• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Wallabies v Springboks II

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
australiaspringboks
633 Posts 58 Posters 33.8k Views
Wallabies v Springboks II
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #538

    @tim said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    Well done Aussie. Bonus point win over an unfit and incredibly dull SA.

    It’s progress, can’t control the quality of the opposition. And previous Aussie sides could have found a way to lose at least last week.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Rebound
    replied to kiwiinmelb on last edited by
    #539

    @kiwiinmelb my tipping was Aus by 8. I think I underestimated how shit the Boks are

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #540

    Messy fun game that highlighted a bit about both sides.

    Wallabies are going well, building some nice pieces.

    The Boks are pretty average. If you can hold the ball you can score a heap of points

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #541

    @kirwan Rennie is a good coach

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    wrote on last edited by
    #542

    SA have always been poor in Australia don't forget. But that really was one of the worst performances in a long time.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #543

    @kirwan said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    @stargazer said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    I'll be surprised if this isn't going to be a citing. There's no way there are mitigating factors. First contact was with the head; with force.

    Shoulder to the head of a player in a vulnerable position. Should be a long ban.

    Mid-range entry point: 6 weeks. If he has a clean record, admits guilt and apologises: 3 weeks. Standard punishment.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #544

    Kolisi speaks so well

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    wrote on last edited by
    #545

    Poor Argentina may go 0-6 this year.

    StargazerS M 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    wrote on last edited by
    #546

    So has Super Rugby Transtasman and 3 games vs us actually helped the Wallabies. Even though they lost they played at a high pace each week.

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #547

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    @chimoaus said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    Congrats Wallabies, not often you beat the world champs twice in a row.

    Not often they win two in a row period.

    First time for Rennie

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nevorian
    wrote on last edited by
    #548

    Can Aus Govt give SBW citizenship too sick of him embarrassing kiwi good name

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to chimoaus on last edited by
    #549

    @chimoaus said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    Poor Argentina may go 0-6 this year.

    They need the Jaguares back. Whatever competition they'd play in, it would be better than now, with most of their players playing in different teams in Europe, a few in Oz and some in the inferior SLAR comp.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to chimoaus on last edited by
    #550

    @chimoaus said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    Poor Argentina may go 0-6 this year.

    They've already lost twice to Wales b, 0-8

    chimoausC StargazerS 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #551

    @machpants said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    @chimoaus said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    Poor Argentina may go 0-6 this year.

    They've already lost twice to Wales b, 0-8

    Sad to see, much prefer a strong Argie side. I do wonder how the pandemic has impacted many of the players and teams.

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nevorian
    replied to chimoaus on last edited by
    #552

    @chimoaus said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    @machpants said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    @chimoaus said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    Poor Argentina may go 0-6 this year.

    They've already lost twice to Wales b, 0-8

    Sad to see, much prefer a strong Argie side. I do wonder how the pandemic has impacted many of the players and teams.

    Pumas to beat Wallabies 2-0 then

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #553

    @machpants said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    @chimoaus said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    Poor Argentina may go 0-6 this year.

    They've already lost twice to Wales b, 0-8

    Incorrect.
    Their first test, this year, against Wales was a 20 - 20 draw.
    They beat Wales in their second test: 33 - 11.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #554

    @stargazer said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    @machpants said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    @chimoaus said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    Poor Argentina may go 0-6 this year.

    They've already lost twice to Wales b, 0-8

    Incorrect.
    Their first test, this year, against Wales was a 20 - 20 draw.
    They beat Wales in their second test: 33 - 11.

    Ah, my error.

    Soz

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to chimoaus on last edited by
    #555

    @chimoaus said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    So has Super Rugby Transtasman and 3 games vs us actually helped the Wallabies. Even though they lost they played at a high pace each week.

    Does that mean we can claim credit for some of their victory? Ok, good!

    chimoausC nostrildamusN nzzpN 3 Replies Last reply
    1
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by
    #556

    @nostrildamus said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    @chimoaus said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    So has Super Rugby Transtasman and 3 games vs us actually helped the Wallabies. Even though they lost they played at a high pace each week.

    Does that mean we can claim credit for some of their victory? Ok, good!

    Plus a kiwi coach, and to think the brass at Oz Hq say we don't care about them.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by nostrildamus
    #557

    so do we need to beat the Boks next to gain #1?
    That would add a bit of incentive. Or at least, spice.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Wallabies v Springboks II
Rugby Matches
australiaspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.