Crusaders v Blues
-
Not a lot of downside for me in this game. The big win was Saturday against the Chiefs. Now there is daylight between the Crusaders/Blues and the rest of the NZ sides.
The only thing in this comp is to get to the final. Ideally hosting it, but get to teh final must be the drive. After that, it's on. So a win would be nice, but more important is winning all the Australian games and building into the finals series.
Blues massive underdogs with all the injuries
@nzzp said in Crusaders v Blues:
Not a lot of downside for me in this game. The big win was Saturday against the Chiefs. Now there is daylight between the Crusaders/Blues and the rest of the NZ sides.
The only thing in this comp is to get to the final. Ideally hosting it, but get to teh final must be the drive. After that, it's on. So a win would be nice, but more important is winning all the Australian games and building into the finals series.
Blues massive underdogs with all the injuries
Not sure about underdogs.Nice try though.
We have 3 locks now out,2 hookers from the original squad out.
Still won't have Goodhue yet.
Matera and Jager injured not sure if they are back this week though.Scamble on for underdog status.
-
@nzzp said in Crusaders v Blues:
Not a lot of downside for me in this game. The big win was Saturday against the Chiefs. Now there is daylight between the Crusaders/Blues and the rest of the NZ sides.
The only thing in this comp is to get to the final. Ideally hosting it, but get to teh final must be the drive. After that, it's on. So a win would be nice, but more important is winning all the Australian games and building into the finals series.
Blues massive underdogs with all the injuries
Not sure about underdogs.Nice try though.
We have 3 locks now out,2 hookers from the original squad out.
Still won't have Goodhue yet.
Matera and Jager injured not sure if they are back this week though.Scamble on for underdog status.
@chris said in Crusaders v Blues:
Not sure about underdogs.Nice try though.
Blues haven't won in Christchurch since 2004. Haven't beaten Crusaders at all since 2014.
-
@chris said in Crusaders v Blues:
Not sure about underdogs.Nice try though.
Blues haven't won in Christchurch since 2004. Haven't beaten Crusaders at all since 2014.
@kiwimurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
@chris said in Crusaders v Blues:
Not sure about underdogs.Nice try though.
Blues haven't won in Christchurch since 2004. Haven't beaten Crusaders at all since 2014.
Oh really I didn't know that.
Ireland had never beaten the AB's until recently,they have now twice. -
@kiwimurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
@chris said in Crusaders v Blues:
Not sure about underdogs.Nice try though.
Blues haven't won in Christchurch since 2004. Haven't beaten Crusaders at all since 2014.
Oh really I didn't know that.
Ireland had never beaten the AB's until recently,they have now twice.@chris said in Crusaders v Blues:
@kiwimurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
@chris said in Crusaders v Blues:
Not sure about underdogs.Nice try though.
Blues haven't won in Christchurch since 2004. Haven't beaten Crusaders at all since 2014.
Oh really I didn't know that.
Ireland had never beaten the AB's until recently,they have now twice.True. But going into Chicago Ireland would have been underdogs :winking_face:
-
@chris said in Crusaders v Blues:
@kiwimurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
@chris said in Crusaders v Blues:
Not sure about underdogs.Nice try though.
Blues haven't won in Christchurch since 2004. Haven't beaten Crusaders at all since 2014.
Oh really I didn't know that.
Ireland had never beaten the AB's until recently,they have now twice.True. But going into Chicago Ireland would have been underdogs :winking_face:
@kiwimurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
@chris said in Crusaders v Blues:
@kiwimurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
@chris said in Crusaders v Blues:
Not sure about underdogs.Nice try though.
Blues haven't won in Christchurch since 2004. Haven't beaten Crusaders at all since 2014.
Oh really I didn't know that.
Ireland had never beaten the AB's until recently,they have now twice.True. But going into Chicago Ireland would have been underdogs :winking_face:
we took them so easily we played Kaino at lock. Seemed a reasonable assumption at the time
Back to back to back champions Crusaders trying to claim underdog status ... quality effort lads
-
@chris said in Crusaders v Blues:
@kiwimurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
@chris said in Crusaders v Blues:
Not sure about underdogs.Nice try though.
Blues haven't won in Christchurch since 2004. Haven't beaten Crusaders at all since 2014.
