Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Hurricanes v Chiefs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
hurricaneschiefs
326 Posts 40 Posters 8.8k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • TimT Tim

    @nepia said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

    Prinsep

    Signed for another year, I think.

    StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
    #8

    @tim said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

    @nepia said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

    Prinsep

    Signed for another year, I think.

    Yes, was announced yesterday, but he has re-signed for two years.

    https://twitter.com/Hurricanesrugby/status/1018979995039948800

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • TimT Tim

      @nepia said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

      Prinsep

      Signed for another year, I think.

      NepiaN Offline
      NepiaN Offline
      Nepia
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      @tim said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

      @nepia said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

      Prinsep

      Signed for another year, I think.

      I know, that's why I said contract extension. 😉

      I'm just wondering if any Ferners rate him highly.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • FrankF Offline
        FrankF Offline
        Frank
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        Chiefs for the win. I think their forward pack is better.
        Fifita can't even make the starting line-up.

        MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • PaekakboyzP Offline
          PaekakboyzP Offline
          Paekakboyz
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          Hoping home ground game goes our way. Don't have much else going for us, def need our forwards to all hit form to match that chiefs pack. BB v DMac will be fucking awesome though.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • StargazerS Offline
            StargazerS Offline
            Stargazer
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/105597608/Hurricanes-captain-Brad-Shields-declares-himself-fit-for-Fridays-quarterfinal

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ShadowTrooperS Offline
              ShadowTrooperS Offline
              ShadowTrooper
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              I would love a Chiefs win

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • WingerW Offline
                WingerW Offline
                Winger
                wrote on last edited by Winger
                #14

                Looking at these sides and recent form I don't believe the Canes have a hope of winning. The Canes forward pack is one of the worst they have put out esp in recent years. Individually all are OK but there are no impact or top level AB forwards to provide any punch or moments of brilliance. We are missing two AB hookers and Fidow and Savea who can provide some impact are both out. So its an unbalanced pack with two locks that don't work well together and two props that were ordinary in recent matches. The best the Canes can hope for from the forwards is to hold on throughout the match

                And Plumtree use to be able to work magic with these types of forward packs but recently this has gone. The backs have wonderful players but they are ineptly coached by a dreadful attack coach. Ive said before the only attacking plan is smash through with Laumape or kick up and under's and hope for the best.

                The only hope for the Canes is for the backs to totally ignore this limited game plan and throw the ball around. except when hard on defense. then clear the f+++ing ball. Not play around on the touch line. And hope luck (and a lot of it) is on their side

                canefanC ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • WingerW Winger

                  Looking at these sides and recent form I don't believe the Canes have a hope of winning. The Canes forward pack is one of the worst they have put out esp in recent years. Individually all are OK but there are no impact or top level AB forwards to provide any punch or moments of brilliance. We are missing two AB hookers and Fidow and Savea who can provide some impact are both out. So its an unbalanced pack with two locks that don't work well together and two props that were ordinary in recent matches. The best the Canes can hope for from the forwards is to hold on throughout the match

                  And Plumtree use to be able to work magic with these types of forward packs but recently this has gone. The backs have wonderful players but they are ineptly coached by a dreadful attack coach. Ive said before the only attacking plan is smash through with Laumape or kick up and under's and hope for the best.

                  The only hope for the Canes is for the backs to totally ignore this limited game plan and throw the ball around. except when hard on defense. then clear the f+++ing ball. Not play around on the touch line. And hope luck (and a lot of it) is on their side

                  canefanC Offline
                  canefanC Offline
                  canefan
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  @winger said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                  Looking at these sides and recent form I don't believe the Canes have a hope of winning. The Canes forward pack is one of the worst they have put out esp in recent years. Individually all are OK but there are no impact or top level AB forwards to provide any punch or moments of brilliance. We are missing two AB hookers and Fidow and Savea who can provide some impact are both out. So its an unbalanced pack with two locks that don't work well together and two props that were ordinary in recent matches. The best the Canes can hope for from the forwards is to hold on throughout the match

                  And Plumtree use to be able to work magic with these types of forward packs but recently this has gone. The backs have wonderful players but they are ineptly coached by a dreadful attack coach. Ive said before the only attacking plan is smash through with Laumape or kick up and under's and hope for the best.

                  The only hope for the Canes is for the backs to totally ignore this limited game plan and throw the ball around. except when hard on defense. then clear the f+++ing ball. Not play around on the touch line. And hope luck (and a lot of it) is on their side

                  Inciteful. We will lose the battle up front, don't have the razzle dazzle in the backs of previous years, and the Chiefs have some big guns coming back. I can't see the Canes winning this, sadly.

