Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Hurricanes v Chiefs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
hurricaneschiefs
326 Posts 40 Posters 8.8k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cgrant
    wrote on last edited by
    #310

    @Chris : How did you rate JTA tonight ? Still rubbish ?:winking_face:

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C cgrant

      @Chris : How did you rate JTA tonight ? Still rubbish ?:winking_face:

      ChrisC Offline
      ChrisC Offline
      Chris
      wrote on last edited by
      #311

      @cgrant he went ok struggled in the scrums abit let’s see how he goes next week still don’t rate him to be honest

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • ShadowTrooperS Offline
        ShadowTrooperS Offline
        ShadowTrooper
        wrote on last edited by
        #312

        Having chewed over my disappointment, I'm hoping the bulk of the squad will return next season and will take some valuable learnings away from this season. We've bedded in Cooper, and he will continue to build the style and lay the foundation for next season and beyond,
        I'm hoping the likes of Ta'avao, Karpik and Allardice return - plus Ardron who along with Ta'avao and Karl T James really surprised me. Alaimalo will have learned a lot I think, and our ABs just need to keep on keeping on. Keep the Faith Chiefs people!

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

          @chris said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

          @canefan I think you have nailed it the Chiefs will win this, they seem to want it more looking from the outside

          Haha what the fuck? Game of two halves. Full credit.

          ChrisC Offline
          ChrisC Offline
          Chris
          wrote on last edited by
          #313

          @mariner4life yeah well played the canes DMac was like an out of control bumble bee

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • CrucialC Crucial

            I may be relying on some TSF game commentary for this one. Have just checked into a decent hotel in Switzerland with strong wifi but Sky UK are pretty good at the whack-a-mole game of blocking VPN IP addresses. Have a few lined up and hopefully one works but if not I may be calling on here.

            P Offline
            P Offline
            pakman
            wrote on last edited by
            #314

            @crucial said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

            I may be relying on some TSF game commentary for this one. Have just checked into a decent hotel in Switzerland with strong wifi but Sky UK are pretty good at the whack-a-mole game of blocking VPN IP addresses. Have a few lined up and hopefully one works but if not I may be calling on here.

            Presume you switch off any Telecom link and location services if watching on 'phone?

            CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P pakman

              @crucial said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

              I may be relying on some TSF game commentary for this one. Have just checked into a decent hotel in Switzerland with strong wifi but Sky UK are pretty good at the whack-a-mole game of blocking VPN IP addresses. Have a few lined up and hopefully one works but if not I may be calling on here.

              Presume you switch off any Telecom link and location services if watching on 'phone?

              CrucialC Offline
              CrucialC Offline
              Crucial
              wrote on last edited by
              #315

              @pakman said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

              @crucial said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

              I may be relying on some TSF game commentary for this one. Have just checked into a decent hotel in Switzerland with strong wifi but Sky UK are pretty good at the whack-a-mole game of blocking VPN IP addresses. Have a few lined up and hopefully one works but if not I may be calling on here.

              Presume you switch off any Telecom link and location services if watching on 'phone?

              They are getting smarter these days with apps that force you to have location services turned on.

              Didn’t end up watching anyway as I forgot the extra hours time difference meant the game would eat into the day too much.
              Will watch the recording at home.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • BonesB Bones

                @chester-draws said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                @nepia said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                @crucial said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                Chiefs have firm claim to being underdogs..
                Don’t forget that the Canes ditched the Chiefs coach years ago.

                They did ditch him for the Hammetuer so it evens out a bit. But Canes are definitely favourites, home town advantage and they can't keep playing as shit as they have been so far. The Chiefs have played above themselves this year but the Canes should be a class above.

                "Can't keep playing shit" is one of the more ludicrous reasons to think your team will win.

                My college team has been shit all year. The good money is that they will continue to be shit, at least till next season. Teams playing badly don't, as a whole, suddenly find their mojo.

                Unless you think the Hurricanes will go "how stupid of us. We should find our form now."It's It's probably under the bed.

                If the Hurricanes win, it'll be Barrett magic, rather than suddenly getting good again.

                How magic was Barrett....

                Chester DrawsC Offline
                Chester DrawsC Offline
                Chester Draws
                wrote on last edited by
                #316

                @bones said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                @chester-draws said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                @nepia said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                @crucial said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                Chiefs have firm claim to being underdogs..
                Don’t forget that the Canes ditched the Chiefs coach years ago.

                They did ditch him for the Hammetuer so it evens out a bit. But Canes are definitely favourites, home town advantage and they can't keep playing as shit as they have been so far. The Chiefs have played above themselves this year but the Canes should be a class above.

                "Can't keep playing shit" is one of the more ludicrous reasons to think your team will win.

                My college team has been shit all year. The good money is that they will continue to be shit, at least till next season. Teams playing badly don't, as a whole, suddenly find their mojo.

