• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Hurricanes v Reds

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
hurricanesreds
314 Posts 38 Posters 12.1k Views
Hurricanes v Reds
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to Damo on last edited by
    #225

    @damo said in Hurricanes v Reds:

    I think that is really harsh. The ball was way up in the air. Very hard to successfully force it. I didn't think he intentionally knocked that dead.

    Then don't try to. He didn't attempt to catch it and that's not a genuine attempt to ground a ball when it's that high off the ground. Good decision.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #226

    @anonymous said in Hurricanes v Reds:

    @chris said in Hurricanes v Reds:

    What the fuck was he supposed to do let Him score fucking joke

    Try to grab or ground the ball. Pretty obvious

    He tried to ground it,it was a downward motion
    Harsh call I have been in the position you are trying to get it grounded fucking idiot Ref has made a complete clown of himself the whole game.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    replied to Damo on last edited by
    #227

    @damo said in Hurricanes v Reds:

    I think that is really harsh. The ball was way up in the air. Very hard to successfully force it. I didn't think he intentionally knocked that dead.

    If it was too hard to force due to the height then he should have left it.

    StagS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to African Monkey on last edited by
    #228

    @african-monkey said in Hurricanes v Reds:

    Fair call, he knocked it dead on purpose. People can moan and moan about it but the call was right and rules are rules.

    Judgement call on the deliberate part. I could see it coming but thought it harsh. The PT part is what I question more.

    taniwharugbyT R A 3 Replies Last reply
    2
  • S Do not disturb
    S Do not disturb
    Steven Harris
    wrote on last edited by Steven Harris
    #229

    Funny how good your scrum can be when you have your 3 best scrummaging front rowers on the paddock

    KruseK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by Donsteppa
    #230

    That looked to me like just two players going for the ball, not much more intent than that, but made to look worse by slow mo.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #231

    @crucial i thought Laumape may have been in front of the kicker too

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Rebound
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #232

    @crucial why are you fixated on the deliberate part. That's the offence in the law. So that's what it is

    taniwharugbyT CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    replied to Steven Harris on last edited by
    #233

    @steven-harris said in Hurricanes v Reds:

    Funny how goo

    Agreed, 100%.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #234

    @chris he pushed it dead it wasn't a downward motion.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • A Online
    A Online
    African Monkey
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #235

    @crucial I guess it's taken out of the equation due to the foul play in the first place?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #236

    @kiwimurph said in Hurricanes v Reds:

    @chris he pushed it dead it wasn't a downward motion.

    Nah disagree

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #237

    @taniwharugby said in Hurricanes v Reds:

    With Kirifi and Laumape the canes have 2 of the most over rated players in NZ

    Both have had storming games today. I think most people rate them appropriately - they are good players but limited.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Rebound on last edited by
    #238

    @rebound i guess because that was the difference between no try and a PT and YC?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #239

    Coles finally gets a lineout right, easy try

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StagS Offline
    StagS Offline
    Stag
    replied to Toddy on last edited by
    #240

    @toddy absolute bullshit. He had every right to try and force it, and that is all that he did. The ref and TMO should be removed from duty for a decent strength after this performance.

    ToddyT antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    replied to Stag on last edited by
    #241

    @stag Yep, he did have every right. Except he fucked up and pushed it dead. I don't agree with a PT but I thought it was definitely worth a penalty.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #242

    The Hurricanes shouldn't have a man more, but glad it was Flanders dotting down.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    wrote on last edited by
    #243

    That high tackle seemed like direct contact to the head to me.

    Did the Kiwi refs miss the memo about high tackles?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Rebound on last edited by
    #244

    @rebound said in Hurricanes v Reds:

    @crucial why are you fixated on the deliberate part. That's the offence in the law. So that's what it is

    Not quite sure what the question is but when it happened I immediately called that it should be looked at.
    On the replay I thought it could go either way as to being deliberate.
    I didn’t expect a PT though.
    Another ref and it could have been a 5 metre scrum or a penalty and YC.
    I can’t see that the try would have been scored from a bouncing slippery ball and sliding player

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    4

Hurricanes v Reds
Rugby Matches
hurricanesreds
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.