Wallabies vs Springboks I

[MiketheSnow]

Oz can win against 14

[SidBarret]

19 – Marco van Staden (Leicester Tigers) – 6 caps, 0 pts
20 – Kwagga Smith (Yamaha Júbilo) – 12 caps, 5 pts (1t)
21 – Jasper Wiese (Leicester Tigers) – 5 caps, 0 pts

Why? Three very similar loose forwards, would have preferred an extra back and/or another lock on the bench

Also would preferred Fassi to Nkosi, I think Fassi is something special and we need to get him on the field more.

[nostrildamus]

@oompb said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

Springbok team to face Australia in Gold Coast:
7 – Franco Mostert (Honda Heat) – 44 caps, 5pts (1t)

Great details, thanks.

[junior]

@l_n_p said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

I've watched Bledisloe 3 a couple of times but with my AB eye-patch on :winking_face:

I don't really get the Aussie tactics. Playing the AB's at their own game as they did seems insane, the result was pretty much what you'd expect.

Especially with the Boks next up, why did they not try a tighter more set-piece (yes defensive) orientated game. Perhaps it would have been damage limitation but occasionally you get lucky. The aussie backs look either pretty average or pretty inexperienced (or both) at the moment.

For all the hyping of Tate McDermott, he has a slow pass with limited range. And his running game doesn't bring others into play ... perhaps says more about aussie team than him. Noah Lolisio may be good in time but in NZ rugby he would probably be treated more like Zarn Sullivan i.e. give him time to develop (and Zarn, from what I've seen, may have that ultimate gift for a 10, he always seems to have time).

I'd have Nick White at 9 versus the Boks. Decent pass. Brings his forwards in better. Better kicking game. There are no decent options at 10 until JOC is back and JOC is still only a safe pair of hands at 10.

I don't envy Dave Rennie tbh.

Dave's big problem is that Aussie sports / rugby fans will never get behind a team that plays "pragmatic" rugby. They love a winner that plays hard and pushes boundaries, but they really hate dour, defence-first, conservative teams. It's probably part of the national psyche that their sports teams, and people, are meant to have a crack.

[booboo]

@act-crusader said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

@booboo said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

@oompb 6-2 bench?

Edit: so don't expect too much razzle-dazzle

Damian Willemse covers 1st 5, 2nd 5 and fullback.

If one of their wingers go off Lukhanyo Am covers wing and Willemse comes on to 2nd 5 and de Allande moves to centre.

@g-man said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

@act-crusader said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

@booboo said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

@oompb 6-2 bench?

Edit: so don't expect too much razzle-dazzle

Damian Willemse covers 1st 5, 2nd 5 and fullback.

If one of their wingers go off Lukhanyo Am covers wing and Willemse comes on to 2nd 5 and de Allande moves to centre.

Kwagga can also cover a position or 2 in the backline if needs be.

I revkon this is kind of making my point. The backs are there as cover. A necessary evil. Not to provide impact.

That bench screams 10 man rugby to me, perhaps even 9 man.

[booboo]

@sidbarret said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

19 – Marco van Staden (Leicester Tigers) – 6 caps, 0 pts
20 – Kwagga Smith (Yamaha Júbilo) – 12 caps, 5 pts (1t)
21 – Jasper Wiese (Leicester Tigers) – 5 caps, 0 pts

Why? Three very similar loose forwards, would have preferred an extra back and/or another lock on the bench

Also would preferred Fassi to Nkosi, I think Fassi is something special and we need to get him on the field more.

Wouldn't have thought Kwagga was that similar?

[OomPB]

@booboo van Staden is a proper 6 (NZ 7) Glad he get a crack at the Wallabies.

[NTA]

@booboo I'm complex.

[Frye]

@booboo said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

I revkon this is kind of making my point. The backs are there as cover. A necessary evil. Not to provide impact.
That bench screams 10 man rugby to me, perhaps even 9 man.

I think a 6-2 man bench isn't necessarily a negative tactic, just a realistic one given the way the game is played currently. In general I think you're going to get more output from another loosie rather than a midfielder.

Anyway Willemse as 10 backup looks a bit of a gamble. He has been a bit flaky so far at test level and doesn't have a lot of experience at 10. Hope Pollard doesn't get injured.

