Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Wallabies vs Springboks I

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
australiaspringboks
911 Posts 66 Posters 56.2k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

    long game made enjoyable by being close the whole time.

    The Boks are funny aye? They play a negative "you have the ball" style, but strangely they aren't actually ruthlessly efficient, so the door is always there for a team who can get a few points. They are good on the ground, and that maul is pretty sexy, but that's it. For all the talk of their physical pack, they don't exactly roll over you with the ball, the wallabies sat them down hard all night.

    Quade playing a calm hand, Kerevi being a constant threat, and Valetini playing his best test kept Aus in this. It was a bloody good win.

    I actually really like the draw this year, where the same teams get to play each other a week later, i reckon it adds heaps to the comp. Next week will be very interesting, both sides know exactly what they need to do better.

    NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #857

    @mariner4life said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

    For all the talk of their physical pack, they don't exactly roll over you with the ball, the wallabies sat them down hard all night.

    Wallabies pack at present is much more physical than historically. And we looked fitter than the Boks to boot.

    Will have to watch the game again, but Rodda's name wasn't mentioned much, so assume he was in there doing the dirty work.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • antipodeanA Offline
      antipodeanA Offline
      antipodean
      wrote on last edited by
      #858

      If you're going to kick away almost all your possession, your chase and ability to compete and regather needs to be much better. As does your set piece. South Africa also suffered from some truly bizarre brain farts by players.

      NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • antipodeanA antipodean

        If you're going to kick away almost all your possession, your chase and ability to compete and regather needs to be much better. As does your set piece. South Africa also suffered from some truly bizarre brain farts by players.

        NTAN Offline
        NTAN Offline
        NTA
        wrote on last edited by
        #859

        @antipodean said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

        If you're going to kick away almost all your possession, your chase and ability to compete and regather needs to be much better. As does your set piece. South Africa also suffered from some truly bizarre brain farts by players.

        Offloads under pressure over the sideline were rubbish.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • barbarianB Offline
          barbarianB Offline
          barbarian
          wrote on last edited by
          #860

          Very happy with the win. A funny sort of a game, a real clash of styles.

          I think the Boks game plan doesn't fit the amount of talent they have, especially in the backs. Guys like Am, Mapimpi, Le Roux, are purely there as kick chasers and it's such a waste. I found them very tough to watch, especially when they started launching kicks within 30m of our line.

          We hung in well, though we were our own worst enemy at times. Folau Faingaa's YC was among the stupidest I've seen. Swinton was lucky not to see yellow as well.

          Happy for Quade, happy for Rennie. It was a win we really needed to keep the momentum going from the France series. Now 2nd in the RC is a real possibility, which would be nice.

          NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
          10
          • barbarianB barbarian

            Very happy with the win. A funny sort of a game, a real clash of styles.

            I think the Boks game plan doesn't fit the amount of talent they have, especially in the backs. Guys like Am, Mapimpi, Le Roux, are purely there as kick chasers and it's such a waste. I found them very tough to watch, especially when they started launching kicks within 30m of our line.

            We hung in well, though we were our own worst enemy at times. Folau Faingaa's YC was among the stupidest I've seen. Swinton was lucky not to see yellow as well.

            Happy for Quade, happy for Rennie. It was a win we really needed to keep the momentum going from the France series. Now 2nd in the RC is a real possibility, which would be nice.

            NTAN Offline
            NTAN Offline
            NTA
            wrote on last edited by
            #861

            @barbarian said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

            Folau Faingaa's YC was among the stupidest I've seen.

            Only a matter of time. I said it was stupid on Twitter when he did it in SRAu and even Laurie Fisher was defending him.

            BovidaeB P 2 Replies Last reply
            1
            • NTAN NTA

              @barbarian said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

              Folau Faingaa's YC was among the stupidest I've seen.

              Only a matter of time. I said it was stupid on Twitter when he did it in SRAu and even Laurie Fisher was defending him.

