Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
blueshighlanders
743 Posts 58 Posters 48.1k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nzzpN nzzp

    @canefan said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

    @nzzp said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

    @bones as a long (long) suffering Blues fan, the landers are the only side we've had the wood on over the last couple of years. Won 5 of the last 6 I think, and when we played you on EP earlier this year, there were only some ropey decisions (Akira 'forward pass') that prevented us hitting 50.

    You could see it another way - the Blues were 7.5 point favourites at the TAB, and covered the spread (just). So the game played out the way the bookies expected

    Sitting in the stands the crowd realised how close the Blues were to losing the game. The Highlanders fed off the Blues ill discipline and if they had stuck to their narrow channel of attack they might have been able to steal the game

    was impressive how the Blues came from behind to win. Didn't turn dominance into points - but did enough in the end

    P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #691

    @nzzp said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

    @canefan said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

    @nzzp said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

    @bones as a long (long) suffering Blues fan, the landers are the only side we've had the wood on over the last couple of years. Won 5 of the last 6 I think, and when we played you on EP earlier this year, there were only some ropey decisions (Akira 'forward pass') that prevented us hitting 50.

    You could see it another way - the Blues were 7.5 point favourites at the TAB, and covered the spread (just). So the game played out the way the bookies expected

    Sitting in the stands the crowd realised how close the Blues were to losing the game. The Highlanders fed off the Blues ill discipline and if they had stuck to their narrow channel of attack they might have been able to steal the game

    was impressive how the Blues came from behind to win. Didn't turn dominance into points - but did enough in the end

    That to me comes down to poor decision making by half and first five. Black standing deep takes pressure off the defence.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • BonesB Bones

      You blues fellas are all pretty uptight and angsty for winners eh!

      P Offline
      P Offline
      pakman
      wrote on last edited by
      #692

      @bones said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

      You blues fellas are all pretty uptight and angsty for winners eh!

      Well done Highlanders, for coming back from poor outcome in SRAotearoa!

      Have supplanted Chiefs as my second team.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • P pakman

        @nzzp said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

        @canefan said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

        @nzzp said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

        @bones as a long (long) suffering Blues fan, the landers are the only side we've had the wood on over the last couple of years. Won 5 of the last 6 I think, and when we played you on EP earlier this year, there were only some ropey decisions (Akira 'forward pass') that prevented us hitting 50.

        You could see it another way - the Blues were 7.5 point favourites at the TAB, and covered the spread (just). So the game played out the way the bookies expected

        Sitting in the stands the crowd realised how close the Blues were to losing the game. The Highlanders fed off the Blues ill discipline and if they had stuck to their narrow channel of attack they might have been able to steal the game

        was impressive how the Blues came from behind to win. Didn't turn dominance into points - but did enough in the end

        That to me comes down to poor decision making by half and first five. Black standing deep takes pressure off the defence.

        antipodeanA Offline
        antipodeanA Offline
        antipodean
        wrote on last edited by antipodean
        #693

        @pakman said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

        @nzzp said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

        @canefan said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

        @nzzp said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

        @bones as a long (long) suffering Blues fan, the landers are the only side we've had the wood on over the last couple of years. Won 5 of the last 6 I think, and when we played you on EP earlier this year, there were only some ropey decisions (Akira 'forward pass') that prevented us hitting 50.

        You could see it another way - the Blues were 7.5 point favourites at the TAB, and covered the spread (just). So the game played out the way the bookies expected

        Sitting in the stands the crowd realised how close the Blues were to losing the game. The Highlanders fed off the Blues ill discipline and if they had stuck to their narrow channel of attack they might have been able to steal the game

        was impressive how the Blues came from behind to win. Didn't turn dominance into points - but did enough in the end

        That to me comes down to poor decision making by half and first five. Black standing deep takes pressure off the defence.

        Before I throw Black to the wolves, I'd like to see him get more consistent time with Nock.

        Being paired with wildly inconsistent scrumhalves can't make for a confident five-eighth.

        P nzzpN 2 Replies Last reply
        2
        • antipodeanA antipodean

          @pakman said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

          @nzzp said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

          @canefan said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

          @nzzp said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

          @bones as a long (long) suffering Blues fan, the landers are the only side we've had the wood on over the last couple of years. Won 5 of the last 6 I think, and when we played you on EP earlier this year, there were only some ropey decisions (Akira 'forward pass') that prevented us hitting 50.

