Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

RWC: England v Australia (QF 1)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
rwcenglandaustralia
706 Posts 68 Posters 48.1k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MiketheSnowM MiketheSnow

    Eddie?

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #601

    @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

    Eddie?

    I think he'd be great

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • NTAN Offline
      NTAN Offline
      NTA
      wrote on last edited by
      #602

      I'd like some sign of reform, in terms of aligning national interests from the professional level up.

      Our depth is still rubbish.

      Cheika has to go for picking Genia if nothing else

      barbarianB antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • barbarianB Offline
        barbarianB Offline
        barbarian
        wrote on last edited by
        #603

        I'm starting to think you might not be a Genia fan, Nick

        NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
        4
        • NTAN NTA

          I'd like some sign of reform, in terms of aligning national interests from the professional level up.

          Our depth is still rubbish.

          Cheika has to go for picking Genia if nothing else

          barbarianB Offline
          barbarianB Offline
          barbarian
          wrote on last edited by
          #604

          @NTA said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

          Our depth is still rubbish.

          In some positions, but not all. Our depth at prop has never been better, and our backrow stocks are good too.

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • MiketheSnowM MiketheSnow

            @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

            @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

            @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

            @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

            @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

            @NTA said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

            Genia was fucking shit this RWC. Has been ever since he got back from France bar a couple of games where he looked better than shit

            Just astonishing that any coach would select a player that so obviously tales time and space away from his team. Especially if you want to start with urgency.

            If you think Genia cost Australia this match perhaps you should heed Darryl Kerrigan's advice

            He certainly didn't add to their attacking repertoire did he?

            Of course.

            If your forwards and backline are consistently getting hit behind the gainline because the halfback is delaying passes, you're not on the road to winning. His play actively hampered the Wallabies. The difference was immediately noticeable when White came on.

            But that's not why Australia lost.

            But feel free to continue this argument of yours that no one else is having.

            ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

            Because the White in shining armour made such a difference

            jeggaJ Offline
            jeggaJ Offline
            jegga
            wrote on last edited by
            #605

            @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

            @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

            @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

            @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

            @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

            @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

            @NTA said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

            Genia was fucking shit this RWC. Has been ever since he got back from France bar a couple of games where he looked better than shit

            Just astonishing that any coach would select a player that so obviously tales time and space away from his team. Especially if you want to start with urgency.

            If you think Genia cost Australia this match perhaps you should heed Darryl Kerrigan's advice

            He certainly didn't add to their attacking repertoire did he?

            Of course.

            If your forwards and backline are consistently getting hit behind the gainline because the halfback is delaying passes, you're not on the road to winning. His play actively hampered the Wallabies. The difference was immediately noticeable when White came on.

            But that's not why Australia lost.

            But feel free to continue this argument of yours that no one else is having.

            ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

            Because the White in shining armour made such a difference

            I doubt Iโ€™m the only one whoโ€™s noticed Aussies wanting White yanked whenhe starts a game so Genia can get the backline moving and the same thing in reverse when Genia starts .

            NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
            4
            • MiketheSnowM MiketheSnow

              @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

              @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

              @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

              @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

              @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

              @NTA said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

              Genia was fucking shit this RWC. Has been ever since he got back from France bar a couple of games where he looked better than shit

              Just astonishing that any coach would select a player that so obviously tales time and space away from his team. Especially if you want to start with urgency.

              If you think Genia cost Australia this match perhaps you should heed Darryl Kerrigan's advice

              He certainly didn't add to their attacking repertoire did he?

              Of course.

              If your forwards and backline are consistently getting hit behind the gainline because the halfback is delaying passes, you're not on the road to winning. His play actively hampered the Wallabies. The difference was immediately noticeable when White came on.

              But that's not why Australia lost.

              But feel free to continue this argument of yours that no one else is having.

              ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

              Because the White in shining armour made such a difference

              antipodeanA Online
              antipodeanA Online
              antipodean
              wrote on last edited by
              #606

              @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

              @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

              @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

              @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

              @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

              @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

              @NTA said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

              Genia was fucking shit this RWC. Has been ever since he got back from France bar a couple of games where he looked better than shit

              Just astonishing that any coach would select a player that so obviously tales time and space away from his team. Especially if you want to start with urgency.

              If you think Genia cost Australia this match perhaps you should heed Darryl Kerrigan's advice

              He certainly didn't add to their attacking repertoire did he?

              Of course.