              BovidaeB Offline
              BovidaeB Offline
              Bovidae
              wrote on last edited by
              #862

              @nta said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

              @barbarian said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

              Folau Faingaa's YC was among the stupidest I've seen.

              Only a matter of time. I said it was stupid on Twitter when he did it in SRAu and even Laurie Fisher was defending him.

              He seemed surprised himself that it was even a penalty. IIRC his response to Pearce was "that's shocking". A total lack of self-awareness.

              ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • nzzpN nzzp

                @mariner4life it's really weird - like Aus is the SA kryptonite. For such a physical team, they just seem to struggle with the Australian style in Australia.

                Big win for World Rugby though. SA suddenly don't look the behemoth they were over the last few years not playing

                Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
                Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
                Rancid Schnitzel
                wrote on last edited by
                #863

                @nzzp said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                @mariner4life it's really weird - like Aus is the SA kryptonite. For such a physical team, they just seem to struggle with the Australian style in Australia.

                Big win for World Rugby though. SA suddenly don't look the behemoth they were over the last few years not playing

                To be fair that lable only really relates to one game. Yes it was a RWC final and that was a great performance but it's not like they were dishing it out before that. We beat them comfortably in the group game and they just scraped by Wales in the Semi. The argument can also be made that England seriously blew their load in the other semifinal.

                Not saying that aren't a very good side but the way people have been fapping on about them you'd think they'd been this unstoppable dominant force. That is simply not true.

                OomPBO MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
                7
                • nzzpN Offline
                  nzzpN Offline
                  nzzp
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #864

                  @rancid-schnitzel said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                  Not saying that aren't a very good side but the way people have been fapping on about them you'd think they'd been this unstoppable dominant force. That is simply not true.

                  I phrased my words poorly - I meant they got perceived as more of a behemoth by not playing.

                  They were very good though. Saying we beat them easily in group play is a bit of a simplification - we had 5 minutes of magic (thanks Sevu), and that was enough to hold them off. They played really well in the Final in particular.

                  But, they were a good side, and beating the Lions was a good effort. But again - they haven't played since 2019, so you can look better and better as the flaws in other game plans get exposed.

                  Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
                  5
                  • BovidaeB Bovidae

                    @nta said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                    @barbarian said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                    Folau Faingaa's YC was among the stupidest I've seen.

                    Only a matter of time. I said it was stupid on Twitter when he did it in SRAu and even Laurie Fisher was defending him.

                    He seemed surprised himself that it was even a penalty. IIRC his response to Pearce was "that's shocking". A total lack of self-awareness.

                    ACT CrusaderA Offline
                    ACT CrusaderA Offline
                    ACT Crusader
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #865

                    @bovidae said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                    @nta said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                    @barbarian said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                    Folau Faingaa's YC was among the stupidest I've seen.

                    Only a matter of time. I said it was stupid on Twitter when he did it in SRAu and even Laurie Fisher was defending him.

                    He seemed surprised himself that it was even a penalty. IIRC his response to Pearce was "that's shocking". A total lack of self-awareness.

                    If I was Rennie I would put that segment on loop whilst making him do push-ups, and he can’t stop until he realised how dumb it was.

                    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                      @bovidae said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                      @nta said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                      @barbarian said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                      Folau Faingaa's YC was among the stupidest I've seen.

                      Only a matter of time. I said it was stupid on Twitter when he did it in SRAu and even Laurie Fisher was defending him.

                      He seemed surprised himself that it was even a penalty. IIRC his response to Pearce was "that's shocking". A total lack of self-awareness.

                      If I was Rennie I would put that segment on loop whilst making him do push-ups, and he can’t stop until he realised how dumb it was.

                      antipodeanA Offline
                      antipodeanA Offline
                      antipodean
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #866

                      @act-crusader said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                      @bovidae said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                      @nta said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                      @barbarian said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                      Folau Faingaa's YC was among the stupidest I've seen.

                      Only a matter of time. I said it was stupid on Twitter when he did it in SRAu and even Laurie Fisher was defending him.

                      He seemed surprised himself that it was even a penalty. IIRC his response to Pearce was "that's shocking". A total lack of self-awareness.