          You could see it another way - the Blues were 7.5 point favourites at the TAB, and covered the spread (just). So the game played out the way the bookies expected

          Sitting in the stands the crowd realised how close the Blues were to losing the game. The Highlanders fed off the Blues ill discipline and if they had stuck to their narrow channel of attack they might have been able to steal the game

          was impressive how the Blues came from behind to win. Didn't turn dominance into points - but did enough in the end

          That to me comes down to poor decision making by half and first five. Black standing deep takes pressure off the defence.

          Before I throw Black to the wolves, I'd like to see him get more consistent time with Nock.

          Being paired with wildly inconsistent scrumhalves can't make for a confident five-eighth.

          P Offline
          P Offline
          pakman
          wrote on last edited by
          #694

          @antipodean said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

          @pakman said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

          @nzzp said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

          @canefan said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

          @nzzp said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

          @bones as a long (long) suffering Blues fan, the landers are the only side we've had the wood on over the last couple of years. Won 5 of the last 6 I think, and when we played you on EP earlier this year, there were only some ropey decisions (Akira 'forward pass') that prevented us hitting 50.

          You could see it another way - the Blues were 7.5 point favourites at the TAB, and covered the spread (just). So the game played out the way the bookies expected

          Sitting in the stands the crowd realised how close the Blues were to losing the game. The Highlanders fed off the Blues ill discipline and if they had stuck to their narrow channel of attack they might have been able to steal the game

          was impressive how the Blues came from behind to win. Didn't turn dominance into points - but did enough in the end

          That to me comes down to poor decision making by half and first five. Black standing deep takes pressure off the defence.

          Before I throw Black to the wolves, I'd like to see him get more consistent time with Nock.

          Fair enough.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K kev

            @duluth said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

            I said earlier in the week that I wanted the Blues to have a 6/2 split. It was obvious that the Highlanders would attempt to tire out the big Blues pack with an extra forward sub.
            When Robinson was ruled out a 6/2 split wasn't really an option.

            It's impressive the Blues pack finished stronger. They had one less sub, plus Goodhue getting injured not long after coming on meant the second row basically played the full match.
            The Gibson try was earned through multiple players still working hard and over powering the Highlanders.

            Surprised something more hasn’t been said about Goodhue’s injury. It was a head to the rib cage looked like from the side.

            pukunuiP Offline
            pukunuiP Offline
            pukunui
            wrote on last edited by
            #695

            @kev said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

            @duluth said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

            I said earlier in the week that I wanted the Blues to have a 6/2 split. It was obvious that the Highlanders would attempt to tire out the big Blues pack with an extra forward sub.
            When Robinson was ruled out a 6/2 split wasn't really an option.

            It's impressive the Blues pack finished stronger. They had one less sub, plus Goodhue getting injured not long after coming on meant the second row basically played the full match.
            The Gibson try was earned through multiple players still working hard and over powering the Highlanders.

            Surprised something more hasn’t been said about Goodhue’s injury. It was a head to the rib cage looked like from the side.

            I can’t keep up with the laws around this but how was Pat T allowed back on the field? I thought once you were subbed off you couldn’t return unless you are a front rower coming on for an injury.

            Crazy HorseC BonesB 2 Replies Last reply
            1
            • pukunuiP pukunui

              @kev said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

              @duluth said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

              I said earlier in the week that I wanted the Blues to have a 6/2 split. It was obvious that the Highlanders would attempt to tire out the big Blues pack with an extra forward sub.
              When Robinson was ruled out a 6/2 split wasn't really an option.

              It's impressive the Blues pack finished stronger. They had one less sub, plus Goodhue getting injured not long after coming on meant the second row basically played the full match.
              The Gibson try was earned through multiple players still working hard and over powering the Highlanders.

              Surprised something more hasn’t been said about Goodhue’s injury. It was a head to the rib cage looked like from the side.

              I can’t keep up with the laws around this but how was Pat T allowed back on the field? I thought once you were subbed off you couldn’t return unless you are a front rower coming on for an injury.

              Crazy HorseC Offline
              Crazy HorseC Offline
              Crazy Horse
              wrote on last edited by
              #696

              @pukunui said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

              @kev said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

              @duluth said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

              I said earlier in the week that I wanted the Blues to have a 6/2 split. It was obvious that the Highlanders would attempt to tire out the big Blues pack with an extra forward sub.
              When Robinson was ruled out a 6/2 split wasn't really an option.

              It's impressive the Blues pack finished stronger. They had one less sub, plus Goodhue getting injured not long after coming on meant the second row basically played the full match.
              The Gibson try was earned through multiple players still working hard and over powering the Highlanders.

