• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Chiefs v Highlanders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
chiefshighlanders
287 Posts 35 Posters 7.8k Views
Chiefs v Highlanders
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cgrant
    wrote on last edited by
    #247

    Even if you don't count his try, PGS was the best player on the paddock. With this kind of performance, I could see him slot straight into the AB squad.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expat
    wrote on last edited by kiwi_expat
    #248

    Chiefs looked quite impressive, especially defensively and at the breakdown, they certainly have the squad in 2022 to go all the way & under McMillan I wouldn't be surprised if they did it.

    Predicting that it's going to be a three-way shootout between Chiefs, Blues, Saders for the inaugural SRP title, think they all have sufficient forward depth to weather some inevitable seasonal injuries.

    Highlanders to qualify for Semi's and go down valiantly to one of those 3.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    replied to kiwi_expat on last edited by
    #249

    @kiwi_expat I think Brumbies and Reds will push for top 4 at play-offs with Crusaders, Blues and Chiefs. It is a big ask for 4 NZ teams to make semis.

    kiwi_expatK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expat
    replied to ARHS on last edited by kiwi_expat
    #250

    @arhs said in Chiefs v Highlanders:

    It is a big ask for 4 NZ teams to make semis.

    Not really, as it occurred in the final four seasons of proper Super Rugby (2016, 2017, 2018, 2019).

    gt12G KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to kiwi_expat on last edited by gt12
    #251

    @kiwi_expat said in Chiefs v Highlanders:

    @arhs said in Chiefs v Highlanders:

    It is a big ask for 4 NZ teams to make semis.

    Not really, as it occurred in the final four seasons of proper Super Rugby (2016, 2017, 2018, 2019).

    The 12 participating teams will not be divided into geographical conferences, instead playing 14 regular season games: the 12 teams facing each other once in a home-and-away format for 11 games, and the remaining 3 games to be played with an emphasis on derby matches.
    
    The top eight teams at the conclusion of the regular season qualify for the play-offs. For the quarterfinals, the first-ranked team play the eighth-ranked team, the second-ranked team play the seventh-ranked, the third-ranked play the sixth-ranked and the fourth-ranked team play the fifth-ranked. The Quarterfinal winners will progress to the Semifinal, and the winners of the semifinals will advance to the final. The higher ranked team will host each playoff match
    

    I'll be surprised to see it happen.

    It will really depend on who makes the top eight in which order, as we could easily have all 6 (5) kiwi sides make it but still have an OZ semi finalist due to different match ups.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #252

    @gt12 with the Drua playing you might get 3 aussie teams in places 3 to 6 and an all aussie semi regardless of needing 4 nz teams to beat every aussie team they play.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to kiwi_expat on last edited by
    #253

    @kiwi_expat said in Chiefs v Highlanders:

    @arhs said in Chiefs v Highlanders:

    It is a big ask for 4 NZ teams to make semis.

    Not really, as it occurred in the final four seasons of proper Super Rugby (2016, 2017, 2018, 2019).

    Those were quarter finals not semi finals

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #254

    From the Chiefs Insta page.

    Pita Gus in training last week

    274256449_10159987819167210_2821534171663477133_n.jpg

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #255

    The more I think about that try the more I think it was a planned option from the Chiefs.

    Chiefs first try they had a wider blind and they put two players there. Aaron Smith stays on that side but PGS traps the ball until told to use it and breaks with an 8/9 to the open. Smith is stuck on the wrong side of the scrum and can't get around to help the defence.

    Second try Chiefs initially put the winger behind the scrum with body turned toward the first open channel. Landers winger moves over to add to the line there and if you watch Smith he looks at their set up about three times . Chiefs backs act ready to run a move and he gets sucked into running to the back of the scrum. PGS picks and runs immediately while the scrum is still pushing hard. He is already well on the move before any break is called. Having the 9 run back is an indication to the blindside flanker that his side isn't in danger as well.
    Smith does actually realise quickly (he changes direction back as soon as he is behind his 8 but the open door plus the pressure from the Chiefs scrum on their loosehead side has also meant that Frizzel is compromised.
    I actually wonder if anyone called that PGS had lifted the ball because the whole Landers scrum keeps scrummaging.