              If your forwards and backline are consistently getting hit behind the gainline because the halfback is delaying passes, you're not on the road to winning. His play actively hampered the Wallabies. The difference was immediately noticeable when White came on.

              But that's not why Australia lost.

              But feel free to continue this argument of yours that no one else is having.

              ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

              Because the White in shining armour made such a difference

              The fucking irony. Some criticism of Genia and you're running to his rescue. No one said White had a good game, just that he passes quicker from the ruck than Genia does and if you're looking to play with a high tempo as Australia did, that's what you want.

              MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • NTAN NTA

                I'd like some sign of reform, in terms of aligning national interests from the professional level up.

                Our depth is still rubbish.

                Cheika has to go for picking Genia if nothing else

                antipodeanA Online
                antipodeanA Online
                antipodean
                wrote on last edited by
                #607

                @NTA said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                I'd like some sign of reform, in terms of aligning national interests from the professional level up.

                Our depth is still rubbish.

                Losing Kerevi won't help. Two of the three locks from last night as well. There's a paucity of halfbacks too. If Joe Powell is the next best, things aren't so rosy.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • antipodeanA antipodean

                  @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                  @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                  @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                  @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                  @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                  @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                  @NTA said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                  Genia was fucking shit this RWC. Has been ever since he got back from France bar a couple of games where he looked better than shit

                  Just astonishing that any coach would select a player that so obviously tales time and space away from his team. Especially if you want to start with urgency.

                  If you think Genia cost Australia this match perhaps you should heed Darryl Kerrigan's advice

                  He certainly didn't add to their attacking repertoire did he?

                  Of course.

                  If your forwards and backline are consistently getting hit behind the gainline because the halfback is delaying passes, you're not on the road to winning. His play actively hampered the Wallabies. The difference was immediately noticeable when White came on.

                  But that's not why Australia lost.

                  But feel free to continue this argument of yours that no one else is having.

                  ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

                  Because the White in shining armour made such a difference

                  The fucking irony. Some criticism of Genia and you're running to his rescue. No one said White had a good game, just that he passes quicker from the ruck than Genia does and if you're looking to play with a high tempo as Australia did, that's what you want.

                  MiketheSnowM Offline
                  MiketheSnowM Offline
                  MiketheSnow
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #608

                  @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                  @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                  @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                  @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                  @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                  @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                  @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                  @NTA said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                  Genia was fucking shit this RWC. Has been ever since he got back from France bar a couple of games where he looked better than shit

                  Just astonishing that any coach would select a player that so obviously tales time and space away from his team. Especially if you want to start with urgency.

                  If you think Genia cost Australia this match perhaps you should heed Darryl Kerrigan's advice

                  He certainly didn't add to their attacking repertoire did he?

                  Of course.

                  If your forwards and backline are consistently getting hit behind the gainline because the halfback is delaying passes, you're not on the road to winning. His play actively hampered the Wallabies. The difference was immediately noticeable when White came on.

                  But that's not why Australia lost.

                  But feel free to continue this argument of yours that no one else is having.

                  ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

                  Because the White in shining armour made such a difference

                  The fucking irony. Some criticism of Genia and you're running to his rescue. No one said White had a good game, just that he passes quicker from the ruck than Genia does and if you're looking to play with a high tempo as Australia did, that's what you want.

                  Australia lost because in critical situations when players were in space and possession despite Genia's shit service they

                  Lost the ball in contact
                  Lost the ball through poor handling
                  Passed rubbishly to an England player
                  Kicked rubbishly to an England player

                  Australia had more than enough ball and territory to beat England.

                  They fucked up too many chances.

                  antipodeanA taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
                  1
                  • MiketheSnowM MiketheSnow

                    @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                    @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                    @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                    @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                    @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                    @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                    @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                    @NTA said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                    Genia was fucking shit this RWC. Has been ever since he got back from France bar a couple of games where he looked better than shit

                    Just astonishing that any coach would select a player that so obviously tales time and space away from his team. Especially if you want to start with urgency.

                    If you think Genia cost Australia this match perhaps you should heed Darryl Kerrigan's advice

                    He certainly didn't add to their attacking repertoire did he?

                    Of course.

                    If your forwards and backline are consistently getting hit behind the gainline because the halfback is delaying passes, you're not on the road to winning. His play actively hampered the Wallabies. The difference was immediately noticeable when White came on.

                    But that's not why Australia lost.

                    But feel free to continue this argument of yours that no one else is having.

