Crusaders v Blues
-
That is why I love this game! Bloody brilliant1 Loved it as a neutral I was still on edge of my seat.
-
Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.
Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...
@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:
Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.
Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...
Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.
-
Those talking up Perofeta for the ABs were premature. He showed a lack of big game temperament in this game.
Papali'i - the best player on the field.
I'm going to praise Fraser as well, who didn't get fooled by either team trying to milk penalties.
No idea how the commentary was I didn't listen to it!
-
Blues loosies got through plenty of tackles
Robinson 10 (2 misses)
Papali'i 21 (0 misses)
Sotutu 15 (0 misses)Worth mentioning Ioanes defensive game too: 16 tackles, 2 misses. That's an usually high number of tackles for a centre
@duluth amazing Stats ..special to Luke Romano as well , to play 80 minutes when he got bugger all minutes last year is incredible
-
-
@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:
Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.
Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...
Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.
@pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:
@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:
Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.
Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...
Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.
Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.
-
Magnificent result for this team, great game to watch.
Our looses completely dominated theirs. First half BB was excellent, second half kicked a bit too much and not well. But outplayed RM fairly comprehensively.
FC must be the form halfback in the country too.
Dalton was immense for us tonight. Tackles like a demon, carried well, calm.
As for the red card, SB is a grub. He had plenty of time to pull out of that, cowardly and could make an argument that he did that on purpose. Better get more than three weeks.
Imagine that sort of brain dead thuggery in a World Cup. Puke.
-
@pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:
@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:
Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.
Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...
Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.
Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.
@tj said in Crusaders v Blues:
@pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:
@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:
Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.
Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...
Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.
Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.
Yeah, he wilted a bit under the pressure. Good experience for him to improve from.
I prefer Sullivan at 15, but Perofeta has been good for us at ten.
-
Magnificent result for this team, great game to watch.
Our looses completely dominated theirs. First half BB was excellent, second half kicked a bit too much and not well. But outplayed RM fairly comprehensively.
FC must be the form halfback in the country too.
Dalton was immense for us tonight. Tackles like a demon, carried well, calm.
As for the red card, SB is a grub. He had plenty of time to pull out of that, cowardly and could make an argument that he did that on purpose. Better get more than three weeks.
Imagine that sort of brain dead thuggery in a World Cup. Puke.
-
@dan54 great for the comp ,and just the game it needed , can’t wait to see the sky ratings
@steven-harris said in Crusaders v Blues:
@dan54 great for the comp ,and just the game it needed , can’t wait to see the sky ratings
Where the hell do you ever find Sky ratings!
-
@tj said in Crusaders v Blues:
@pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:
@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:
Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.
Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...
Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.
Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.
Yeah, he wilted a bit under the pressure. Good experience for him to improve from.
I prefer Sullivan at 15, but Perofeta has been good for us at ten.
@kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:
@tj said in Crusaders v Blues:
@pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:
@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:
Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.
Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...
Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.
Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.
Yeah, he wilted a bit under the pressure. Good experience for him to improve from.
I prefer Sullivan at 15, but Perofeta has been good for us at ten.
Absolutely, think he is a good player and will learn from it, but definitely the right call to take him off in this game
-
@tim said in Crusaders v Blues:
Hats off to Goodhue as well. Outplayed some All Blacks this year.
Absolutely. I’ve been critical of him in the past.. particularly his lack of physicality. Not this year.
He’s responded really well to being a senior lock
-
@pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:
@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:
Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.
Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...
Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.
Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.
@tj said in Crusaders v Blues:
@pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:
@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:
Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.
Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...
Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.
Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.
No you're right, Barrett closed it out perfectly.
-
@pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:
@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:
Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.
Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...
Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.
Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.
@tj said in Crusaders v Blues:
@pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:
@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:
Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.
Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...
Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.
Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.
He was at fullback, and may have been overplaying at times. But at that point BB was kicking very poorly, and Perofeta is more calculating.
-
@tj said in Crusaders v Blues:
@pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:
@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:
Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.
Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...
Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.
Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.
No you're right, Barrett closed it out perfectly.
@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:
@tj said in Crusaders v Blues:
@pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:
@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:
Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.
Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...
Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.
Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.
No you're right, Barrett closed it out perfectly.
So your solution is move the player missing easy kicks at goal and falling over chasing kicks to run the ship?
BB was instrumental in us winning that game.
