Wallabies v France 3

[NTA]

@mackerzzzz said in Wallabies v France 3:

@nta said in Wallabies v France 3:

@chimoaus said in Wallabies v France 3:

It's just odd as we have had these rules for a number of years now and I haven't really seen any reduction. If anything I have come to expect yellows every game.

They changed the framework 2 years back and now it's a focus

But every game seems to have different rulings.

Interpretations

That's why they call them Laws of Rugby not Rules of Rugby

[Tim]

Swinton has been good.

[Mackerzzzz]

@nta said in Wallabies v France 3:

@mackerzzzz said in Wallabies v France 3:

@nta said in Wallabies v France 3:

@chimoaus said in Wallabies v France 3:

It's just odd as we have had these rules for a number of years now and I haven't really seen any reduction. If anything I have come to expect yellows every game.

They changed the framework 2 years back and now it's a focus

But every game seems to have different rulings.

Interpretations

That's why they call them Laws of Rugby not Rules of Rugby

Yes but you cant have interpretations that big like that. 99% of decent refs would hardy call that a penalty

[NTA]

High tackle by Mr Hollywood.

[Kirwan]

Hooper pressuring the ref brilliantly there

[Kirwan]

@nta said in Wallabies v France 3:

High tackle by Mr Hollywood.

Is it a Hollywood if you get a shoulder to the jaw with force?

[Stargazer]

There's no way that should even be a penalty.

[chimoaus]

Credit to Wallabies, ruck work has been pretty good.

[NTA]

@kirwan said in Wallabies v France 3:

@nta said in Wallabies v France 3:

High tackle by Mr Hollywood.

Is it a Hollywood if you get a shoulder to the jaw with force?

It is if you grab your forehead instead of your jaw

[ACT Crusader]

@kirwan said in Wallabies v France 3:

@nta said in Wallabies v France 3:

High tackle by Mr Hollywood.

Is it a Hollywood if you get a shoulder to the jaw with force?

Especially from a unit like Marika!

[Kirwan]

@nta said in Wallabies v France 3:

@kirwan said in Wallabies v France 3:

@nta said in Wallabies v France 3:

High tackle by Mr Hollywood.

Is it a Hollywood if you get a shoulder to the jaw with force?

It is if you grab your forehead instead of your jaw

He grabbed his nose.

[Anonymous]

@nta I've never seen a judge on the field, so I feel like they're just trying excuse less than consistent applications of the law

[Mackerzzzz]

@kirwan said in Wallabies v France 3:

@nta said in Wallabies v France 3:

High tackle by Mr Hollywood.

Is it a Hollywood if you get a shoulder to the jaw with force?

Walk out of it fine a 10 seconds later fall over holding your eyes?... I'd say yes

[Kiwiwomble]

@mackerzzzz said in Wallabies v France 3:

@kirwan said in Wallabies v France 3:

@nta said in Wallabies v France 3:

High tackle by Mr Hollywood.

Is it a Hollywood if you get a shoulder to the jaw with force?

Walk out of it fine a 10 seconds later fall over holding your eyes?... I'd say yes

Not even in slow mo

[Yeetyaah]

Sorry but how was that not Aussie ball after the maul?

[Kirwan]

@yeetyaah said in Wallabies v France 3:

Sorry but how was that not Aussie ball after the maul?

From a kick.

[chimoaus]

If we had the 20 minute rule we would be back to 15 each around now which seems fair.

[Kirwan]

@chimoaus said in Wallabies v France 3:

If we had the 20 minute rule we would be back to 15 each around now which seems fair.

Which would be sanity.

[Nevorian]

@act-crusader said in Wallabies v France 3:

@canes4life Marika still could’ve gone around the legs

Exactly he made no attempt to go low in the tackle

[NTA]

@kirwan said in Wallabies v France 3:

@nta said in Wallabies v France 3:

@kirwan said in Wallabies v France 3:

@nta said in Wallabies v France 3:

High tackle by Mr Hollywood.

Is it a Hollywood if you get a shoulder to the jaw with force?

It is if you grab your forehead instead of your jaw

He grabbed his nose.

My mistake.

I often confuse my nose for my jaw