                  ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • canefanC canefan

                    @winger said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                    Looking at these sides and recent form I don't believe the Canes have a hope of winning. The Canes forward pack is one of the worst they have put out esp in recent years. Individually all are OK but there are no impact or top level AB forwards to provide any punch or moments of brilliance. We are missing two AB hookers and Fidow and Savea who can provide some impact are both out. So its an unbalanced pack with two locks that don't work well together and two props that were ordinary in recent matches. The best the Canes can hope for from the forwards is to hold on throughout the match

                    And Plumtree use to be able to work magic with these types of forward packs but recently this has gone. The backs have wonderful players but they are ineptly coached by a dreadful attack coach. Ive said before the only attacking plan is smash through with Laumape or kick up and under's and hope for the best.

                    The only hope for the Canes is for the backs to totally ignore this limited game plan and throw the ball around. except when hard on defense. then clear the f+++ing ball. Not play around on the touch line. And hope luck (and a lot of it) is on their side

                    Inciteful. We will lose the battle up front, don't have the razzle dazzle in the backs of previous years, and the Chiefs have some big guns coming back. I can't see the Canes winning this, sadly.

                    ChrisC Offline
                    ChrisC Offline
                    Chris
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    @canefan I think you have nailed it the Chiefs will win this, they seem to want it more looking from the outside

                    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • WingerW Winger

                      Looking at these sides and recent form I don't believe the Canes have a hope of winning. The Canes forward pack is one of the worst they have put out esp in recent years. Individually all are OK but there are no impact or top level AB forwards to provide any punch or moments of brilliance. We are missing two AB hookers and Fidow and Savea who can provide some impact are both out. So its an unbalanced pack with two locks that don't work well together and two props that were ordinary in recent matches. The best the Canes can hope for from the forwards is to hold on throughout the match

                      And Plumtree use to be able to work magic with these types of forward packs but recently this has gone. The backs have wonderful players but they are ineptly coached by a dreadful attack coach. Ive said before the only attacking plan is smash through with Laumape or kick up and under's and hope for the best.

                      The only hope for the Canes is for the backs to totally ignore this limited game plan and throw the ball around. except when hard on defense. then clear the f+++ing ball. Not play around on the touch line. And hope luck (and a lot of it) is on their side

                      ACT CrusaderA Offline
                      ACT CrusaderA Offline
                      ACT Crusader
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      @winger Canes capacity to clear the ball wont be helped with Skudder playing fullback. He has a limited long kicking game. He’s one of the better chip/grubber and chase guys going around but in terms of clearances he has rugby league-esque type range.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • CrucialC Offline
                        CrucialC Offline
                        Crucial
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        I may be relying on some TSF game commentary for this one. Have just checked into a decent hotel in Switzerland with strong wifi but Sky UK are pretty good at the whack-a-mole game of blocking VPN IP addresses. Have a few lined up and hopefully one works but if not I may be calling on here.

                        P 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • boobooB Offline
                          boobooB Offline
                          booboo
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          @Winger @Chris @canefan look at all the Canes fans scrambling for underdog status.

                          Face it guys it's yours to lose. 10 in a row. Most lethal backline in the comp.

                          Imagine if you lost it from here ...

                          ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
                          4
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Machpants
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            The more relevant than '10 in a row' is lost last 4 out of 5, icluding against a weakened next-up opponent

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • boobooB booboo

                              @Winger @Chris @canefan look at all the Canes fans scrambling for underdog status.

                              Face it guys it's yours to lose. 10 in a row. Most lethal backline in the comp.

                              Imagine if you lost it from here ...

                              ChrisC Offline
                              ChrisC Offline
                              Chris
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              @booboo Haha mate I am a Crusaders fan just calling like I see it Chiefs to win

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • CrucialC Offline
                                CrucialC Offline
                                Crucial
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                Chiefs have firm claim to being underdogs..
                                Don’t forget that the Canes ditched the Chiefs coach years ago.

                                NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • CrucialC Crucial

                                  Chiefs have firm claim to being underdogs..
                                  Don’t forget that the Canes ditched the Chiefs coach years ago.

                                  NepiaN Offline
                                  NepiaN Offline
                                  Nepia
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  @crucial said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                                  Chiefs have firm claim to being underdogs..
                                  Don’t forget that the Canes ditched the Chiefs coach years ago.