[antipodean]

@junior said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

@l_n_p said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

I've watched Bledisloe 3 a couple of times but with my AB eye-patch on :winking_face:

I don't really get the Aussie tactics. Playing the AB's at their own game as they did seems insane, the result was pretty much what you'd expect.

Especially with the Boks next up, why did they not try a tighter more set-piece (yes defensive) orientated game. Perhaps it would have been damage limitation but occasionally you get lucky. The aussie backs look either pretty average or pretty inexperienced (or both) at the moment.

For all the hyping of Tate McDermott, he has a slow pass with limited range. And his running game doesn't bring others into play ... perhaps says more about aussie team than him. Noah Lolisio may be good in time but in NZ rugby he would probably be treated more like Zarn Sullivan i.e. give him time to develop (and Zarn, from what I've seen, may have that ultimate gift for a 10, he always seems to have time).

I'd have Nick White at 9 versus the Boks. Decent pass. Brings his forwards in better. Better kicking game. There are no decent options at 10 until JOC is back and JOC is still only a safe pair of hands at 10.

I don't envy Dave Rennie tbh.

Dave's big problem is that Aussie sports / rugby fans will never get behind a team that plays "pragmatic" rugby. They love a winner that plays hard and pushes boundaries, but they really hate dour, defence-first, conservative teams. It's probably part of the national psyche that their sports teams, and people, are meant to have a crack.

Slightly OT, but I get the feeling that if the Wallabies played nine man rugby to win the Bledisloe, they'd be singing the praises of "proper rugby".

And then quickly complain about not running it the next season.

[NTA]

Ah, memories...

https://twitter.com/wallabies/status/1435806176793411587?s=20

[Smuts]

@antipodean yup. But to play 9 man rugby you now need 13 mean bastards capable of doing the damage.

As someone said upthread, short of significant systemic change Oz isn’t likely to produce that many mongrels at once any time soon.

For different reasons SA has the opposite problem. I can’t remember a time when the boks had more than a pair of international caliber centres available for selection. And we’ve had long stretches when we fielded none (we put Jorrie Muller onto an international pitch!)

Ditto flyhalves. And fullbacks.

So it’s lucky that most of the SA rugby public are more than satisfied to win a tryless match by a dodgy dropgoal so long as, to paraphrase a great filmmaker, the boks fucked the opposition up, physically.

[Smuts]

@booboo Nonsense. Without backs who would collect the intercepts that seem to be the fulcrum on which Rennie’s strategy pivots?

[SidBarret]

@smuts I have theory as why we struggle to produce centres as compared to say locks. When they select the craven week teams (especially here in the WC) they only look at the big three schools. It is far harder to miss a 6'8 guy from Tygerberg than it is a center playing in for Bellville.

[junior]

@antipodean said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

@junior said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

@l_n_p said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

I've watched Bledisloe 3 a couple of times but with my AB eye-patch on :winking_face:

I don't really get the Aussie tactics. Playing the AB's at their own game as they did seems insane, the result was pretty much what you'd expect.

Especially with the Boks next up, why did they not try a tighter more set-piece (yes defensive) orientated game. Perhaps it would have been damage limitation but occasionally you get lucky. The aussie backs look either pretty average or pretty inexperienced (or both) at the moment.

For all the hyping of Tate McDermott, he has a slow pass with limited range. And his running game doesn't bring others into play ... perhaps says more about aussie team than him. Noah Lolisio may be good in time but in NZ rugby he would probably be treated more like Zarn Sullivan i.e. give him time to develop (and Zarn, from what I've seen, may have that ultimate gift for a 10, he always seems to have time).

I'd have Nick White at 9 versus the Boks. Decent pass. Brings his forwards in better. Better kicking game. There are no decent options at 10 until JOC is back and JOC is still only a safe pair of hands at 10.

I don't envy Dave Rennie tbh.

Dave's big problem is that Aussie sports / rugby fans will never get behind a team that plays "pragmatic" rugby. They love a winner that plays hard and pushes boundaries, but they really hate dour, defence-first, conservative teams. It's probably part of the national psyche that their sports teams, and people, are meant to have a crack.

Slightly OT, but I get the feeling that if the Wallabies played nine man rugby to win the Bledisloe, they'd be singing the praises of "proper rugby".