                Unless you think the Hurricanes will go "how stupid of us. We should find our form now."It's It's probably under the bed.

                If the Hurricanes win, it'll be Barrett magic, rather than suddenly getting good again.

                How magic was Barrett....

                Well, I though t it would take positive magic from the Barretts. It instead took negative from the Chiefs halves.

                But did the Canes suddenly start playing well, like you suggested? Or did they ride intercepts and dropped balls?

                Still, I'm sure they can't keep playing this badly. No doubt they'll hit their straps and give the Crusaders a stern lesson.

                NepiaN BonesB 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • Chester DrawsC Chester Draws

                  @bones said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                  @chester-draws said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                  @nepia said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                  @crucial said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                  Chiefs have firm claim to being underdogs..
                  Don’t forget that the Canes ditched the Chiefs coach years ago.

                  They did ditch him for the Hammetuer so it evens out a bit. But Canes are definitely favourites, home town advantage and they can't keep playing as shit as they have been so far. The Chiefs have played above themselves this year but the Canes should be a class above.

                  "Can't keep playing shit" is one of the more ludicrous reasons to think your team will win.

                  My college team has been shit all year. The good money is that they will continue to be shit, at least till next season. Teams playing badly don't, as a whole, suddenly find their mojo.

                  Unless you think the Hurricanes will go "how stupid of us. We should find our form now."It's It's probably under the bed.

                  If the Hurricanes win, it'll be Barrett magic, rather than suddenly getting good again.

                  How magic was Barrett....

                  Well, I though t it would take positive magic from the Barretts. It instead took negative from the Chiefs halves.

                  But did the Canes suddenly start playing well, like you suggested? Or did they ride intercepts and dropped balls?

                  Still, I'm sure they can't keep playing this badly. No doubt they'll hit their straps and give the Crusaders a stern lesson.

                  NepiaN Offline
                  NepiaN Offline
                  Nepia
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #317

                  @chester-draws said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                  @bones said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                  @chester-draws said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                  @nepia said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                  @crucial said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                  Chiefs have firm claim to being underdogs..
                  Don’t forget that the Canes ditched the Chiefs coach years ago.

                  They did ditch him for the Hammetuer so it evens out a bit. But Canes are definitely favourites, home town advantage and they can't keep playing as shit as they have been so far. The Chiefs have played above themselves this year but the Canes should be a class above.

                  "Can't keep playing shit" is one of the more ludicrous reasons to think your team will win.

                  My college team has been shit all year. The good money is that they will continue to be shit, at least till next season. Teams playing badly don't, as a whole, suddenly find their mojo.

                  Unless you think the Hurricanes will go "how stupid of us. We should find our form now."It's It's probably under the bed.

                  If the Hurricanes win, it'll be Barrett magic, rather than suddenly getting good again.

                  How magic was Barrett....

                  Well, I though t it would take positive magic from the Barretts. It instead took negative from the Chiefs halves.

                  But did the Canes suddenly start playing well, like you suggested? Or did they ride intercepts and dropped balls?

                  > Still, I'm sure they can't keep playing this badly. No doubt they'll hit their straps and give the Crusaders a stern lesson.

                  You've done a 360 in the last 24 hours.

                  Chester DrawsC 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • NepiaN Nepia

                    @chester-draws said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                    @bones said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                    @chester-draws said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                    @nepia said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                    @crucial said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                    Chiefs have firm claim to being underdogs..
                    Don’t forget that the Canes ditched the Chiefs coach years ago.

                    They did ditch him for the Hammetuer so it evens out a bit. But Canes are definitely favourites, home town advantage and they can't keep playing as shit as they have been so far. The Chiefs have played above themselves this year but the Canes should be a class above.

                    "Can't keep playing shit" is one of the more ludicrous reasons to think your team will win.

                    My college team has been shit all year. The good money is that they will continue to be shit, at least till next season. Teams playing badly don't, as a whole, suddenly find their mojo.

                    Unless you think the Hurricanes will go "how stupid of us. We should find our form now."It's It's probably under the bed.

                    If the Hurricanes win, it'll be Barrett magic, rather than suddenly getting good again.

                    How magic was Barrett....

                    Well, I though t it would take positive magic from the Barretts. It instead took negative from the Chiefs halves.

                    But did the Canes suddenly start playing well, like you suggested? Or did they ride intercepts and dropped balls?

                    > Still, I'm sure they can't keep playing this badly. No doubt they'll hit their straps and give the Crusaders a stern lesson.

                    You've done a 360 in the last 24 hours.

                    Chester DrawsC Offline
                    Chester DrawsC Offline
                    Chester Draws
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #318

                    @nepia Nope. It was sarcasm.

                    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Chester DrawsC Chester Draws

                      @nepia Nope. It was sarcasm.

                      NepiaN Offline
                      NepiaN Offline
                      Nepia
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #319

                      @chester-draws said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                      @nepia Nope. It was sarcasm.

