QF Blues v Highlanders
-
Why is he smiling?
-
Exactly what RCs are for.
Dumb and dangerous -
Why is he smiling?
@antipodean said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
Why is he smiling?
Reaction like that should count against them come judiciary...
-
@antipodean said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
Why is he smiling?
Reaction like that should count against them come judiciary...
@Mattasaurus could just be bemused...
-
@antipodean said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
TMO - that's clearly grounded.
No it's not, you can't see it touch. Not conclusive, so correct call by procedure. Just the ref on wrong side. Totally is a try, but you can't see it touch the ground, that's the rules
Anyway that's a red
@Machpants said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
@antipodean said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
TMO - that's clearly grounded.
No it's not, you can't see it touch. Not conclusive, so correct call by procedure. Just the ref on wrong side. Totally is a try, but you can't see it touch the ground, that's the rules
You can conclusively see that nothing can be between the ball and the ground. Or not if you're so shit a ref you get sacked back to first grade.
-
It's really sad, but being injury prone, is probably a reason why TUJ may not become an AB.
@Stargazer said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
It's really sad, but being injury prone, is probably a reason why TUJ may not become an AB.
Kiwi Manu Tuilagi
-
@Mattasaurus could just be bemused...
@taniwharugby said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
@Mattasaurus could just be bemused...
I hope so...otherwise its pretty nasty
-
@Machpants said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
@antipodean said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
TMO - that's clearly grounded.
No it's not, you can't see it touch. Not conclusive, so correct call by procedure. Just the ref on wrong side. Totally is a try, but you can't see it touch the ground, that's the rules
You can conclusively see that nothing can be between the ball and the ground. Or not if you're so shit a ref you get sacked back to first grade.
@antipodean said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
@Machpants said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
@antipodean said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
TMO - that's clearly grounded.
No it's not, you can't see it touch. Not conclusive, so correct call by procedure. Just the ref on wrong side. Totally is a try, but you can't see it touch the ground, that's the rules
You can conclusively see that nothing can be between the ball and the ground. Or not if you're so shit a ref you get sacked back to first grade.
Nope not how it works, they have to see it touch to overturn a no try call by the ref. You can say the rules are wrong but that was the procedure followed correctly, all cos ref was on wrong side.
Man blues are playing like donkeys
-
@antipodean said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
Why is he smiling?
Reaction like that should count against them come judiciary...
@Mattasaurus said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
@antipodean said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
Why is he smiling?
Reaction like that should count against them come judiciary...
So we dictate how people react to certain situations? No thanks.
-
@Machpants said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
@antipodean said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
TMO - that's clearly grounded.
No it's not, you can't see it touch. Not conclusive, so correct call by procedure. Just the ref on wrong side. Totally is a try, but you can't see it touch the ground, that's the rules
You can conclusively see that nothing can be between the ball and the ground. Or not if you're so shit a ref you get sacked back to first grade.
@antipodean said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
@Machpants said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
@antipodean said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
TMO - that's clearly grounded.
No it's not, you can't see it touch. Not conclusive, so correct call by procedure. Just the ref on wrong side. Totally is a try, but you can't see it touch the ground, that's the rules
You can conclusively see that nothing can be between the ball and the ground. Or not if you're so shit a ref you get sacked back to first grade.
Is Leckie not allowed to say “Cobber, it’s clearly grounded, you should overrule your on field decision”?
-
It's almost like you need a playmaker and/or Captain to grip this shit and get on with it....
@Machpants said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
It's almost like you need a playmaker and/or Captain to grip this shit and get on with it....
BB isn't doing it. Most influential guy out there is Fakatava
-
It's really sad, but being injury prone, is probably a reason why TUJ may not become an AB.
@Stargazer said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
It's really sad, but being injury prone, is probably a reason why TUJ may not become an AB.
Conrad Smith was injury prone a lot early in his career. To try add some optimism to the discussion.
-
@antipodean said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
@Machpants said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
@antipodean said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
TMO - that's clearly grounded.
No it's not, you can't see it touch. Not conclusive, so correct call by procedure. Just the ref on wrong side. Totally is a try, but you can't see it touch the ground, that's the rules
You can conclusively see that nothing can be between the ball and the ground. Or not if you're so shit a ref you get sacked back to first grade.
Nope not how it works, they have to see it touch to overturn a no try call by the ref. You can say the rules are wrong but that was the procedure followed correctly, all cos ref was on wrong side.
Man blues are playing like donkeys
@Machpants said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
@antipodean said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
@Machpants said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
@antipodean said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
TMO - that's clearly grounded.
No it's not, you can't see it touch. Not conclusive, so correct call by procedure. Just the ref on wrong side. Totally is a try, but you can't see it touch the ground, that's the rules
You can conclusively see that nothing can be between the ball and the ground. Or not if you're so shit a ref you get sacked back to first grade.
Nope not how it works, they have to see it touch to overturn a no try call by the ref.
That's not what the protocol was when I did my level 2.
-
@antipodean said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
@Machpants said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
@antipodean said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
TMO - that's clearly grounded.
No it's not, you can't see it touch. Not conclusive, so correct call by procedure. Just the ref on wrong side. Totally is a try, but you can't see it touch the ground, that's the rules
You can conclusively see that nothing can be between the ball and the ground. Or not if you're so shit a ref you get sacked back to first grade.
Is Leckie not allowed to say “Cobber, it’s clearly grounded, you should overrule your on field decision”?
@Nepia said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
@antipodean said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
@Machpants said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
@antipodean said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
TMO - that's clearly grounded.
No it's not, you can't see it touch. Not conclusive, so correct call by procedure. Just the ref on wrong side. Totally is a try, but you can't see it touch the ground, that's the rules
You can conclusively see that nothing can be between the ball and the ground. Or not if you're so shit a ref you get sacked back to first grade.
Is Leckie not allowed to say “Cobber, it’s clearly grounded, you should overrule your on field decision”?
Only if he sees it touch the grass. He didn't. The law may overturn logic, but logic must not overturn the law
-
@Stargazer said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
It's really sad, but being injury prone, is probably a reason why TUJ may not become an AB.
Conrad Smith was injury prone a lot early in his career. To try add some optimism to the discussion.
@Nepia said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
@Stargazer said in QF Blues v Highlanders:
It's really sad, but being injury prone, is probably a reason why TUJ may not become an AB.
Conrad Smith was injury prone a lot early in his career. To try add some optimism to the discussion.
Since when has optimism been a prerequisite around here? I am fucked if that is the case!