              Surprised something more hasn’t been said about Goodhue’s injury. It was a head to the rib cage looked like from the side.

              I can’t keep up with the laws around this but how was Pat T allowed back on the field? I thought once you were subbed off you couldn’t return unless you are a front rower coming on for an injury.

              Yeah I was wondering the same and thinking I have missed a rule change. Wasn't there a drama over something similar earlier in the season?

              KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • pukunuiP pukunui

                @kev said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                @duluth said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                I said earlier in the week that I wanted the Blues to have a 6/2 split. It was obvious that the Highlanders would attempt to tire out the big Blues pack with an extra forward sub.
                When Robinson was ruled out a 6/2 split wasn't really an option.

                It's impressive the Blues pack finished stronger. They had one less sub, plus Goodhue getting injured not long after coming on meant the second row basically played the full match.
                The Gibson try was earned through multiple players still working hard and over powering the Highlanders.

                Surprised something more hasn’t been said about Goodhue’s injury. It was a head to the rib cage looked like from the side.

                I can’t keep up with the laws around this but how was Pat T allowed back on the field? I thought once you were subbed off you couldn’t return unless you are a front rower coming on for an injury.

                BonesB Offline
                BonesB Offline
                Bones
                wrote on last edited by
                #697

                @pukunui said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                @kev said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                @duluth said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                I said earlier in the week that I wanted the Blues to have a 6/2 split. It was obvious that the Highlanders would attempt to tire out the big Blues pack with an extra forward sub.
                When Robinson was ruled out a 6/2 split wasn't really an option.

                It's impressive the Blues pack finished stronger. They had one less sub, plus Goodhue getting injured not long after coming on meant the second row basically played the full match.
                The Gibson try was earned through multiple players still working hard and over powering the Highlanders.

                Surprised something more hasn’t been said about Goodhue’s injury. It was a head to the rib cage looked like from the side.

                I can’t keep up with the laws around this but how was Pat T allowed back on the field? I thought once you were subbed off you couldn’t return unless you are a front rower coming on for an injury.

                IIRC if you were a tactical sub, you can come back on for an injury. Is that what happened?

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • antipodeanA antipodean

                  @pakman said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                  @nzzp said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                  @canefan said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                  @nzzp said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                  @bones as a long (long) suffering Blues fan, the landers are the only side we've had the wood on over the last couple of years. Won 5 of the last 6 I think, and when we played you on EP earlier this year, there were only some ropey decisions (Akira 'forward pass') that prevented us hitting 50.

                  You could see it another way - the Blues were 7.5 point favourites at the TAB, and covered the spread (just). So the game played out the way the bookies expected

                  Sitting in the stands the crowd realised how close the Blues were to losing the game. The Highlanders fed off the Blues ill discipline and if they had stuck to their narrow channel of attack they might have been able to steal the game

                  was impressive how the Blues came from behind to win. Didn't turn dominance into points - but did enough in the end

                  That to me comes down to poor decision making by half and first five. Black standing deep takes pressure off the defence.

                  Before I throw Black to the wolves, I'd like to see him get more consistent time with Nock.

                  Being paired with wildly inconsistent scrumhalves can't make for a confident five-eighth.

                  nzzpN Online
                  nzzpN Online
                  nzzp
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #698

                  @antipodean said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                  @pakman said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                  @nzzp said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                  @canefan said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                  @nzzp said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                  @bones as a long (long) suffering Blues fan, the landers are the only side we've had the wood on over the last couple of years. Won 5 of the last 6 I think, and when we played you on EP earlier this year, there were only some ropey decisions (Akira 'forward pass') that prevented us hitting 50.

                  You could see it another way - the Blues were 7.5 point favourites at the TAB, and covered the spread (just). So the game played out the way the bookies expected

                  Sitting in the stands the crowd realised how close the Blues were to losing the game. The Highlanders fed off the Blues ill discipline and if they had stuck to their narrow channel of attack they might have been able to steal the game

                  was impressive how the Blues came from behind to win. Didn't turn dominance into points - but did enough in the end

                  That to me comes down to poor decision making by half and first five. Black standing deep takes pressure off the defence.

                  Before I throw Black to the wolves, I'd like to see him get more consistent time with Nock.

                  Being paired with wildly inconsistent scrumhalves can't make for a confident five-eighth.

                  He's had two years, including extensive training and a decent forward pack in front of him. He's had good ball in good situations and not delivered. Not throwing a bloke to the wolves after 2 years, btu the reality is if he hasn't shown consistent quality yet, it's very unlikely he's going to start.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • BonesB Bones

                    @booboo said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                    Just feel some of @Bones's recent posts very strange and a little silky, unnecessarily so.