                    ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

                    Because the White in shining armour made such a difference

                    The fucking irony. Some criticism of Genia and you're running to his rescue. No one said White had a good game, just that he passes quicker from the ruck than Genia does and if you're looking to play with a high tempo as Australia did, that's what you want.

                    Australia lost because in critical situations when players were in space and possession despite Genia's shit service they

                    Lost the ball in contact
                    Lost the ball through poor handling
                    Passed rubbishly to an England player
                    Kicked rubbishly to an England player

                    Australia had more than enough ball and territory to beat England.

                    They fucked up too many chances.

                    antipodeanA Online
                    antipodeanA Online
                    antipodean
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #609

                    @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                    @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                    @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                    @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                    @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                    @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                    @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                    @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                    @NTA said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                    Genia was fucking shit this RWC. Has been ever since he got back from France bar a couple of games where he looked better than shit

                    Just astonishing that any coach would select a player that so obviously tales time and space away from his team. Especially if you want to start with urgency.

                    If you think Genia cost Australia this match perhaps you should heed Darryl Kerrigan's advice

                    He certainly didn't add to their attacking repertoire did he?

                    Of course.

                    If your forwards and backline are consistently getting hit behind the gainline because the halfback is delaying passes, you're not on the road to winning. His play actively hampered the Wallabies. The difference was immediately noticeable when White came on.

                    But that's not why Australia lost.

                    But feel free to continue this argument of yours that no one else is having.

                    ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

                    Because the White in shining armour made such a difference

                    The fucking irony. Some criticism of Genia and you're running to his rescue. No one said White had a good game, just that he passes quicker from the ruck than Genia does and if you're looking to play with a high tempo as Australia did, that's what you want.

                    Australia lost because in critical situations when players were in space and possession despite Genia's shit service they

                    Lost the ball in contact
                    Lost the ball through poor handling
                    Passed rubbishly to an England player
                    Kicked rubbishly to an England player

                    Australia had more than enough ball and territory to beat England.

                    They fucked up too many chances.

                    None of which has any relevance to my point.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • barbarianB barbarian

                      I'm starting to think you might not be a Genia fan, Nick

                      NTAN Offline
                      NTAN Offline
                      NTA
                      wrote on last edited by NTA
                      #610

                      @barbarian said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                      I'm starting to think you might not be a Genia fan, Nick

                      He's always talked about as a great halfback, but he hasn't been that for years. Waste of time bringing him back when other development could have been done

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jeggaJ jegga

                        @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                        @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                        @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                        @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                        @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                        @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                        @NTA said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                        Genia was fucking shit this RWC. Has been ever since he got back from France bar a couple of games where he looked better than shit

                        Just astonishing that any coach would select a player that so obviously tales time and space away from his team. Especially if you want to start with urgency.

                        If you think Genia cost Australia this match perhaps you should heed Darryl Kerrigan's advice

                        He certainly didn't add to their attacking repertoire did he?

                        Of course.

                        If your forwards and backline are consistently getting hit behind the gainline because the halfback is delaying passes, you're not on the road to winning. His play actively hampered the Wallabies. The difference was immediately noticeable when White came on.

                        But that's not why Australia lost.

                        But feel free to continue this argument of yours that no one else is having.

                        ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

                        Because the White in shining armour made such a difference

                        I doubt Iโ€™m the only one whoโ€™s noticed Aussies wanting White yanked whenhe starts a game so Genia can get the backline moving and the same thing in reverse when Genia starts .

                        NTAN Offline
                        NTAN Offline
                        NTA
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #611

                        @jegga said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                        @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                        @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                        @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                        @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                        @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                        @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                        @NTA said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                        Genia was fucking shit this RWC. Has been ever since he got back from France bar a couple of games where he looked better than shit

                        Just astonishing that any coach would select a player that so obviously tales time and space away from his team. Especially if you want to start with urgency.

                        If you think Genia cost Australia this match perhaps you should heed Darryl Kerrigan's advice

                        He certainly didn't add to their attacking repertoire did he?

                        Of course.

                        If your forwards and backline are consistently getting hit behind the gainline because the halfback is delaying passes, you're not on the road to winning. His play actively hampered the Wallabies. The difference was immediately noticeable when White came on.

                        But that's not why Australia lost.

                        But feel free to continue this argument of yours that no one else is having.

                        ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

                        Because the White in shining armour made such a difference

                        I doubt Iโ€™m the only one whoโ€™s noticed Aussies wanting White yanked whenhe starts a game so Genia can get the backline moving and the same thing in reverse when Genia starts .

