Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

QF - Canterbury v Auckland

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
canterburyauckland
122 Posts 18 Posters 3.9k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S SBW1

    Did Harford play against Auckland? Fegus Burke got an injury, Saders will definetly be after a new 10 next year.

    ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    wrote on last edited by
    #111

    @SBW1

    They have signed Rivez Reihana,But they will need another First Five as cover for Burke by the looks of that injury.

    Harford didn't play against Auckland they dropped him out of the 23 after he had a shocker against Waikato the previous week.
    I doubt the Crusaders will sign him he has not had a great NPC when he has been given game time.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      SBW1
      wrote on last edited by
      #112

      What is the story with Aaron Cruden, was there any truth to the rumours he was in talks with the Saders?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • DuluthD Duluth

        @TJ said in QF - Canterbury v Auckland:

        it probably was a selection decision, but that suggests there are no 10s they trust enough for a Quarterfinal.

        Plummer was injured. I would've started Evans in the midfield and had McKenzie on the bench (with Tele'a or XTH). McKenzie is good enough.

        So it was just a selection risk they took (or perhaps McKenzie was injured too? There's been no injury list published)

        T Offline
        T Offline
        TJ
        wrote on last edited by
        #113

        @Duluth it just strikes me as wild that the 3rd best 10 in Auckland and the 3rd best 10 in Canterbury (incl Mounga) are players who predominantly play midfield and most likely won't play 10 regularly at a higher level.

        I have been thinking for a while that NZ is extremely poor in the development of 10s, would love to know if the talent just isn't coming through or if there just isn't trust in young 10s, they so often seem to get pushed to fullback to develop.

        ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • T TJ

          @Duluth it just strikes me as wild that the 3rd best 10 in Auckland and the 3rd best 10 in Canterbury (incl Mounga) are players who predominantly play midfield and most likely won't play 10 regularly at a higher level.

          I have been thinking for a while that NZ is extremely poor in the development of 10s, would love to know if the talent just isn't coming through or if there just isn't trust in young 10s, they so often seem to get pushed to fullback to develop.

          ACT CrusaderA Offline
          ACT CrusaderA Offline
          ACT Crusader
          wrote on last edited by
          #114

          @TJ said in QF - Canterbury v Auckland:

          @Duluth it just strikes me as wild that the 3rd best 10 in Auckland and the 3rd best 10 in Canterbury (incl Mounga) are players who predominantly play midfield and most likely won't play 10 regularly at a higher level.

          I have been thinking for a while that NZ is extremely poor in the development of 10s, would love to know if the talent just isn't coming through or if there just isn't trust in young 10s, they so often seem to get pushed to fullback to develop.

          I think this is a tad overreaction. It goes in cycles. We’ve had periods where there were more 1st 5s than you could poke a stick at. Then there have been lean periods.

          Given how the game is these days and the use of bench players, versatility is more important so I don’t think the Canterbury selections were that risky really.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            SBW1
            wrote on last edited by
            #115

            We certainly don't have a shortage of halfbacks. We seem to be using makeshift 10s.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • DuluthD Duluth

              @TJ said in QF - Canterbury v Auckland:

              it probably was a selection decision, but that suggests there are no 10s they trust enough for a Quarterfinal.

              Plummer was injured. I would've started Evans in the midfield and had McKenzie on the bench (with Tele'a or XTH). McKenzie is good enough.

              So it was just a selection risk they took (or perhaps McKenzie was injured too? There's been no injury list published)

              KiwiMurphK Offline
              KiwiMurphK Offline
              KiwiMurph
              wrote on last edited by
              #116

              @Duluth said in QF - Canterbury v Auckland:

              Plummer was injured. I would've started Evans in the midfield and had McKenzie on the bench (with Tele'a or XTH). McKenzie is good enough.

              Evans got exposed badly in midfield vs Waikato.

              Would have been nice to see that standout Rovers 12 make the squad and get some game time though....

              DuluthD S 2 Replies Last reply
              1
              • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                @Duluth said in QF - Canterbury v Auckland:

                Plummer was injured. I would've started Evans in the midfield and had McKenzie on the bench (with Tele'a or XTH). McKenzie is good enough.

                Evans got exposed badly in midfield vs Waikato.

                Would have been nice to see that standout Rovers 12 make the squad and get some game time though....

                DuluthD Offline
                DuluthD Offline
                Duluth
                wrote on last edited by Duluth
                #117

                @KiwiMurph

                He should've been called up when Plummer first got injured.

                The contract situation is genuinely retarded though. The system does not work

                We know Evans was on year three of a three year deal. Tele'a when he came back from Counties probably signed on for at least two years? The SR players were already contracted. So they had 4/5 midfielders before club rugby kicked off

                Even sides without large number of SR players are forced to contract earlier and earlier

                By my count ~28 players would've been contract before the club season kicked off. Then there was 4-5 spots that went to age group players (Clark, Spencer, XTH etc) leaving a dribble for players in club rugby

                The Canterbury squad would be even worse. I think they would've had in the low 30's contracted from SR not club rugby

                It's completely broken

                KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • DuluthD Duluth

                  @KiwiMurph

                  He should've been called up when Plummer first got injured.

