RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C)
-
Could argue thats leading with shoulder too from Tuilagi and in the air...
-
@KiwiMurph So what did he do squat. He certainly went lower at the last minute. What was the tackler supposed to do. Bail out after he already committed. Really?
@Rebound said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):
@KiwiMurph So what did he do squat. He certainly went lower at the last minute. What was the tackler supposed to do. Bail out after he already committed. Really?
Jesus h. Nobody can be that dim to not figure out the tackler can't aim at the top of the shoulders. Well at least I thought that...
-
@Rebound said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):
@MiketheSnow Really correct decision. Farrell fucking ducked right before impact. Wtf must the tackler do, let him fall over the advantage line
Really? What do you think the tackler must do? Is it that hard to figure out?
-
Owens bottles it. Clear cut YC, you are not allowed to tackle the player when he is more than a foot in the air.
-
@Bones Yes it's extremely hard to figure out. This is exactly the same as Sinckler jumping at the last minute for Lions the tackler already committed. The ref cannot say there's no mitigation
@Rebound said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):
@Bones Yes it's extremely hard to figure out. This is exactly the same as Sinckler jumping at the last minute for Lions the tackler already committed. The ref cannot say there's no mitigation
It's ridiculously simple and nothing at all like the sinckler incident.
-
Owens probably got that wrong, but hes had to be fully involved in the first 20 hasn't he. Earning his coin tonight
-
Fuck this Spark Sport keeps crapping out.
-
@canefan said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):
England should take this easy now, but their limited attack game gives Argentina a chance
I reckon their pack will rumble it’s way to victory 8 against 7/
-
If Argie are in touch with ten to go its gunna be a great finish...
-
This is all about World Rugby’s lawyers and the fear of litigation. You can sit around and nod sagely about safety, but they’re not doing this because they care about the players. They’re doing it because they don’t want to be sued. But they’ll destroy the game in the process and piss off the advertisers. When games are wrecked by refereeing decisions you have a dud product. People won’t pay to watch it. I paid a fortune for tickets to the Wales-France semi-final in 2011 and was ropable when Warburton was sent off. There has to be a better system.
-
This is all about World Rugby’s lawyers and the fear of litigation. You can sit around and nod sagely about safety, but they’re not doing this because they care about the players. They’re doing it because they don’t want to be sued. But they’ll destroy the game in the process and piss off the advertisers. When games are wrecked by refereeing decisions you have a dud product. People won’t pay to watch it. I paid a fortune for tickets to the Wales-France semi-final in 2011 and was ropable when Warburton was sent off. There has to be a better system.
@MrDenmore bullshit. That's a red card for as long as I've been playing.
-
England almost as dumb as Australia earlier.
Run them ragged you fucktards.
-
They should be hanging on to possession, not giving it back
-
@MrDenmore bullshit. That's a red card for as long as I've been playing.
-
@MrDenmore said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):
@Bones I don’t care. It’s a stupid system.
Haha sure it is. Lavanini should have been commended.