                      If I was Rennie I would put that segment on loop whilst making him do push-ups, and he can’t stop until he realised how dumb it was.

                      He's going to get good at push ups.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      • Rancid SchnitzelR Rancid Schnitzel

                        @nzzp said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                        @mariner4life it's really weird - like Aus is the SA kryptonite. For such a physical team, they just seem to struggle with the Australian style in Australia.

                        Big win for World Rugby though. SA suddenly don't look the behemoth they were over the last few years not playing

                        To be fair that lable only really relates to one game. Yes it was a RWC final and that was a great performance but it's not like they were dishing it out before that. We beat them comfortably in the group game and they just scraped by Wales in the Semi. The argument can also be made that England seriously blew their load in the other semifinal.

                        Not saying that aren't a very good side but the way people have been fapping on about them you'd think they'd been this unstoppable dominant force. That is simply not true.

                        OomPBO Offline
                        OomPBO Offline
                        OomPB
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #867

                        @rancid-schnitzel that's exactly why I was worried about this test. The Springboks never play well going in a test as the favourites. The same happened against the Lions. Now they are in the perfect position to hit back as underdogs.

                        nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • Rancid SchnitzelR Rancid Schnitzel

                          @nzzp said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                          @mariner4life it's really weird - like Aus is the SA kryptonite. For such a physical team, they just seem to struggle with the Australian style in Australia.

                          Big win for World Rugby though. SA suddenly don't look the behemoth they were over the last few years not playing

                          To be fair that lable only really relates to one game. Yes it was a RWC final and that was a great performance but it's not like they were dishing it out before that. We beat them comfortably in the group game and they just scraped by Wales in the Semi. The argument can also be made that England seriously blew their load in the other semifinal.

                          Not saying that aren't a very good side but the way people have been fapping on about them you'd think they'd been this unstoppable dominant force. That is simply not true.

                          MN5M Offline
                          MN5M Offline
                          MN5
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #868

                          @rancid-schnitzel said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                          @nzzp said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                          @mariner4life it's really weird - like Aus is the SA kryptonite. For such a physical team, they just seem to struggle with the Australian style in Australia.

                          Big win for World Rugby though. SA suddenly don't look the behemoth they were over the last few years not playing

                          To be fair that lable only really relates to one game. Yes it was a RWC final and that was a great performance but it's not like they were dishing it out before that. We beat them comfortably in the group game and they just scraped by Wales in the Semi. The argument can also be made that England seriously blew their load in the other semifinal.

                          Not saying that aren't a very good side but the way people have been fapping on about them you'd think they'd been this unstoppable dominant force. That is simply not true.

                          They won the game that counted and good on them but so did England in 2003. How did they go when they toured here in 2004 again ?

                          ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • TimT Offline
                            TimT Offline
                            Tim
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #869

                            Last two years couldn't have gone much worse for Gatland eh?

                            Assume the Chiefs will stick with Clayton McMillan?

                            Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • nzzpN nzzp

                              @rancid-schnitzel said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                              Not saying that aren't a very good side but the way people have been fapping on about them you'd think they'd been this unstoppable dominant force. That is simply not true.

                              I phrased my words poorly - I meant they got perceived as more of a behemoth by not playing.

                              They were very good though. Saying we beat them easily in group play is a bit of a simplification - we had 5 minutes of magic (thanks Sevu), and that was enough to hold them off. They played really well in the Final in particular.

                              But, they were a good side, and beating the Lions was a good effort. But again - they haven't played since 2019, so you can look better and better as the flaws in other game plans get exposed.

                              Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
                              Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
                              Rancid Schnitzel
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #870

                              @nzzp said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                              @rancid-schnitzel said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                              Not saying that aren't a very good side but the way people have been fapping on about them you'd think they'd been this unstoppable dominant force. That is simply not true.

                              I phrased my words poorly - I meant they got perceived as more of a behemoth by not playing.