                                  They did ditch him for the Hammetuer so it evens out a bit. But Canes are definitely favourites, home town advantage and they can't keep playing as shit as they have been so far. The Chiefs have played above themselves this year but the Canes should be a class above.

                                  KiwiMurphK Chester DrawsC 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • NepiaN Nepia

                                    @crucial said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                                    Chiefs have firm claim to being underdogs..
                                    Don’t forget that the Canes ditched the Chiefs coach years ago.

                                    They did ditch him for the Hammetuer so it evens out a bit. But Canes are definitely favourites, home town advantage and they can't keep playing as shit as they have been so far. The Chiefs have played above themselves this year but the Canes should be a class above.

                                    KiwiMurphK Offline
                                    KiwiMurphK Offline
                                    KiwiMurph
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    @nepia said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                                    @crucial said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                                    Chiefs have firm claim to being underdogs..
                                    Don’t forget that the Canes ditched the Chiefs coach years ago.

                                    The Chiefs have played above themselves this year but the Canes should be a class above.

                                    Not in the forwards. On paper Chiefs forwards look stronger.

                                    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                                      @nepia said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                                      @crucial said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                                      Chiefs have firm claim to being underdogs..
                                      Don’t forget that the Canes ditched the Chiefs coach years ago.

                                      The Chiefs have played above themselves this year but the Canes should be a class above.

                                      Not in the forwards. On paper Chiefs forwards look stronger.

                                      NepiaN Offline
                                      NepiaN Offline
                                      Nepia
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      @kiwimurph said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                                      @nepia said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                                      @crucial said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                                      Chiefs have firm claim to being underdogs..
                                      Don’t forget that the Canes ditched the Chiefs coach years ago.

                                      The Chiefs have played above themselves this year but the Canes should be a class above.

                                      Not in the forwards. On paper Chiefs forwards look stronger.

                                      Shhhhhhhhh.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      4
                                      • NepiaN Nepia

                                        @crucial said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                                        Chiefs have firm claim to being underdogs..
                                        Don’t forget that the Canes ditched the Chiefs coach years ago.

                                        They did ditch him for the Hammetuer so it evens out a bit. But Canes are definitely favourites, home town advantage and they can't keep playing as shit as they have been so far. The Chiefs have played above themselves this year but the Canes should be a class above.

                                        Chester DrawsC Offline
                                        Chester DrawsC Offline
                                        Chester Draws
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #26

                                        @nepia said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                                        @crucial said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                                        Chiefs have firm claim to being underdogs..
                                        Don’t forget that the Canes ditched the Chiefs coach years ago.

                                        They did ditch him for the Hammetuer so it evens out a bit. But Canes are definitely favourites, home town advantage and they can't keep playing as shit as they have been so far. The Chiefs have played above themselves this year but the Canes should be a class above.

                                        "Can't keep playing shit" is one of the more ludicrous reasons to think your team will win.

                                        My college team has been shit all year. The good money is that they will continue to be shit, at least till next season. Teams playing badly don't, as a whole, suddenly find their mojo.

                                        Unless you think the Hurricanes will go "how stupid of us. We should find our form now."It's It's probably under the bed.

                                        If the Hurricanes win, it'll be Barrett magic, rather than suddenly getting good again.

                                        NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
                                        3
                                        • Chester DrawsC Chester Draws

                                          @nepia said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                                          @crucial said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                                          Chiefs have firm claim to being underdogs..
                                          Don’t forget that the Canes ditched the Chiefs coach years ago.

                                          They did ditch him for the Hammetuer so it evens out a bit. But Canes are definitely favourites, home town advantage and they can't keep playing as shit as they have been so far. The Chiefs have played above themselves this year but the Canes should be a class above.

                                          "Can't keep playing shit" is one of the more ludicrous reasons to think your team will win.

                                          My college team has been shit all year. The good money is that they will continue to be shit, at least till next season. Teams playing badly don't, as a whole, suddenly find their mojo.

                                          Unless you think the Hurricanes will go "how stupid of us. We should find our form now."It's It's probably under the bed.

                                          If the Hurricanes win, it'll be Barrett magic, rather than suddenly getting good again.

                                          NepiaN Offline
                                          NepiaN Offline
                                          Nepia
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #27

                                          @chester-draws I think you missed the point of my post (and my team is the other one - you clearly weren't here in the dark days of the endless Hammetuer thread?).

                                          Chester DrawsC 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search