (financial) system were the best players are evenly shared out (at present it almost ensures the opposite). Otherwise a new competition will slowly die. Or will never achieve the following it could have if one team wins ever year. This includes Aust (or SA if still included although this model has done its time). Aust can only support 3 teams at most. So 5 EVEN NZ teams and three QUALITY Aussie teams = success. But NZ need to be ruthless (ignore reasons why it can be done. For example Abs might need to move teams as Barrett did) to ensure an even distribution of players. This new competition must be seen as very important rather than just the ABs. And super rugby almost as an irrelevant feeder for the ABs (the current set up).

I would have thought the best way to do this is actually to ensure that the coaching at all franchises is strong. Despite their poor recent form, one would think having Gats coaching the Chiefs would make that a desirable destination (perhaps he needs to improve his assistants). Similarly, it seems Rangi is leading a strong coaching unit at the Blues and I’m sure the way they’ve played this year will make players consider moving there.

The Crusaders would be lucky to have more than four or five of the best players in NZ at the moment - Taylor, Whitelock, Mo'unga, Goodhue, Jordan with Moody debatable

spot on - which makes their comeback on Saturday night even more remarkable

The issue is not the spread of the best players, contrary to what @Winger says. The issues is rather than evenness of the remaining talent. The difference between the 'Saders' best and worst players, IMO, is significantly less than that at other franchises. This means that they have less glaring weaknesses across the park and, crucially, on their bench. This is to my mind a large part of why they so often pull away from their opposition in the last 20 mins of matches. Similarly, it's what made the ABs so lethal between say 2010 and 2016 and it's where we've been caught up by our major opposition since that time.

[cgrant]

Karl T had a mare at scrum time against Jager. He's far from his best form. On the contrary, Hodgman has been dominant vs Alaatoa. He looks more and more a FAB to me : good scrummager (most improved prop of the year so far) and great workrate.