                              They were very good though. Saying we beat them easily in group play is a bit of a simplification - we had 5 minutes of magic (thanks Sevu), and that was enough to hold them off. They played really well in the Final in particular.

                              But, they were a good side, and beating the Lions was a good effort. But again - they haven't played since 2019, so you can look better and better as the flaws in other game plans get exposed.

                              Agreed. But point of order, I said comfortably not easily.

                              nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • TimT Tim

                                Last two years couldn't have gone much worse for Gatland eh?

                                Assume the Chiefs will stick with Clayton McMillan?

                                Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
                                Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
                                Rancid Schnitzel
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #871

                                @tim said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                Last two years couldn't have gone much worse for Gatland eh?

                                Assume the Chiefs will stick with Clayton McMillan?

                                What's his record with the Chiefs again? Has completely slipped my mind......

                                HoorooH Crazy HorseC 2 Replies Last reply
                                2
                                • Rancid SchnitzelR Rancid Schnitzel

                                  @tim said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                  Last two years couldn't have gone much worse for Gatland eh?

                                  Assume the Chiefs will stick with Clayton McMillan?

                                  What's his record with the Chiefs again? Has completely slipped my mind......

                                  HoorooH Offline
                                  HoorooH Offline
                                  Hooroo
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #872

                                  @rancid-schnitzel said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                  @tim said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                  Last two years couldn't have gone much worse for Gatland eh?

                                  Assume the Chiefs will stick with Clayton McMillan?

                                  What's his record with the Chiefs again? Has completely slipped my mind......

                                  Gah! You made me look. I had somehow completely forgotten about his awfulness

                                  nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • Rancid SchnitzelR Rancid Schnitzel

                                    @tim said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                    Last two years couldn't have gone much worse for Gatland eh?

                                    Assume the Chiefs will stick with Clayton McMillan?

                                    What's his record with the Chiefs again? Has completely slipped my mind......

                                    Crazy HorseC Offline
                                    Crazy HorseC Offline
                                    Crazy Horse
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #873

                                    @rancid-schnitzel said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                    @tim said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                    Last two years couldn't have gone much worse for Gatland eh?

                                    Assume the Chiefs will stick with Clayton McMillan?

                                    What's his record with the Chiefs again? Has completely slipped my mind......

                                    The Chiefs came last I think. You are welcome.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • Rancid SchnitzelR Rancid Schnitzel

                                      @nzzp said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                      @rancid-schnitzel said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                      Not saying that aren't a very good side but the way people have been fapping on about them you'd think they'd been this unstoppable dominant force. That is simply not true.

                                      I phrased my words poorly - I meant they got perceived as more of a behemoth by not playing.

                                      They were very good though. Saying we beat them easily in group play is a bit of a simplification - we had 5 minutes of magic (thanks Sevu), and that was enough to hold them off. They played really well in the Final in particular.

                                      But, they were a good side, and beating the Lions was a good effort. But again - they haven't played since 2019, so you can look better and better as the flaws in other game plans get exposed.

                                      Agreed. But point of order, I said comfortably not easily.

                                      nzzpN Offline
                                      nzzpN Offline
                                      nzzp
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #874

                                      @rancid-schnitzel said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                      @nzzp said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                      @rancid-schnitzel said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                      Not saying that aren't a very good side but the way people have been fapping on about them you'd think they'd been this unstoppable dominant force. That is simply not true.

                                      I phrased my words poorly - I meant they got perceived as more of a behemoth by not playing.

                                      They were very good though. Saying we beat them easily in group play is a bit of a simplification - we had 5 minutes of magic (thanks Sevu), and that was enough to hold them off. They played really well in the Final in particular.

                                      But, they were a good side, and beating the Lions was a good effort. But again - they haven't played since 2019, so you can look better and better as the flaws in other game plans get exposed.

                                      Agreed. But point of order, I said comfortably not easily.

