Chiefs v Crusaders
-
Dodgy TMO!
-
How does a professional referee with his experience constantly get in the way? His positioning is terrible.
-
@KiwiMurph said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
Settle down the whinge. A 50/50 went Chiefs way.
Was it fifty fifty though? It looked to clearly drift forward to me.
-
@KiwiMurph said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
Settle down the whinge. A 50/50 went Chiefs way.
Was it fifty fifty though? It looked to clearly drift forward to me.
@Bones said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@KiwiMurph said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
Settle down the whinge. A 50/50 went Chiefs way.
Was it fifty fifty though? It looked to clearly drift forward to me.
But you have to go back to kicking it into your own player…
-
DMac thinks he has to come up with a miracle play every time he gets the ball.
Settle down son.@Frank said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
DMac thinks he has to come up with a miracle play every time he gets the ball.
Settle down son.Interested to see if or how he adapts.
If he does, it'll show real progress.
-
On replay it went forward from his hands, slightly. Not enough to overrule the initial play on call and for mine, certainly not egregious enough to rule out the try already awarded.
@antipodean said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
On replay it went forward from his hands, slightly. Not enough to overrule the initial play on call and for mine, certainly not egregious enough to rule out the try already awarded.
I don't get it. It went forward but it should be ignored because great try?
-
Grace making a nuisance of himself
-
@antipodean said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
On replay it went forward from his hands, slightly. Not enough to overrule the initial play on call and for mine, certainly not egregious enough to rule out the try already awarded.
I don't get it. It went forward but it should be ignored because great try?
@Bones said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@antipodean said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
On replay it went forward from his hands, slightly. Not enough to overrule the initial play on call and for mine, certainly not egregious enough to rule out the try already awarded.
I don't get it. It went forward but it should be ignored because great try?
Regardless, any competent official has to go back to the initial infringement........
-
Narawa is starting to shape as a real contender.
-
@antipodean said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
On replay it went forward from his hands, slightly. Not enough to overrule the initial play on call and for mine, certainly not egregious enough to rule out the try already awarded.
I don't get it. It went forward but it should be ignored because great try?
@Bones said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@antipodean said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
On replay it went forward from his hands, slightly. Not enough to overrule the initial play on call and for mine, certainly not egregious enough to rule out the try already awarded.
I don't get it. It went forward but it should be ignored because great try?
I don't think it was "clear and obvious".
