Crusaders v Chiefs
-
That was a shit call for the Webber binning. But fuck we are good. So well drilled.
@chchfanatic said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
That was a shit call for the Webber binning. But fuck we are good. So well drilled.
You're certainly good at taking your opportunities ... no matter how they're handed to you.
-
To be honest despite the decisions , there is daylight between these 2 teams in terms of most facets .., you could give the chiefs a 20 point head start and would still back the Saders ..
-
@african-monkey Huge goof to take him instead of Karl T, forcing Ofa T to cover loosehead off the bench. Karl T missed most of Super Rugby with meningitis, but got back into good condition and was in huge form for North Harbour.
@tim Yes at test level, you actually have to do the main part of your role you're selected for, where as you can get away with it at the levels below.
-
To be honest despite the decisions , there is daylight between these 2 teams in terms of most facets .., you could give the chiefs a 20 point head start and would still back the Saders ..
@steven-harris said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
To be honest despite the decisions , there is daylight between these 2 teams in terms of most facets .., you could give the chiefs a 20 point head start and would still back the Saders ..
Well, they got a 14 point head start ...
-
That was a shit call for the Webber binning. But fuck we are good. So well drilled.
@chchfanatic said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
That was a shit call for the Webber binning. But fuck we are good. So well drilled.
A very well coached team...
-
@bones I've heard if often, but is clarifying it was taken down by the attacking team so no penalty?
-
@taniwharugby can't say I have.
-
Another missed forward pass
-
Oh good. More tmo action.
-
@bones turn the subtitles on
-
Oh good. More tmo action.
@billy-tell said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
Oh good. More tmo action.
The TMO actually killed the action before it went to him. Is that a first?
-
To be honest despite the decisions , there is daylight between these 2 teams in terms of most facets .., you could give the chiefs a 20 point head start and would still back the Saders ..
@steven-harris said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
To be honest despite the decisions , there is daylight between these 2 teams in terms of most facets .., you could give the chiefs a 20 point head start and would still back the Saders ..
The only danger with that is that the officials/their systems/training may get let off the hook... hopefully it doesn't go that badly wrong in future in a genuinely close game.
-
@billy-tell said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
Oh good. More tmo action.
The TMO actually killed the action before it went to him. Is that a first?
@anonymous TMO didnt want any of that action!
-
@chchfanatic said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
That was a shit call for the Webber binning. But fuck we are good. So well drilled.
A very well coached team...
@crazy-horse said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@chchfanatic said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
That was a shit call for the Webber binning. But fuck we are good. So well drilled.
A very well coached team...
Are you sure you don't want a straight swap with Foster?
-
To be honest despite the decisions , there is daylight between these 2 teams in terms of most facets .., you could give the chiefs a 20 point head start and would still back the Saders ..
@steven-harris It's a weak comp imo with only two strong teams in it. We probably overrated it a tad last year.
-
@billy-tell said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
Oh good. More tmo action.
The TMO actually killed the action before it went to him. Is that a first?
@anonymous said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@billy-tell said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
Oh good. More tmo action.
The TMO actually killed the action before it went to him. Is that a first?
Fell asleep on the fuck off button
