Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Final: Chiefs v Crusaders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
chiefscrusaders
912 Posts 78 Posters 58.5k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • DamoD Damo

    Are the current Crusaders the greatest dynasty in professional sport?

    7 titles in a row is an extraordinary accomplishment. Has any other pro team achieved that in any sport?

    CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #618

    @Damo

    They're up there for sure. Liverpool and the Pittsburgh Steelers in the 70s/80s, Rabbitohs in the 50s/60s, Man U in the 90s, Celtic in the 2010s, Canterbury in the 2010s all pretty impressive records. Probably a bunch more football teams in other leagues.

    Cantab79C boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    • CanerbryC Canerbry

      There were two "shockers" by the ref tonight. ALB should have gotten a red, which would have had a major impact on the game, and a missed forward pass several phases before a try was scored, which would have had a marginal impact on the match at the time.

      All of the rest were pretty normal ruby calls, nothing to call the WAHHHHHHHHAMBULANCE about.

      F Offline
      F Offline
      Frank
      wrote on last edited by
      #619

      @Canerbry said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

      There were two "shockers" by the ref tonight. ALB should have gotten a red, which would have had a major impact on the game, and a missed forward pass several phases before a try was scored, which would have had a marginal impact on the match at the time.

      All of the rest were pretty normal ruby calls, nothing to call the WAHHHHHHHHAMBULANCE about.

      Always trust your neutral take.

      CanerbryC 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        SBW1
        wrote on last edited by
        #620

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Frank

          @Canerbry said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

          There were two "shockers" by the ref tonight. ALB should have gotten a red, which would have had a major impact on the game, and a missed forward pass several phases before a try was scored, which would have had a marginal impact on the match at the time.

          All of the rest were pretty normal ruby calls, nothing to call the WAHHHHHHHHAMBULANCE about.

          Always trust your neutral take.

          CanerbryC Offline
          CanerbryC Offline
          Canerbry
          wrote on last edited by
          #621

          @Frank said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

          Always trust your neutral take.

          This is the Fern bro, nobody's neutral.

          1 Reply Last reply
          4
          • CyclopsC Cyclops

            @Damo

            They're up there for sure. Liverpool and the Pittsburgh Steelers in the 70s/80s, Rabbitohs in the 50s/60s, Man U in the 90s, Celtic in the 2010s, Canterbury in the 2010s all pretty impressive records. Probably a bunch more football teams in other leagues.

            Cantab79C Offline
            Cantab79C Offline
            Cantab79
            wrote on last edited by
            #622

            @Cyclops I think the St George Dragons won 11 Premierships in a row.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • boobooB booboo

              Well, fuck.

              As much as I'd like to complain, I can't.

              Close game. One team had to win.

              ALB should have got red ... so ... meh ...

              Congrats Saders.

              boobooB Offline
              boobooB Offline
              booboo
              wrote on last edited by booboo
              #623

              @booboo said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

              Well, fuck.

              As much as I'd like to complain, I can't.

              Close game. One team had to win.

              ALB should have got red ... so ... meh ...

              Congrats Saders.

              Oh yeah. One complaint.

              The forward pass before Taylor's try.

              What the?

              We wuz robbed

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                SBW1
                wrote on last edited by
                #624

                https://www.msn.com/en-gb/sport/news/crusaders-player-ratings-departing-stars-spur-scott-robertson-s-men-to-another-title/ar-AA1cXUPQ

                K 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P Offline
                  P Offline
                  pakman
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #625

                  MSM sucks as per usual. Will be interesting to see if Reason chucks a grenade.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • kiwi_expatK Offline
                    kiwi_expatK Offline
                    kiwi_expat
                    wrote on last edited by kiwi_expat
                    #626

                    At around the 60 minute mark I had massive doubts Crusaders would win this.

                    David Hill has done an outstanding job coaching the Chiefs defense, which has been superior to any team all season.

                    At about the 60 min mark I had massive doubts Crusaders would win this.

                    The Chiefs defence was so good, in that first 10 or so Crusaders would've put in 2 tries against most teams.

                    If Chiefs weren't down to 14 men for 30 mins they would've had this easy.

