• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Wallabies v France 3

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
australiafrance
637 Posts 53 Posters 32.6k Views
Wallabies v France 3
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #225

    Stupid commentator. First question is about the Marika penalty.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Away
    ChrisC Away
    Chris
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #226

    @nta said in Wallabies v France 3:

    @chris said in Wallabies v France 3:

    McDermott is a massive step up from Gordon.

    Overall but also thrown a couple of serious Hospital passes

    Creates though, Gordon is ponderous behind the pack.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steven Harris
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by Steven Harris
    #227

    @kirwan but in real time the knock on was so obvious

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #228

    @canes4life said in Wallabies v France 3:

    @act-crusader his head was coming down. Anyway who cares about the slow motion replay, I think that’s where the refs get it so wrong, there is no factoring in that players literally have a split second to make a decision. Because there was no malice it should no way be a red card. Penalty at the very most IMO.

    There is no leeway for being reckless.

    The main problem is the lack of the 20 minute red card.

    M Canes4lifeC 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #229

    20 all tho, wallas should be fired up

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Steven Harris on last edited by
    #230

    @steven-harris said in Wallabies v France 3:

    @kirwan but in real time the knock on was so obvious

    It’s BOK, of course he missed in real time.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #231

    I thought BOK had improved earlier this year.

    Back to his worst.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #232

    @nta said in Wallabies v France 3:

    That hole was created by BPA clearing blue 5 well past the ruck

    That’s happened a bit. Aussie forwards are being nice and aggressive.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4life
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #233

    @kirwan the laws need to be re-worded then because that’s disgraceful. I’m all for making the game as safe as possible but at the end of the day these guys are playing a contact sport and knocks like that happen. Aslong as there is no malice in the act of making a tackle like that, it should never be a red.

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mackerzzzz
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #234

    @kirwan said in Wallabies v France 3:

    @canes4life said in Wallabies v France 3:

    @act-crusader his head was coming down. Anyway who cares about the slow motion replay, I think that’s where the refs get it so wrong, there is no factoring in that players literally have a split second to make a decision. Because there was no malice it should no way be a red card. Penalty at the very most IMO.

    There is no leeway for being reckless.

    The main problem is the lack of the 20 minute red card.

    It wasn't reckless. He came in to make a big ribs shot and jelonch bent and he happend to hit him high. What are players supposed to do?

    Or do you want to take the big hits out of the game?...

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steven Harris
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by Steven Harris
    #235

    @canes4life always knew you were the voice of reason 😜

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4life
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #236

    @kirwan looked like a cracking hit from where I’m sitting. Might aswell be playing touch rugby mate.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Mackerzzzz on last edited by
    #237

    @mackerzzzz said in Wallabies v France 3:

    @kirwan said in Wallabies v France 3:

    @canes4life said in Wallabies v France 3:

    @act-crusader his head was coming down. Anyway who cares about the slow motion replay, I think that’s where the refs get it so wrong, there is no factoring in that players literally have a split second to make a decision. Because there was no malice it should no way be a red card. Penalty at the very most IMO.

    There is no leeway for being reckless.

    The main problem is the lack of the 20 minute red card.

    It wasn't reckless. He came in to make a big ribs shot and jelonch bent and he happend to hit him high. What are players supposed to do?

    Or do you want to take the big hits out of the game?...

    I want players to avoid what’s happened to Steve Devine after they finish playing.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #238

    @canes4life said in Wallabies v France 3:

    @kirwan looked like a cracking hit from where I’m sitting. Might aswell be playing touch rugby mate.

    Shoulders to the jaw have never been legal.

    Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    wrote on last edited by
    #239

    I guess the interpretation of mitigating is what is up for debate. The French player had his knees bent and leaning forward. When does it become mitigating?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    wrote on last edited by
    #240

    "Sonny, you've been here before..."

    "Mine was probably slightly worse..."

    🤣

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by Rancid Schnitzel
    #241

    SBW should be seen but not heard. Hopeless.
    Campo looking ancient. Guess he’s getting on.

    The chicks are impressive. Nice contrast due to the fact they have some personality and talent in front of the camera. Horwell ffs.

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #242

    @canes4life said in Wallabies v France 3:

    You can argue all day about Marika making contact to the head and not being low enough in the tackle but fuck me, this is pro International Rugby for Christ’s sake. The player was falling into the tackle and there was absolute no malice in the tackle what so ever, surely that should be a factor in the ref’s decision making.

    These referees are so by the book it’s pretty much robotic decision making. Disgraceful referring in my eyes and they should be held accountable for destroying a spectacle.

    Leader for the worst post of the night.

    The refs are "too by the book"? Maybe you should message them bro and tell them to interpret the laws the way you see them???

    We see heaps of tackles where a defender in the line has to make a split second decision - an attacker ducks, side steps, whatever. But this was a defender taking a big run up, lining a bloke up for a big hit. He had every opportunity to low, and he hardly bent his legs.

    And SBW can just fuck right off with his justification of "but the guy "can get up and play so it's all good'

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • KiwiwombleK Online
    KiwiwombleK Online
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #243

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Wallabies v France 3:

    SBW should be seen but not heard. Hopeless.
    Campo looking ancient. Guess he’s getting on.

    Old man looks old…amazing insight 😉

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #244

    SBW trying to justify high shots perhaps remembering his role in the drawn Lions series from 2017?

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Wallabies v France 3
Rugby Matches
australiafrance
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.