    Up to that point the Chiefs had worked 8/9s to the open as their standard. The change up worked.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    wrote on last edited by Kiwiwomble
    #256

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/127867946/chiefs-no-8-pita-gus-sowakulas-hurdle-try-was-illegal-refs-tell-highlanders?fbclid=IwAR0HFo0rc5HHehfIqwgVpJWsy84T9XuumvQRu_0hC63xW9jpRZu4dufkPYA

    seriously? they jump to catch the ball...is that going to be considered illegal? maybe smith should have been carded for trying to tackle someone off the ground...thats the same thing isn't it?

    “We got an email from the referees saying that’s now illegal,” Highlanders head coach Tony Brown said on Wednesday.
    
    “Dangerous play I think is the ruling. Even though it’s not a law it’s being deemed as dangerous now.”
    

    at least browny is taking it the right way

    Brown, however, was not bitter that referee Paul Williams did not penalise Sowakula, instead light-heartedly pinning the blame on his captain Smith.
    
    “I’m more disappointed with Aaron Smith really,” he said. “I’m not disappointed with what happened at the weekend, I just want to make sure Aaron does his job.”
    
    B 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • B Do not disturb
    B Do not disturb
    bayimports
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #257

    @kiwiwomble said in Chiefs v Highlanders:

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/127867946/chiefs-no-8-pita-gus-sowakulas-hurdle-try-was-illegal-refs-tell-highlanders?fbclid=IwAR0HFo0rc5HHehfIqwgVpJWsy84T9XuumvQRu_0hC63xW9jpRZu4dufkPYA

    seriously? they jump to catch the ball...is that going to be considered illegal? maybe smith should have been carded for trying to tackle someone off the ground...thats the same thing isn't it?

    “We got an email from the referees saying that’s now illegal,” Highlanders head coach Tony Brown said on Wednesday.
    
    “Dangerous play I think is the ruling. Even though it’s not a law it’s being deemed as dangerous now.”
    

    wow, I would down vote this if I could, I agree with you I dont like that interpretation at all

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #258

    Sinckler jumped into a tackle catching a bad pass and received a penalty for his troubles. That decided a Lions Test.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #259

    Next it will be illegal to side-step an opponent or jump to avoid being ankle-tapped. 🙄

    BonesB CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #260

    @bovidae said in Chiefs v Highlanders:

    Next it will be illegal to side-step an opponent or jump to avoid being ankle-tapped. 🙄

    Unless you're a crusader.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #261

    @bones said in Chiefs v Highlanders:

    @bovidae said in Chiefs v Highlanders:

    Next it will be illegal to side-step an opponent or jump to avoid being ankle-tapped. 🙄

    Unless you're a crusader.

    The way it should be of course.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by Hooroo
    #262

    Ok so now it's illegal to avoid contact? You must make contact to a low flying tackler???

    Rugby must have a massive fucking cock as they are excellent at fucking themselves!!

    mariner4lifeM KiwiwombleK 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #263

    @hooroo said in Chiefs v Highlanders:

    Rugby must have a massive fucking cock

    nah just some of us (former) players

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #264

    @hooroo said in Chiefs v Highlanders:

    Ok so now it's illegal to avoid contact? You must make contact to a low flying tackler???

    Rugby must have a massive fucking cock as they are excellent at fucking themselves!!

    yeah, the way i read it, i cant help think if he'd stayed on the ground and smith had fired himself headfirst into his knee...no problem

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #265

    @bovidae said in Chiefs v Highlanders:

    Next it will be illegal to side-step an opponent or jump to avoid being ankle-tapped. 🙄

    It’s a bizarre ruling. Dangerous play is the same law for head high tackles. If a player sticks their arm out high but the ball carrier dodges the impact it’s just play on. The act is dangerous but nothing happened. Same as this.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    wrote on last edited by
    #266

    how is this dangerous play but jumping over a group of other players to try and take the ball is fine, more than fine that player is protected under the rules

    at least PGS was in possession and so had actual control of the game, someone jumping for a catch is still speculative

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Chiefs v Highlanders
Rugby Matches
chiefshighlanders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.