                      We need a sarcasm button like the spoiler eye.

                      I'd put it around 'Yes, BB's positive magic won the game for the Canes".

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • No QuarterN Offline
                        No QuarterN Offline
                        No Quarter
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #320

                        The Canes won as a result of repeated errors from Weber (in particular) and DMac in the first half undoing the good work of their forwards, and then the Canes pack actually putting in a very good effort in the 2nd 40.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • Chester DrawsC Chester Draws

                          @bones said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                          @chester-draws said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                          @nepia said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                          @crucial said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                          Chiefs have firm claim to being underdogs..
                          Don’t forget that the Canes ditched the Chiefs coach years ago.

                          They did ditch him for the Hammetuer so it evens out a bit. But Canes are definitely favourites, home town advantage and they can't keep playing as shit as they have been so far. The Chiefs have played above themselves this year but the Canes should be a class above.

                          "Can't keep playing shit" is one of the more ludicrous reasons to think your team will win.

                          My college team has been shit all year. The good money is that they will continue to be shit, at least till next season. Teams playing badly don't, as a whole, suddenly find their mojo.

                          Unless you think the Hurricanes will go "how stupid of us. We should find our form now."It's It's probably under the bed.

                          If the Hurricanes win, it'll be Barrett magic, rather than suddenly getting good again.

                          How magic was Barrett....

                          Well, I though t it would take positive magic from the Barretts. It instead took negative from the Chiefs halves.

                          But did the Canes suddenly start playing well, like you suggested? Or did they ride intercepts and dropped balls?

                          Still, I'm sure they can't keep playing this badly. No doubt they'll hit their straps and give the Crusaders a stern lesson.

                          BonesB Offline
                          BonesB Offline
                          Bones
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #321

                          @chester-draws said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                          @bones said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                          @chester-draws said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                          @nepia said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                          @crucial said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

                          Chiefs have firm claim to being underdogs..
                          Don’t forget that the Canes ditched the Chiefs coach years ago.

                          They did ditch him for the Hammetuer so it evens out a bit. But Canes are definitely favourites, home town advantage and they can't keep playing as shit as they have been so far. The Chiefs have played above themselves this year but the Canes should be a class above.

                          "Can't keep playing shit" is one of the more ludicrous reasons to think your team will win.

                          My college team has been shit all year. The good money is that they will continue to be shit, at least till next season. Teams playing badly don't, as a whole, suddenly find their mojo.

                          Unless you think the Hurricanes will go "how stupid of us. We should find our form now."It's It's probably under the bed.

                          If the Hurricanes win, it'll be Barrett magic, rather than suddenly getting good again.

                          How magic was Barrett....

                          Well, I though t it would take positive magic from the Barretts. It instead took negative from the Chiefs halves.

                          But did the Canes suddenly start playing well, like you suggested? Or did they ride intercepts and dropped balls?

                          Still, I'm sure they can't keep playing this badly. No doubt they'll hit their straps and give the Crusaders a stern lesson.

                          Well considering I didn't suggest anything, that might be quite a claim.

                          I'd say they were much better than they have been and that spell of defence prior to half-time was testament to that. If you think they played shit then that's pretty shit.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • SiamS Offline
                            SiamS Offline
                            Siam
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #322

                            What did Fifita do for his yellow and piss Brodie off?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • ToddyT Offline
                              ToddyT Offline
                              Toddy
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #323

                              I think he ran in and pushed somebody over once the scuffle between Cane and Lousi had finished and set it off again. It wasn't needed and he looked more the fool for being binned.

                              It originally started with Cane lying on the ground and twisting Lousi's foot as Lousi was trying to get back onside. Cane becomes pretty niggly when he isn't on form.

                              StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • ToddyT Toddy

                                I think he ran in and pushed somebody over once the scuffle between Cane and Lousi had finished and set it off again. It wasn't needed and he looked more the fool for being binned.

                                It originally started with Cane lying on the ground and twisting Lousi's foot as Lousi was trying to get back onside. Cane becomes pretty niggly when he isn't on form.

                                StargazerS Offline
                                StargazerS Offline
                                Stargazer
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #324

                                @toddy He's always been niggly. It's only more noticeable when he isn't on form because it isn't balanced enough by good stuff.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • antipodeanA Offline
                                  antipodeanA Offline
                                  antipodean
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #325

                                  The French should feel mortified they lost to a team that had that as a first five-eighth. Exactly the sort of game that gives me All Black RWC nightmares.

                                  Y 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • antipodeanA antipodean

                                    The French should feel mortified they lost to a team that had that as a first five-eighth. Exactly the sort of game that gives me All Black RWC nightmares.

                                    Y Offline
                                    Y Offline
                                    Yeahtheboys
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #326
                                    This post is deleted!
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Don't have an account? Register

                                    • Search
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Search