Oh really I didn't know that.
Ireland had never beaten the AB's until recently,they have now twice.True. But going into Chicago Ireland would have been underdogs :winking_face:
@kiwimurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
@chris said in Crusaders v Blues:
@kiwimurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
@chris said in Crusaders v Blues:
Not sure about underdogs.Nice try though.
Blues haven't won in Christchurch since 2004. Haven't beaten Crusaders at all since 2014.
Oh really I didn't know that.
Ireland had never beaten the AB's until recently,they have now twice.True. But going into Chicago Ireland would have been underdogs :winking_face:
But you now have a 100 + Plus Game Crusaders coaching you,Cantabs like Romano and Darry in the team you must be favourites.
-
@kiwimurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
@chris said in Crusaders v Blues:
@kiwimurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
@chris said in Crusaders v Blues:
Not sure about underdogs.Nice try though.
Blues haven't won in Christchurch since 2004. Haven't beaten Crusaders at all since 2014.
Oh really I didn't know that.
Ireland had never beaten the AB's until recently,they have now twice.True. But going into Chicago Ireland would have been underdogs :winking_face:
we took them so easily we played Kaino at lock. Seemed a reasonable assumption at the time
Back to back to back champions Crusaders trying to claim underdog status ... quality effort lads
@nzzp said in Crusaders v Blues:
@kiwimurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
@chris said in Crusaders v Blues:
@kiwimurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
@chris said in Crusaders v Blues:
Not sure about underdogs.Nice try though.
Blues haven't won in Christchurch since 2004. Haven't beaten Crusaders at all since 2014.
Oh really I didn't know that.
Ireland had never beaten the AB's until recently,they have now twice.True. But going into Chicago Ireland would have been underdogs :winking_face:
we took them so easily we played Kaino at lock. Seemed a reasonable assumption at the time
Back to back to back champions Crusaders trying to claim underdog status ... quality effort lads
Hang on didn't you win the last title :face_with_raised_eyebrow:
-
@kiwimurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
@chris said in Crusaders v Blues:
@kiwimurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
@chris said in Crusaders v Blues:
Not sure about underdogs.Nice try though.
Blues haven't won in Christchurch since 2004. Haven't beaten Crusaders at all since 2014.
Oh really I didn't know that.
Ireland had never beaten the AB's until recently,they have now twice.True. But going into Chicago Ireland would have been underdogs :winking_face:
But you now have a 100 + Plus Game Crusaders coaching you,Cantabs like Romano and Darry in the team you must be favourites.
-
Be ironic if Simon Hickey is involved in this game - he was at 10 the last time Blues beat Crusaders.
@kiwimurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
Be ironic if Simon Hickey is involved in this game - he was at 10 the last time Blues beat Crusaders.
Sam Whitelock the only player from that match that's still with the same squad
Nepo & Romano have moved to the Blues
Hickey & Hall moved to the Crusaders
-
Not a lot of downside for me in this game. The big win was Saturday against the Chiefs. Now there is daylight between the Crusaders/Blues and the rest of the NZ sides.
The only thing in this comp is to get to the final. Ideally hosting it, but get to teh final must be the drive. After that, it's on. So a win would be nice, but more important is winning all the Australian games and building into the finals series.
Blues massive underdogs with all the injuries
@nzzp said in Crusaders v Blues:
Not a lot of downside for me in this game. The big win was Saturday against the Chiefs. Now there is daylight between the Crusaders/Blues and the rest of the NZ sides.
The only thing in this comp is to get to the final. Ideally hosting it, but get to teh final must be the drive. After that, it's on. So a win would be nice, but more important is winning all the Australian games and building into the finals series.
Blues massive underdogs with all the injuries
Crusaders are also without Matera, Goodhue, Whitelock, Strange, Dunshea, McAlister & Klein.
-
@nzzp said in Crusaders v Blues:
Not a lot of downside for me in this game. The big win was Saturday against the Chiefs. Now there is daylight between the Crusaders/Blues and the rest of the NZ sides.
The only thing in this comp is to get to the final. Ideally hosting it, but get to teh final must be the drive. After that, it's on. So a win would be nice, but more important is winning all the Australian games and building into the finals series.