                  The contract situation is genuinely retarded though. The system does not work

                  We know Evans was on year three of a three year deal. Tele'a when he came back from Counties probably signed on for at least two years? The SR players were already contracted. So they had 4/5 midfielders before club rugby kicked off

                  Even sides without large number of SR players are forced to contract earlier and earlier

                  By my count ~28 players would've been contract before the club season kicked off. Then there was 4-5 spots that went to age group players (Clark, Spencer, XTH etc) leaving a dribble for players in club rugby

                  The Canterbury squad would be even worse. I think they would've had in the low 30's contracted from SR not club rugby

                  It's completely broken

                  KiwiMurphK Offline
                  KiwiMurphK Offline
                  KiwiMurph
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #118

                  @Duluth said in QF - Canterbury v Auckland:

                  The contract situation is genuinely retarded though. The system does not work

                  100%.

                  Then it feeds through to the next level. At best if a player has a standout NPC and is not already contracted to Super the best they can hope for is a Wider Training Squad spot unless they are super lucky and a franchise has a spot free in their position.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                    @Duluth said in QF - Canterbury v Auckland:

                    Plummer was injured. I would've started Evans in the midfield and had McKenzie on the bench (with Tele'a or XTH). McKenzie is good enough.

                    Evans got exposed badly in midfield vs Waikato.

                    Would have been nice to see that standout Rovers 12 make the squad and get some game time though....

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Steven Harris
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #119

                    @KiwiMurph Faletoi Peni’s agent is already in discussions with other Unions , i can tell you that is fact
                    The problem with Auckland , they have tried to manufacture midfield backs without settling on the next best one from club
                    The best midfield pairing in the Auckland club comp were Faletoi Peni and Amanaki Savieti from Manukau Rovers.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • Crazy HorseC Crazy Horse

                      @ACT-Crusader said in QF - Canterbury v Auckland:

                      @KiwiMurph said in QF - Canterbury v Auckland:

                      Thought Grace played pretty well

                      Ran the ball with a bit of purpose (and didn’t break)

                      I have a feeling he did break. Just prior to going off the medics were looking at his shoulder, then a few moments later he had a short run down the sideline and looked weird in the way he took the contact with his shoulder. He wasn't seen on camera again.

                      ChrisC Offline
                      ChrisC Offline
                      Chris
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #120

                      @Crazy-Horse said in QF - Canterbury v Auckland:

                      @ACT-Crusader said in QF - Canterbury v Auckland:

                      @KiwiMurph said in QF - Canterbury v Auckland:

                      Thought Grace played pretty well

                      Ran the ball with a bit of purpose (and didn’t break)

                      I have a feeling he did break. Just prior to going off the medics were looking at his shoulder, then a few moments later he had a short run down the sideline and looked weird in the way he took the contact with his shoulder. He wasn't seen on camera again.

                      Grace is fine he will play in the SF.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • StargazerS Offline
                        StargazerS Offline
                        Stargazer
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #121

                        Arguably the worst high tackle to go unpunished was just last week, when Auckland wing AJ Lam knocked the snot out of Canterbury replacement Blair Murray in Christchurch.

                        Bourke was amongst those puzzled referee Nick Briant didn’t show Lam a card, despite Murray going on to score a try.

                        It turns out Lam, who scored a try shortly after knocking Murray’s block off, has since been cited after it was deemed the hit met the red card threshold, and Briant later called Bourke.

                        https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/provincial/300987505/npc-talking-points-why-tmos-in-provincial-rugby-have-less-power

                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • StargazerS Stargazer

                          Arguably the worst high tackle to go unpunished was just last week, when Auckland wing AJ Lam knocked the snot out of Canterbury replacement Blair Murray in Christchurch.

                          Bourke was amongst those puzzled referee Nick Briant didn’t show Lam a card, despite Murray going on to score a try.

                          It turns out Lam, who scored a try shortly after knocking Murray’s block off, has since been cited after it was deemed the hit met the red card threshold, and Briant later called Bourke.

                          https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/provincial/300987505/npc-talking-points-why-tmos-in-provincial-rugby-have-less-power

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Machpants
                          wrote on last edited by Machpants
                          #122

                          @Stargazer said in QF - Canterbury v Auckland:

                          Arguably the worst high tackle to go unpunished was just last week, when Auckland wing AJ Lam knocked the snot out of Canterbury replacement Blair Murray in Christchurch.

                          Bourke was amongst those puzzled referee Nick Briant didn’t show Lam a card, despite Murray going on to score a try.

                          It turns out Lam, who scored a try shortly after knocking Murray’s block off, has since been cited after it was deemed the hit met the red card threshold, and Briant later called Bourke.

                          https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/provincial/300987505/npc-talking-points-why-tmos-in-provincial-rugby-have-less-power

                          A Ranfurly Shield rematch

                          Yes, the Log o’ Wood isn’t on the line, but Saturday night’s semifinal between Wellington and Hawke’s Bay is a beaut match-up nonetheless.

                          Logs

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Search
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Search