                    Huh, go figure. Here I am taking the piss out of nzzp for his disdain of the Highlanders and all of a sudden I've got a chip, am silky and am a crusader. I even thought @Kirwan was getting into the swing of things with his helping us get better quip, but no, he went uptight straight after.

                    If you guys wanna check back through the thread, you'll probably find I was the first to congratulate blues fans.

                    nzzpN Online
                    nzzpN Online
                    nzzp
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #699

                    @bones said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                    @booboo said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                    Just feel some of @Bones's recent posts very strange and a little silky, unnecessarily so.

                    Huh, go figure. Here I am taking the piss out of nzzp for his disdain of the Highlanders and all of a sudden I've got a chip, am silky and am a crusader. I even thought @Kirwan was getting into the swing of things with his helping us get better quip, but no, he went uptight straight after.

                    If you guys wanna check back through the thread, you'll probably find I was the first to congratulate blues fans.

                    Humour can be hard to get across.

                    Also, it's a long leap from 'Highlanders got domianted' to 'disdain for Highlanders'. I think you read too much into my posts ... they're a good side, but they really struggled in a lot of areas on Saturday night

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • Crazy HorseC Crazy Horse

                      @pukunui said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                      @kev said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                      @duluth said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                      I said earlier in the week that I wanted the Blues to have a 6/2 split. It was obvious that the Highlanders would attempt to tire out the big Blues pack with an extra forward sub.
                      When Robinson was ruled out a 6/2 split wasn't really an option.

                      It's impressive the Blues pack finished stronger. They had one less sub, plus Goodhue getting injured not long after coming on meant the second row basically played the full match.
                      The Gibson try was earned through multiple players still working hard and over powering the Highlanders.

                      Surprised something more hasn’t been said about Goodhue’s injury. It was a head to the rib cage looked like from the side.

                      I can’t keep up with the laws around this but how was Pat T allowed back on the field? I thought once you were subbed off you couldn’t return unless you are a front rower coming on for an injury.

                      Yeah I was wondering the same and thinking I have missed a rule change. Wasn't there a drama over something similar earlier in the season?

                      KirwanK Offline
                      KirwanK Offline
                      Kirwan
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #700

                      @crazy-horse said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                      @pukunui said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                      @kev said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                      @duluth said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                      I said earlier in the week that I wanted the Blues to have a 6/2 split. It was obvious that the Highlanders would attempt to tire out the big Blues pack with an extra forward sub.
                      When Robinson was ruled out a 6/2 split wasn't really an option.

                      It's impressive the Blues pack finished stronger. They had one less sub, plus Goodhue getting injured not long after coming on meant the second row basically played the full match.
                      The Gibson try was earned through multiple players still working hard and over powering the Highlanders.

                      Surprised something more hasn’t been said about Goodhue’s injury. It was a head to the rib cage looked like from the side.

                      I can’t keep up with the laws around this but how was Pat T allowed back on the field? I thought once you were subbed off you couldn’t return unless you are a front rower coming on for an injury.

                      Yeah I was wondering the same and thinking I have missed a rule change. Wasn't there a drama over something similar earlier in the season?

                      You can come back on a head knock check. I thought Goodhue had been hit in the ribs, but checking again he was another player hit in the head by the Highlanders.

                      taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • KirwanK Kirwan

                        @crazy-horse said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                        @pukunui said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                        @kev said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                        @duluth said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                        I said earlier in the week that I wanted the Blues to have a 6/2 split. It was obvious that the Highlanders would attempt to tire out the big Blues pack with an extra forward sub.
                        When Robinson was ruled out a 6/2 split wasn't really an option.

                        It's impressive the Blues pack finished stronger. They had one less sub, plus Goodhue getting injured not long after coming on meant the second row basically played the full match.
                        The Gibson try was earned through multiple players still working hard and over powering the Highlanders.

                        Surprised something more hasn’t been said about Goodhue’s injury. It was a head to the rib cage looked like from the side.

                        I can’t keep up with the laws around this but how was Pat T allowed back on the field? I thought once you were subbed off you couldn’t return unless you are a front rower coming on for an injury.

                        Yeah I was wondering the same and thinking I have missed a rule change. Wasn't there a drama over something similar earlier in the season?

                        You can come back on a head knock check. I thought Goodhue had been hit in the ribs, but checking again he was another player hit in the head by the Highlanders.