Blues massive underdogs with all the injuries
Crusaders are also without Matera, Goodhue, Whitelock, Strange, Dunshea, McAlister & Klein.
@kiwi_expat said in Crusaders v Blues:
@nzzp said in Crusaders v Blues:
Not a lot of downside for me in this game. The big win was Saturday against the Chiefs. Now there is daylight between the Crusaders/Blues and the rest of the NZ sides.
The only thing in this comp is to get to the final. Ideally hosting it, but get to teh final must be the drive. After that, it's on. So a win would be nice, but more important is winning all the Australian games and building into the finals series.
Blues massive underdogs with all the injuries
Crusaders are also without Matera, Goodhue, Whitelock, Strange, Dunshea, McAlister & Klein.
good luck! We're completely underdone; haven't had a preseason, didn't play NPC last year, and so ravaged with injuries it's amazing we can fill the coaches box, let alone field a 23.
Tongue slightly in cheek, though, it'll be a crackign top of the table clash. Can't wait.
Last year after the Crusaders got up, they drew with the Canes and then dropped the game after that. Peaked, but it took its toll I reckon.
-
@kiwi_expat said in Crusaders v Blues:
@nzzp said in Crusaders v Blues:
Not a lot of downside for me in this game. The big win was Saturday against the Chiefs. Now there is daylight between the Crusaders/Blues and the rest of the NZ sides.
The only thing in this comp is to get to the final. Ideally hosting it, but get to teh final must be the drive. After that, it's on. So a win would be nice, but more important is winning all the Australian games and building into the finals series.
Blues massive underdogs with all the injuries
Crusaders are also without Matera, Goodhue, Whitelock, Strange, Dunshea, McAlister & Klein.
good luck! We're completely underdone; haven't had a preseason, didn't play NPC last year, and so ravaged with injuries it's amazing we can fill the coaches box, let alone field a 23.
Tongue slightly in cheek, though, it'll be a crackign top of the table clash. Can't wait.
Last year after the Crusaders got up, they drew with the Canes and then dropped the game after that. Peaked, but it took its toll I reckon.
@nzzp said in Crusaders v Blues:
@kiwi_expat said in Crusaders v Blues:
@nzzp said in Crusaders v Blues:
Not a lot of downside for me in this game. The big win was Saturday against the Chiefs. Now there is daylight between the Crusaders/Blues and the rest of the NZ sides.
The only thing in this comp is to get to the final. Ideally hosting it, but get to teh final must be the drive. After that, it's on. So a win would be nice, but more important is winning all the Australian games and building into the finals series.
Blues massive underdogs with all the injuries
Crusaders are also without Matera, Goodhue, Whitelock, Strange, Dunshea, McAlister & Klein.
good luck! We're completely underdone; haven't had a preseason, didn't play NPC last year, and so ravaged with injuries it's amazing we can fill the coaches box, let alone field a 23.
Tongue slightly in cheek, though, it'll be a crackign top of the table clash. Can't wait.
Last year after the Crusaders got up, they drew with the Canes and then dropped the game after that. Peaked, but it took its toll I reckon.
And haven't won in Christchurch since the 20th century. Crusaders to lose
-
Largely unchanged team to be expected, aside from halfbacks.
Might see Lam start, with Tu'inukuafe on the bench?
@tim said in Crusaders v Blues:
Largely unchanged team to be expected, aside from halfbacks.
Might see Lam start, with Tu'inukuafe on the bench?
@Nogusta was hinting that Evans would be involved. Would be a massive call to start him so I assume he'll be on the bench
-
@tim said in Crusaders v Blues:
Largely unchanged team to be expected, aside from halfbacks.
Might see Lam start, with Tu'inukuafe on the bench?
@Nogusta was hinting that Evans would be involved. Would be a massive call to start him so I assume he'll be on the bench
@duluth said in Crusaders v Blues:
@tim said in Crusaders v Blues:
Largely unchanged team to be expected, aside from halfbacks.
Might see Lam start, with Tu'inukuafe on the bench?
@Nogusta was hinting that Evans would be involved. Would be a massive call to start him so I assume he'll be on the bench
I wonder if that means they hold RTS for one more week as it would be a big call to start RTS in this game.