                    Can you believe the Chiefs' defense coach is going to the World Cup but isn't coaching our defense?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    3
                    • StargazerS Offline
                      StargazerS Offline
                      Stargazer
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #627

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • DonsteppaD Offline
                        DonsteppaD Offline
                        Donsteppa
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #628

                        https://twitter.com/pineynz/status/1672527672206061568?s=20

                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                        8
                        • DonsteppaD Donsteppa

                          https://twitter.com/pineynz/status/1672527672206061568?s=20

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Machpants
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #629

                          @Donsteppa said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                          https://twitter.com/pineynz/status/1672527672206061568?s=20

                          38fb0320-04dc-44d7-919a-1a468081a722-image.png

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          4
                          • StagS Offline
                            StagS Offline
                            Stag
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #630

                            That game was the best advertisement yet why Cane should not be the AB captain. Should be Whitelock this year and Barrett going forward.

                            gt12G BovidaeB 2 Replies Last reply
                            3
                            • StagS Stag

                              That game was the best advertisement yet why Cane should not be the AB captain. Should be Whitelock this year and Barrett going forward.

                              gt12G Offline
                              gt12G Offline
                              gt12
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #631

                              @Stag said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                              That game was the best advertisement yet why Cane should not be the AB captain. Should be Whitelock this year and Barrett going forward.

                              Interesting take. The only really strange strategic or tactical error came when we kicked for goal from 53 out. Cane was off the field by that time and so was Weber. We were let down but I won’t blame Cane for going for a turnover two metres out from our line.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              6
                              • CanerbryC Offline
                                CanerbryC Offline
                                Canerbry
                                wrote on last edited by Canerbry
                                #632

                                The Crusaders' wall in the last 7 minutes won the game.

                                Not what I expected, which was for us to battle stoically for 60 mins but lose in a battle of attrition to a team with better players, with one of World Rugby's most feral home crowds getting under the head of the officials with those godawful vuvucowbells.

                                But, no. What we got was an awesome contest, margin on a knife-edge all game, and it all hinged on playing smarter. What the Crusaders needed with a B- squad was to reduce it to an arm wrestle and then take their chances, and pray for mistakes or brain implosions from the opposition. And luckily the Chiefs were pretty fucking stupid most of the match. Right in front of the ref. They were the better team in flashes in the first half, and for the first 11 minutes or so of the second, but they were given heaps of chances to play smarter and blew it. There's probably more than half a dozen deliberate decisions taken by the Chiefs in the second half that with the benefit of hindsight they would have done something different.

                                And the Crusaders kept them close, played to their strengths, played down the right end of the field, were patient and disciplined, and stole it.

                                In an arm wrestle sometimes the key head-to-heads become critical, where key players are utilised or targeted and nullified, and tonight in a couple of key places were edged or dominated by the winners.

                                Mo'ounga > Dmac
                                Whitelock > Retallick
                                Christie > Cane

                                The best team won the final and are champions.

                                Cantab79C KiwiMurphK P 3 Replies Last reply
                                1
                                • CanerbryC Canerbry

                                  The Crusaders' wall in the last 7 minutes won the game.

                                  Not what I expected, which was for us to battle stoically for 60 mins but lose in a battle of attrition to a team with better players, with one of World Rugby's most feral home crowds getting under the head of the officials with those godawful vuvucowbells.

                                  But, no. What we got was an awesome contest, margin on a knife-edge all game, and it all hinged on playing smarter. What the Crusaders needed with a B- squad was to reduce it to an arm wrestle and then take their chances, and pray for mistakes or brain implosions from the opposition. And luckily the Chiefs were pretty fucking stupid most of the match. Right in front of the ref. They were the better team in flashes in the first half, and for the first 11 minutes or so of the second, but they were given heaps of chances to play smarter and blew it. There's probably more than half a dozen deliberate decisions taken by the Chiefs in the second half that with the benefit of hindsight they would have done something different.

                                  And the Crusaders kept them close, played to their strengths, played down the right end of the field, were patient and disciplined, and stole it.

                                  In an arm wrestle sometimes the key head-to-heads become critical, where key players are utilised or targeted and nullified, and tonight in a couple of key places were edged or dominated by the winners.

                                  Mo'ounga > Dmac
                                  Whitelock > Retallick
                                  Christie > Cane

                                  The best team won the final and are champions.

                                  Cantab79C Offline
                                  Cantab79C Offline
                                  Cantab79
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #633

                                  @Canerbry said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                                  The Crusaders' wall in the last 7 minutes won the game.

