Crusaders v Hurricanes
-
Take Ardie and Jordie out of this team and they'll struggle (Fatty doesn't play this well every week).
The problem with nailing on Jordie as 12 for the ABs after this match is that he seemed to be floating all over the field, which is not what the ABs need.
-
Take Ardie and Jordie out of this team and they'll struggle (Fatty doesn't play this well every week).
The problem with nailing on Jordie as 12 for the ABs after this match is that he seemed to be floating all over the field, which is not what the ABs need.
@nepia Yes but he wants to be involved. Without he play the cane would have been swamped. In a AB enviroment, at least with a different coach, he would not have to wear as many hats could play his position. Even Ardie could play a more robust 2nd five than Havilli.
-
@tim said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:
Still got the W though.
It will be interesting to see who gets the home semifinals.
Yeah we did if we get our game together we will be hard to beat.
Crusaders ,Blues/Chiefs I think.
I can’t see the Brumbies or Reds winning enough games against the Nz teams to stay in the top 2. -
@chris really if you had a smarter team playing you would have lost. The Crusader mistique of old is lost.
@broughie said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:
@chris really if you had a smarter team playing you would have lost. The Crusader mistique of old is lost.
Maybe but winning ugly still keeps you on top.
A long way to the Finals yet. -
@antipodean said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:
Those that came out of this fixture with their reputations tarnished:
- Kirifi
- Scrafton
- Bridge.
- Pickerill.
So Bridge played well then?
@crazy-horse said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:
@antipodean said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:
Those that came out of this fixture with their reputations tarnished:
- Kirifi
- Scrafton
- Bridge.
- Pickerill.
So Bridge played well then?
So Bridge still have some reputation to tarnish?
-
@mikey07 said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:
Imagine having an All Black Backline and only winning by 3!
I be am sure Foster would have taken it against Ireland or France.
-
@broughie said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:
@chris really if you had a smarter team playing you would have lost. The Crusader mistique of old is lost.
Maybe but winning ugly still keeps you on top.
A long way to the Finals yet. -
@broughie said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:
@chris really if you had a smarter team playing you would have lost. The Crusader mistique of old is lost.
Maybe but winning ugly still keeps you on top.
A long way to the Finals yet.@chris said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:
@broughie said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:
@chris really if you had a smarter team playing you would have lost. The Crusader mistique of old is lost.
Maybe but winning ugly still keeps you on top.
A long way to the Finals yet.I really can't see the crusaders getting the same "luck" under non kiwi refs...
-
@chris said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:
@broughie said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:
@chris really if you had a smarter team playing you would have lost. The Crusader mistique of old is lost.
Maybe but winning ugly still keeps you on top.
A long way to the Finals yet.I really can't see the crusaders getting the same "luck" under non kiwi refs...
@bones said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:
@chris said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:
@broughie said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:
@chris really if you had a smarter team playing you would have lost. The Crusader mistique of old is lost.
Maybe but winning ugly still keeps you on top.
A long way to the Finals yet.I really can't see the crusaders getting the same "luck" under non kiwi refs...
Well if it’s Murphy no NZ team will win he is worse than pick his nuts.
-
@broughie said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:
@chris but that Foster and he is average.
You are being to kind he is fucking useless.