                                      their forwards did some damage to us, same as in 2015. They are strong up front - but we pick smaller, more athletic ball players who can go 80 and help break games open

                                      No QuarterN Rancid SchnitzelR 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • MN5M MN5

                                        @rancid-schnitzel said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                        @nzzp said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                        @mariner4life it's really weird - like Aus is the SA kryptonite. For such a physical team, they just seem to struggle with the Australian style in Australia.

                                        Big win for World Rugby though. SA suddenly don't look the behemoth they were over the last few years not playing

                                        To be fair that lable only really relates to one game. Yes it was a RWC final and that was a great performance but it's not like they were dishing it out before that. We beat them comfortably in the group game and they just scraped by Wales in the Semi. The argument can also be made that England seriously blew their load in the other semifinal.

                                        Not saying that aren't a very good side but the way people have been fapping on about them you'd think they'd been this unstoppable dominant force. That is simply not true.

                                        They won the game that counted and good on them but so did England in 2003. How did they go when they toured here in 2004 again ?

                                        ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                        ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                        ACT Crusader
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #875

                                        @mn5 said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                        @rancid-schnitzel said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                        @nzzp said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                        @mariner4life it's really weird - like Aus is the SA kryptonite. For such a physical team, they just seem to struggle with the Australian style in Australia.

                                        Big win for World Rugby though. SA suddenly don't look the behemoth they were over the last few years not playing

                                        To be fair that lable only really relates to one game. Yes it was a RWC final and that was a great performance but it's not like they were dishing it out before that. We beat them comfortably in the group game and they just scraped by Wales in the Semi. The argument can also be made that England seriously blew their load in the other semifinal.

                                        Not saying that aren't a very good side but the way people have been fapping on about them you'd think they'd been this unstoppable dominant force. That is simply not true.

                                        They won the game that counted and good on them but so did England in 2003. How did they go when they toured here in 2004 again?

                                        Dad’s Army had got even older…

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • nzzpN nzzp

                                          @rancid-schnitzel said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                          @nzzp said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                          @rancid-schnitzel said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                          Not saying that aren't a very good side but the way people have been fapping on about them you'd think they'd been this unstoppable dominant force. That is simply not true.

                                          I phrased my words poorly - I meant they got perceived as more of a behemoth by not playing.

                                          They were very good though. Saying we beat them easily in group play is a bit of a simplification - we had 5 minutes of magic (thanks Sevu), and that was enough to hold them off. They played really well in the Final in particular.

                                          But, they were a good side, and beating the Lions was a good effort. But again - they haven't played since 2019, so you can look better and better as the flaws in other game plans get exposed.

                                          Agreed. But point of order, I said comfortably not easily.

                                          their forwards did some damage to us, same as in 2015. They are strong up front - but we pick smaller, more athletic ball players who can go 80 and help break games open

                                          No QuarterN Offline
                                          No QuarterN Offline
                                          No Quarter
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #876

                                          @nzzp said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                          @rancid-schnitzel said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                          @nzzp said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                          @rancid-schnitzel said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

                                          Not saying that aren't a very good side but the way people have been fapping on about them you'd think they'd been this unstoppable dominant force. That is simply not true.

                                          I phrased my words poorly - I meant they got perceived as more of a behemoth by not playing.

                                          They were very good though. Saying we beat them easily in group play is a bit of a simplification - we had 5 minutes of magic (thanks Sevu), and that was enough to hold them off. They played really well in the Final in particular.

                                          But, they were a good side, and beating the Lions was a good effort. But again - they haven't played since 2019, so you can look better and better as the flaws in other game plans get exposed.

                                          Agreed. But point of order, I said comfortably not easily.

                                          their forwards did some damage to us, same as in 2015. They are strong up front - but we pick smaller, more athletic ball players who can go 80 and help break games open

                                          All good and well smacking us around up front but they only scored 13 points and I don't remember them looking particularly threatening. It was a comfortable win in the end, 13 points is never going to be enough in the modern game.

                                          I expect they will seriously challenge us when we play them though, they are not the kind of team that can be easily blown away. We'll need to be accurate as they feed off teams mistakes (penalties and knock ons) and apply pressure through set piece.

                                          NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                                          3
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search