                        taniwharugbyT Offline
                        taniwharugbyT Offline
                        taniwharugby
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #701

                        @kirwan it was the rib shot that took him down wasnt it, you saw him reel back and stayed down and then went off.

                        KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                          @kirwan it was the rib shot that took him down wasnt it, you saw him reel back and stayed down and then went off.

                          KirwanK Offline
                          KirwanK Offline
                          Kirwan
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #702

                          @taniwharugby said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                          @kirwan it was the rib shot that took him down wasnt it, you saw him reel back and stayed down and then went off.

                          Nope, that's what the commentators thought they saw. He got hit directly in the head, and got taken off for HIA after they checked his neck.

                          Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • KiwiwombleK Online
                            KiwiwombleK Online
                            Kiwiwomble
                            wrote on last edited by Kiwiwomble
                            #703

                            Just saw this, hadn't thought about it before, good on him once again for giving it his all, hell of a send off assuming he's not coming back

                            alt text

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            4
                            • KirwanK Kirwan

                              @taniwharugby said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                              @kirwan it was the rib shot that took him down wasnt it, you saw him reel back and stayed down and then went off.

                              Nope, that's what the commentators thought they saw. He got hit directly in the head, and got taken off for HIA after they checked his neck.

                              Crazy HorseC Offline
                              Crazy HorseC Offline
                              Crazy Horse
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #704

                              @kirwan said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                              @taniwharugby said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                              @kirwan it was the rib shot that took him down wasnt it, you saw him reel back and stayed down and then went off.

                              Nope, that's what the commentators thought they saw. He got hit directly in the head, and got taken off for HIA after they checked his neck.

                              I did see them doing the neck thing at the time and wondered if it was a head knock. Then the replay looked like he had copped one in the ribs...

                              KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Crazy HorseC Crazy Horse

                                @kirwan said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                                @taniwharugby said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                                @kirwan it was the rib shot that took him down wasnt it, you saw him reel back and stayed down and then went off.

                                Nope, that's what the commentators thought they saw. He got hit directly in the head, and got taken off for HIA after they checked his neck.

                                I did see them doing the neck thing at the time and wondered if it was a head knock. Then the replay looked like he had copped one in the ribs...

                                KirwanK Offline
                                KirwanK Offline
                                Kirwan
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #705

                                @crazy-horse said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                                @kirwan said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                                @taniwharugby said in SR T-T FINAL: Blues v Highlanders:

                                @kirwan it was the rib shot that took him down wasnt it, you saw him reel back and stayed down and then went off.

                                Nope, that's what the commentators thought they saw. He got hit directly in the head, and got taken off for HIA after they checked his neck.

                                I did see them doing the neck thing at the time and wondered if it was a head knock. Then the replay looked like he had copped one in the ribs...

                                It’s the left shoulder that hit the head, the behind shot doesn’t show it well.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • TimT Away
                                  TimT Away
                                  Tim
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #706

                                  Might have gone under reported this year how important Hunt has been to the Highlanders. Much better 10 than Ioane, even if the latter can show his skills more dramatically occasionally.

                                  Might be time for Josh Ioane to cash in.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  3
                                  • TimT Away
                                    TimT Away
                                    Tim
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #707

                                    I am biased to Hunt, as he is a graduate of Auckland University's engineering school, but he's put in some big games for the Highlanders.

                                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • KiwiwombleK Online
                                      KiwiwombleK Online
                                      Kiwiwomble
                                      wrote on last edited by Kiwiwomble
                                      #708

                                      Agreed, I saw some post hunts started every game bar one since RD.1 last year, the team slowly stabilised around him

                                      I think ioane has shown enough at 15 that he could work if he refocused as a 15 that can cover 10…but yes, it’s getting close to make of break for him

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • KiwiMurphK Online
                                        KiwiMurphK Online
                                        KiwiMurph
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #709

                                        I thought Hunt was pretty good on Saturday for a team getting beaten up front.

                                        There was one moment where he tried to run out of his 22 instead of kick when it wasn't on and I think he did a dopey shove to give away a penalty but was otherwise good.

                                        KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                                          I thought Hunt was pretty good on Saturday for a team getting beaten up front.

                                          There was one moment where he tried to run out of his 22 instead of kick when it wasn't on and I think he did a dopey shove to give away a penalty but was otherwise good.

                                          KiwiwombleK Online
                                          KiwiwombleK Online
                                          Kiwiwomble
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #710

                                          @kiwimurph yeah, pretty obvious frustrated brain explosion, it’s was a good play until then

                                          TimT 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search