And then quickly complain about not running it the next season.

You're probably right. Any "tolerance" of pragmatism will be fairly short-lived even if it leads to them winning because they like to win the right way

[junior]

@sidbarret said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

@smuts I have theory as why we struggle to produce centres as compared to say locks. When they select the craven week teams (especially here in the WC) they only look at the big three schools. It is far harder to miss a 6'8 guy from Tygerberg than it is a center playing in for Bellville.

Am I missing something here? In my rugby lifetime, I can remember the following Springbok midfielders, all of whom were pretty decent: Danie Gerber, Hennie Le Roux, Jaapie Mulder, Pieter Muller, Marius Joubert (in combination with De Wet Barry), Jacques Fourie, Jean De Villiers, Kriel, De Allende and Am.

[Bones]

@junior said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

@l_n_p said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

I've watched Bledisloe 3 a couple of times but with my AB eye-patch on :winking_face:

I don't really get the Aussie tactics. Playing the AB's at their own game as they did seems insane, the result was pretty much what you'd expect.

Especially with the Boks next up, why did they not try a tighter more set-piece (yes defensive) orientated game. Perhaps it would have been damage limitation but occasionally you get lucky. The aussie backs look either pretty average or pretty inexperienced (or both) at the moment.

For all the hyping of Tate McDermott, he has a slow pass with limited range. And his running game doesn't bring others into play ... perhaps says more about aussie team than him. Noah Lolisio may be good in time but in NZ rugby he would probably be treated more like Zarn Sullivan i.e. give him time to develop (and Zarn, from what I've seen, may have that ultimate gift for a 10, he always seems to have time).

I'd have Nick White at 9 versus the Boks. Decent pass. Brings his forwards in better. Better kicking game. There are no decent options at 10 until JOC is back and JOC is still only a safe pair of hands at 10.

I don't envy Dave Rennie tbh.

Dave's big problem is that Aussie sports / rugby fans will never get behind a team that plays "pragmatic" rugby. They love a winner that plays hard and pushes boundaries, but they really hate dour, defence-first, conservative teams. It's probably part of the national psyche that their sports teams, and people, are meant to have a crack.

Not sure that's a big problem for Dave is it? Can't say when I think of teams he's coached, I think "pragmatic".

[pakman]

The Boks feed off mistakes. I think I’d start with To’omua at 10 with Lolesio to come off bench.

Also, Boks defence struggles with 10 who plays flat, that would be the way I’d want them to play.

Need best scrummaging hooker (BPA?) to start. Mbonambi Is the key to Bok scrum. The first half scrums will be a searching examination, so also start best scrummaging locks. @NTA best placed to fill in names!

[booboo]

@frye said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

@booboo said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

I revkon this is kind of making my point. The backs are there as cover. A necessary evil. Not to provide impact.
That bench screams 10 man rugby to me, perhaps even 9 man.

I think a 6-2 man bench isn't necessarily a negative tactic, just a realistic one given the way the game is played currently. In general I think you're going to get more output from another loosie rather than a midfielder.

Anyway Willemse as 10 backup looks a bit of a gamble. He has been a bit flaky so far at test level and doesn't have a lot of experience at 10. Hope Pollard doesn't get injured.

Didn't say negative. Just said not razzle dazzle.

I'm saying it's telegraphing how they will attack.

Really doesnt matter that everyone knows what they're doing. If they bring the bash like they want they'll be damned hard to beat.

[Smuts]

@junior said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

@sidbarret said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

@smuts I have theory as why we struggle to produce centres as compared to say locks. When they select the craven week teams (especially here in the WC) they only look at the big three schools. It is far harder to miss a 6'8 guy from Tygerberg than it is a center playing in for Bellville.

Am I missing something here? In my rugby lifetime, I can remember the following Springbok midfielders, all of whom were pretty decent: Danie Gerber, Hennie Le Roux, Jaapie Mulder, Pieter Muller, Marius Joubert (in combination with De Wet Barry), Jacques Fourie, Jean De Villiers, Kriel, De Allende and Am.

3 of those were (or in Mirrors Kriel’s case: is) extremely limited. But my point was really that the drop off from that short list has always been extremely steep (even if you missed Muir, Venter, Snyman and for the blink of an eye Stewart.)