• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Blues vs. Chiefs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
blueschiefs
123 Posts 31 Posters 17.9k Views
Blues vs. Chiefs
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NorthlandalldayN Offline
    NorthlandalldayN Offline
    Northlandallday
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by booboo
    #108

    @KiwiMurph said in Blues vs. Chiefs:

    @Tim Yeah that Bidwell muppet is legit anti Blues every week in his column - what a knob

    Bidwell, is well known for his muppetness, when I see he's the journo, I know not to bother reading.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    wrote on last edited by
    #109

    Well, neither team deserved to win that.
    For all the niggle they dish out the Chiefs are a pack of fucking whingers. Every whistle there is someone bitching at the ref. Steven Moore would fit in well. This is one reason i don't like the co-captain thing. It just doubles the amount of whinging.

    Collins must do a hell of a lot of organising (maybe he brings the half time oranges and washes the jersies) because he does fuck all else other than run slowly, not break tackles and throw the occasional shitty offload. A single break from Nanai could have won that game for them.
    Rieko was the only back that looked like breaking the line for the Blues. SBW a couple of good touches but still well off proving he is worthy of an AB spot.
    As someone said above, Pulu isn't the 9 the Blues need. His constant pausing at the base just fucks their momentum. Not giving the pass to Francis for a droppie just prior to the final missed penalty was costly. He had just got a new advantage, why just knock it on?

    Dmac has to be in the AB squad now i think. I have doubts about his game fitting test rugby but they need to find a way to use him. I don't see why he couldn't be used at 14. He has the fullback skills and pace and isn't much smaller than NMS.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #110

    @Tim said in Blues vs. Chiefs:

    @African-Monkey He's played well the last few weeks. Certainly better than Riccitelli (poor this season) and Harris.

    He's behind Taylor, Coltman, and Coles though.

    I guess you have only watched the Crusaders v Hurricanes game then? Riccitelli is by no means poor this season. Maybe not as exciting as many expected him to be based on only a few games last season. He had a bad game against the Crusaders but apart from that he's been reasonably good and certainly not the worst of the NZ hookers. Considering he's been covering for Coles all season; has not had any rest because of Coles' injury (and Apisai not being good enough for a start), I think he's done a fine job for a 22 year old in his first full season.

    TimT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
    #111

    I hope this is legible (it is on a computer):

    0_1495794615240_upload-97281c46-e2a3-47e0-80dd-9363b50cdd5d

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #112

    @Stargazer

    Is there anywhere that gives % lineout success?

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #113

    @booboo

    % own line-out wins

    Crusaders 93 (1st in ranking)
    Hurricanes 89 (8th)
    Blues 89 (9th)
    Chiefs 88 (11th)
    Highlanders 87 (15th)

    source: Fox Sports Lab

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by Tim
    #114

    @Stargazer I misphrased it. He is a very promising young player (would love it if the Blues signed him), and is developing well (continues to perform very well for his age), but by All Black standards (for 2017 selection) he's hasn't had a good year.

    StargazerS NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #115

    @Tim I don't think anyone has been suggesting he should be playing for the ABs this year, or even next year. What people have been saying is that he has all the potential to become a good All Black hooker in the future. Personally, I have suggested that - considering the relative lack of depth at hooker (Coltman is pretty average, Parsons is shit as an AB hooker, Harris is very injury prone) - it would be a good idea to bring him in the AB environment sooner rather than later (as an apprentice) to learn as much as he can, as soon as he can, to prime him for when multiple injuries strike again.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    replied to Tim on last edited by Nepia
    #116

    @Tim said in Blues vs. Chiefs:

    @Stargazer I misphrased it. He is a very promising young player (would love it if the Blues signed him), and is developing well (continues to perform very well for his age), but by All Black standards (for 2017 selection) he's hasn't had a good year.

    He's in danger of being the next Rhys Marshall, whose career went downhill after he left the Magpies .... 😉

    Our hooking stocks aren't great if Coltman is in the frame (I may have mentioned this once or twice before).

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #117

    @Stargazer Those lineout stats are surprising to me - in that they suggest that pretty much every team wins nine out of ten lineouts on their own throw.

    My perception from watching would have been that even the very best lineouts would only win about 8/10.

    I wonder at what point they call the lineout "won"?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #118

    @Stargazer said in Blues vs. Chiefs:

    @Tim I don't think anyone has been suggesting he should be playing for the ABs this year, or even next year. What people have been saying is that he has all the potential to become a good All Black hooker in the future. Personally, I have suggested that - considering the relative lack of depth at hooker (Coltman is pretty average, Parsons is shit as an AB hooker, Harris is very injury prone) - it would be a good idea to bring him in the AB environment sooner rather than later (as an apprentice) to learn as much as he can, as soon as he can, to prime him for when multiple injuries strike again.

    How do you judge someone's selection worth on being "injury prone"?
    Unless they show a repeating tendency to technically do something poorly that causes injuries, it is just bad luck.
    Saying "let's not invest in this guy because he gets injured " is silly and I think you'll find the AB selectors think the same.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Crucial on last edited by Stargazer
    #119

    @Crucial This wasn't about "selection worth". I didn't mention Harris being injury prone as a reason for not selecting him. It was about the need (in my view) to prep a talent like Riccitelli for AB duties in case Harris (or other AB hookers) is injured. Read the last part of my paragraph!

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #120

    @Stargazer said in Blues vs. Chiefs:

    @Crucial This wasn't about "selection worth". I didn't mention Harris being injury prone as a reason for not selecting him. It was about the need (in my view) to prep a talent like Riccitelli for AB duties in case Harris (or other AB hookers) is injured. Read the last part of my paragraph!

    fair enough. Reading comprehension at 6am not all it should be.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #121

    @Crucial said in Blues vs. Chiefs:

    DMac putting his hand up bigtime for a utility spot. He has taken control of things for the Chiefs and not just with broken running. Great decision making and kicking.

    If for some bizarre reason he doesn't get selected, I'll adopt him so he can play for Wales

    Stockcar86S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stockcar86S Offline
    Stockcar86S Offline
    Stockcar86
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #122

    @MiketheSnow said in Blues vs. Chiefs:

    @Crucial said in Blues vs. Chiefs:

    DMac putting his hand up bigtime for a utility spot. He has taken control of things for the Chiefs and not just with broken running. Great decision making and kicking.

    If for some bizarre reason he doesn't get selected, I'll adopt him so he can play for Wales

    Not Damian, but you can have Marty

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #123

    Did I miss comments on Chiefs scrum? Hames had Charlie F in real trouble a couple of times, something one doesn't often see. Laulala also seemed to shade Tu-ungafasi, who I thought didn't go badly. Pat T didn't show much. Neither did Bird, who was not amused when substituted on 53! Thought Blues loosies again were the more impressive. Cane seemed to me somewhat of a one man band.
    Interesting that Crusaders top the table, with perhaps 9 All black forwards, but only two backs.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Blues vs. Chiefs
Rugby Matches
blueschiefs
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.