                        Unfortunately that was the story of the lead-in Tests - the starter looked crap because the finisher was fresh.

                        Who'dathunk?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • MiketheSnowM MiketheSnow

                          @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                          @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                          @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                          @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                          @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                          @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                          @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                          @NTA said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                          Genia was fucking shit this RWC. Has been ever since he got back from France bar a couple of games where he looked better than shit

                          Just astonishing that any coach would select a player that so obviously tales time and space away from his team. Especially if you want to start with urgency.

                          If you think Genia cost Australia this match perhaps you should heed Darryl Kerrigan's advice

                          He certainly didn't add to their attacking repertoire did he?

                          Of course.

                          If your forwards and backline are consistently getting hit behind the gainline because the halfback is delaying passes, you're not on the road to winning. His play actively hampered the Wallabies. The difference was immediately noticeable when White came on.

                          But that's not why Australia lost.

                          But feel free to continue this argument of yours that no one else is having.

                          ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

                          Because the White in shining armour made such a difference

                          The fucking irony. Some criticism of Genia and you're running to his rescue. No one said White had a good game, just that he passes quicker from the ruck than Genia does and if you're looking to play with a high tempo as Australia did, that's what you want.

                          Australia lost because in critical situations when players were in space and possession despite Genia's shit service they

                          Lost the ball in contact
                          Lost the ball through poor handling
                          Passed rubbishly to an England player
                          Kicked rubbishly to an England player

                          Australia had more than enough ball and territory to beat England.

                          They fucked up too many chances.

                          taniwharugbyT Offline
                          taniwharugbyT Offline
                          taniwharugby
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #612

                          @MiketheSnow add in played dumb.

                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                            @MiketheSnow add in played dumb.

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Machpants
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #613

                            @taniwharugby said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                            @MiketheSnow add in played dumb.

                            Listen, thatโ€™s the way we play footy, Iโ€™m not going to go to a kick-and-defend game. Call me naive but thatโ€™s not what Iโ€™m going to do,โ€ Cheika said.

                            โ€œIโ€™d rather win it our way or no way. Thatโ€™s the way Aussies want us to play.โ€

                            What a moron, Ozzies want you to win you self centred ego maniac fluffybunny!

                            NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                            5
                            • M Machpants

                              @taniwharugby said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                              @MiketheSnow add in played dumb.

                              Listen, thatโ€™s the way we play footy, Iโ€™m not going to go to a kick-and-defend game. Call me naive but thatโ€™s not what Iโ€™m going to do,โ€ Cheika said.

                              โ€œIโ€™d rather win it our way or no way. Thatโ€™s the way Aussies want us to play.โ€

                              What a moron, Ozzies want you to win you self centred ego maniac fluffybunny!

                              NTAN Offline
                              NTAN Offline
                              NTA
                              wrote on last edited by NTA
                              #614

                              @Machpants win smart. That's what we used to do when our forwards were hanging on by their fingernails.

                              Now we've got a forward pack with a bit of grunt, we're pissing it away

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              5
                              • jeggaJ Offline
                                jeggaJ Offline
                                jegga
                                wrote on last edited by jegga
                                #615

                                alt text
                                https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/rugby-world-cup/rwc-2019-japan/116732031/michael-cheika-quits-as-wallabies-coach-after-rugby-world-cup-exit-to-england

                                Money quote

                                Cheika also said he had "no relationship" with Rugby Australia chief executive Raelene Castle and chairman Cameron Clyne.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • CrucialC Offline
                                  CrucialC Offline
                                  Crucial
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #616

                                  alt text

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  2
                                  • NTAN Offline
                                    NTAN Offline
                                    NTA
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #617

                                    In his defence: Castle and Clyne don't seem to have a relationship with anyone in Rugby.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    5
                                    • antipodeanA Online
                                      antipodeanA Online
                                      antipodean
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #618

                                      I'm sure if they had the cash, they'd have terminated their relationship long ago.

                                      Anyone with a brain would've insisted on KPIs to maintain his job.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • jeggaJ Offline
                                        jeggaJ Offline
                                        jegga
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #619

                                        alt text

                                        alt text

                                        NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • NTAN Offline
                                          NTAN Offline
                                          NTA
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #620

                                          Still got rookie coaches at our provinces.
                                          Club Rugby is barely above Park footy level.
                                          Super squads are going to be tested again with key departures.
                                          U20 players aren't ready.
                                          Delicate time.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search