Blues v Brumbies
-
The Brumbies whole game revolves around milking the inconsistent reffing of mauls.
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="No Quarter" data-cid="595031" data-time="1467965592">
<div>
<p>A dodgy illegal feed is more reliable then Sky Go.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>and a better picture via Chrome Cast too</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="595039" data-time="1467965868"><p>and a better picture via Chrome Cast too</p></blockquote>
<br>
Sky go is really does show you what sky thinks of their customers.... -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="No Quarter" data-cid="595038" data-time="1467965789"><p>The Brumbies whole game revolves around milking the inconsistent reffing of mauls.</p></blockquote><br>Yeah. I am getting a bit frustrated by how effective it is. Their entire strategy is so one dimensional that you couldn't script it. If you had never seen the Brumbies play before<br>and I tried to describe them, you would think I am having you on.<br><br>Strange strategy yet it works.
-
<p>28-15 at the break...Brumbies playing a pretty negative style and it is keeping them in touch</p>
-
<p>re-watching the replay of Kaino's YC...not sure he coulda done much else there, he looked to have gotten too upright and then fell and got steam rolled.</p>
-
Mauls: the shittest part of rugby. <br>
Seems thats the only thing the Brumbies do at training. That and having their 6 join the front row to help out during scrums. <br>
Hopefully Francis comes back on, he has been good. <br>
Luatua back in AB form for me. -
Scott and Jeff yelling?
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="kev" data-cid="595046" data-time="1467966465">
<div>
<p>The Blues should continue not to engage lineout mauls and send in one tackler.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>They did, they were about to get penalised for it but got penalised for the shoulder instead.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Nepia" data-cid="595051" data-time="1467966624">
<div>
<p>They did, they were about to get penalised for it but got penalised for the shoulder instead.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>I didn't understand what that penalty at the "maul" was for, did you?</p> -
<p>yeah not sure why they engaged that, as it was the fact they were late meant the Brumbies had put players in front of the ball off side anyway!</p>
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="kev" data-cid="595046" data-time="1467966465"><p>The Blues should continue not to engage lineout mauls and send in one tackler.</p></blockquote><br>Agreed, the second half is going to make up my mind about Tana as a coach. He needs to think of a solution, that is his job. IF he can counter this then that is a feather in his cap.
-
Blues starting to show they have a pattern to how they want to play<br><br><br>
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
<p>The irony is the ref is an eye doctor.</p>