                                  That was epic. We made 30-40 metres without the ball and reduced the Chiefs to playing one-off the rucks and seemingly playing for time. The Crusaders found a second wind and it some them the game.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  2
                                  • CanerbryC Canerbry

                                    The Crusaders' wall in the last 7 minutes won the game.

                                    Not what I expected, which was for us to battle stoically for 60 mins but lose in a battle of attrition to a team with better players, with one of World Rugby's most feral home crowds getting under the head of the officials with those godawful vuvucowbells.

                                    But, no. What we got was an awesome contest, margin on a knife-edge all game, and it all hinged on playing smarter. What the Crusaders needed with a B- squad was to reduce it to an arm wrestle and then take their chances, and pray for mistakes or brain implosions from the opposition. And luckily the Chiefs were pretty fucking stupid most of the match. Right in front of the ref. They were the better team in flashes in the first half, and for the first 11 minutes or so of the second, but they were given heaps of chances to play smarter and blew it. There's probably more than half a dozen deliberate decisions taken by the Chiefs in the second half that with the benefit of hindsight they would have done something different.

                                    And the Crusaders kept them close, played to their strengths, played down the right end of the field, were patient and disciplined, and stole it.

                                    In an arm wrestle sometimes the key head-to-heads become critical, where key players are utilised or targeted and nullified, and tonight in a couple of key places were edged or dominated by the winners.

                                    Mo'ounga > Dmac
                                    Whitelock > Retallick
                                    Christie > Cane

                                    The best team won the final and are champions.

                                    KiwiMurphK Online
                                    KiwiMurphK Online
                                    KiwiMurph
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #634

                                    @Canerbry said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                                    Whitelock > Retallick

                                    Surely the far bigger discrepancy was

                                    Scott Barrett > Vaai

                                    Scooter was everywhere whereas Vaai was nowhere.

                                    M Cantab79C gt12G StagS 4 Replies Last reply
                                    15
                                    • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                                      @Canerbry said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                                      Whitelock > Retallick

                                      Surely the far bigger discrepancy was

                                      Scott Barrett > Vaai

                                      Scooter was everywhere whereas Vaai was nowhere.

                                      M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Machpants
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #635

                                      @KiwiMurph said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                                      @Canerbry said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                                      Whitelock > Retallick

                                      Surely the far bigger discrepancy was

                                      Scott Barrett > Vaai

                                      Scooter was everywhere whereas Vaai was nowhere.

                                      Barrett > Whitelock > BBBR he was immense and MotM. All around the field

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                                        @Canerbry said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                                        Whitelock > Retallick

                                        Surely the far bigger discrepancy was

                                        Scott Barrett > Vaai

                                        Scooter was everywhere whereas Vaai was nowhere.

                                        Cantab79C Offline
                                        Cantab79C Offline
                                        Cantab79
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #636

                                        @KiwiMurph said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                                        @Canerbry said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                                        Whitelock > Retallick

                                        Surely the far bigger discrepancy was

                                        Scott Barrett > Vaai

                                        Scooter was everywhere whereas Vaai was nowhere.

                                        Whitelock's work at lineout time was unsurpassed.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                                          @Canerbry said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                                          Whitelock > Retallick

                                          Surely the far bigger discrepancy was

                                          Scott Barrett > Vaai

                                          Scooter was everywhere whereas Vaai was nowhere.

                                          gt12G Offline
                                          gt12G Offline
                                          gt12
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #637

                                          @KiwiMurph said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                                          @Canerbry said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                                          Whitelock > Retallick

                                          Surely the far bigger discrepancy was

                                          Scott Barrett > Vaai

                                          Scooter was everywhere whereas Vaai was nowhere.

                                          Absolutely.

                                          I'm not sure that Mo'unga was actually better than Dmac either and Christie versus Cane is well, anyway.

                                          The thing that worries me about Mo'unga (and I'm happy to recognise that the Chiefs and other Super teams give them these opportunities) is that the Saders get downfield and in great positions off piggyback penalties and poor discipline.

                                          His kicking game and manipulation of the field of play is not usually the reason that his team gets in the position to get points. Once they are there, he is lethal and tonight he was good in helping them get one good try, but if the Chiefs had better discipline, I think we'd easily be giving the kicking game to the Chiefs. That's a AB concern IMO.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search