Wallabies v Springboks II
-
@rebound said in Wallabies v Springboks II:
@damo plus a 3 week sit down minimum
No bind, straight to the head.
Even before the recent crackdown on head contact that was a red.
@damo said in Wallabies v Springboks II:
@rebound said in Wallabies v Springboks II:
@damo plus a 3 week sit down minimum
No bind, straight to the head.
Even before the recent crackdown on head contact that was a red.
Pretty much a Scott Barret special.
-
How that’s that the “shoulder change” and fafs slap down are considered the same things is madness
-
@nzzp said in Wallabies v Springboks II:
@kirwan said in Wallabies v Springboks II:
Red card? Shitty clean out.
Head to head
Not first contact.
As m4l likes to say - put your head there...
@antipodean said in Wallabies v Springboks II:
@nzzp said in Wallabies v Springboks II:
@kirwan said in Wallabies v Springboks II:
Red card? Shitty clean out.
Head to head
Not first contact.
As m4l likes to say - put your head there...
Yeah I actually think it wasn't that bad. Definitely a penalty. No more
I'm just wondering about how he saw that vs the earlier tackle
-
How the fuck isn’t that a red? The guy intentionally ran around and put his shoulder into the head.
-
Not sure what 21 was trying to achieve either. Straight off his feet to seal the ball too. Dumb.
@act-crusader said in Wallabies v Springboks II:
Not sure what 21 was trying to achieve either. Straight off his feet to seal the ball too. Dumb.
In sideways too. It was something a reserve grader would be embarrassed about
-
@damo said in Wallabies v Springboks II:
@rebound said in Wallabies v Springboks II:
@damo plus a 3 week sit down minimum
No bind, straight to the head.
Even before the recent crackdown on head contact that was a red.
Pretty much a Scott Barret special.
@kirwan said in Wallabies v Springboks II:
@damo said in Wallabies v Springboks II:
@rebound said in Wallabies v Springboks II:
@damo plus a 3 week sit down minimum
No bind, straight to the head.
Even before the recent crackdown on head contact that was a red.
Pretty much a Scott Barret special.
Scott should appeal
-
@chimoaus said in Wallabies v Springboks II:
Congrats Wallabies, not often you beat the world champs twice in a row.
Not often they win two in a row period.
-
I'll be surprised if this isn't going to be a citing. There's no way there are mitigating factors. First contact was with the head; with force.
@stargazer said in Wallabies v Springboks II:
I'll be surprised if this isn't going to be a citing. There's no way there are mitigating factors. First contact was with the head; with force.
Shoulder to the head of a player in a vulnerable position. Should be a long ban.
-
@chris said in Wallabies v Springboks II:
Shoulder on head Red card , soft Ref.
No attempt to clean out. If Swinton was a borderline red, that was an easy red
-
@chris said in Wallabies v Springboks II:
Shoulder on head Red card , soft Ref.
No attempt to clean out. If Swinton was a borderline red, that was an easy red
-
Well done Wallabies.
-
@chris said in Wallabies v Springboks II:
Shoulder on head Red card , soft Ref.
No attempt to clean out. If Swinton was a borderline red, that was an easy red
@nta said in Wallabies v Springboks II:
@chris said in Wallabies v Springboks II:
Shoulder on head Red card , soft Ref.
No attempt to clean out. If Swinton was a borderline red, that was an easy red
Totally agree
