QF - Chiefs v Reds
-
@NTA said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@Damo said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
I feel like a YC is coming unless they stop giving away PK's.
Pffft. No need to start enforcing the laws
Alright. Settle down mate.
@Damo said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@NTA said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@Damo said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
I feel like a YC is coming unless they stop giving away PK's.
Pffft. No need to start enforcing the laws
Alright. Settle down mate.
If bones can do it, so can I
-
@Damo said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
I feel like a YC is coming unless they stop giving away PK's.
Pffft. No need to start enforcing the laws
@NTA said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@Damo said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
I feel like a YC is coming unless they stop giving away PK's.
Pffft. No need to start enforcing the laws
Teams that are getting their arse handed to them don't tend to get the whistle.
-
@NTA said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@Damo said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
I feel like a YC is coming unless they stop giving away PK's.
Pffft. No need to start enforcing the laws
Teams that are getting their arse handed to them don't tend to get the whistle.
@KiwiMurph Shouldn't matter when it comes to head contact.
-
@KiwiMurph Shouldn't matter when it comes to head contact.
@Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@KiwiMurph Shouldn't matter when it comes to head contact.
Agreed there
-
@KiwiMurph Shouldn't matter when it comes to head contact.
@Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@KiwiMurph Shouldn't matter when it comes to head contact.
Was there actually head contact though? I thought it was not to the head.
Still a YC because it was reckless and dangerous.
-
@Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@KiwiMurph Shouldn't matter when it comes to head contact.
Was there actually head contact though? I thought it was not to the head.
Still a YC because it was reckless and dangerous.
@Damo said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Still a YC because it was reckless and dangerous.
In what is effectively the red zone
-
@Damo said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Still a YC because it was reckless and dangerous.
In what is effectively the red zone
@NTA said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@Damo said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Still a YC because it was reckless and dangerous.
In what is effectively the red zone
-
@KiwiMurph Shouldn't matter when it comes to head contact.
@Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@KiwiMurph Shouldn't matter when it comes to head contact.
What? He got hit in the shoulder, not the head. There was no head contact
-
@KiwiMurph said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@Bones said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
This Stevenson has to be an AB
Not having to defend, sitting behind a team smashing their opposition?
Ooh...to be fair though...if people are happy to have Jordan for the occasional outrageous attacking play, I don't see what the problem is with Stevenson.
-
@Damo said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Still a YC because it was reckless and dangerous.
In what is effectively the red zone
@NTA said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@Damo said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Still a YC because it was reckless and dangerous.
In what is effectively the red zone
Big red zone these days.
-
@Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Anyway - one sided finals match in front of an empty stadium sums this shit up.
As opposed to that down to the wire Origin eh?
@KiwiMurph Blues were more competitive a man down than the Reds here.
And yeah - it was a sell out watched by millions...
-
@pakman said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Chiefs fans missing a statement performance.Canes should be worried.
We won here two weeks ago, the Reds arenāt the Hurricanes. Chiefs looking good though but the Reds havenāt turned up.
