RWC Final: England v Springboks
-
@TeWaio said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@Billy-Webb said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@kiwiinmelb said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
A bloody interesting stat,
South Africa have never scored a try in a WC final , despite winning 2 .
Another bloody interesting stat:
South Africa have never conceded a try in a RWC final, despite playing in 2.
Not true, 14/15 replay angles showed Cueto scored in 2007 :fishing_pole:
Sorry dude. No he didn't.
@booboo said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@TeWaio said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@Billy-Webb said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@kiwiinmelb said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
A bloody interesting stat,
South Africa have never scored a try in a WC final , despite winning 2 .
Another bloody interesting stat:
South Africa have never conceded a try in a RWC final, despite playing in 2.
Not true, 14/15 replay angles showed Cueto scored in 2007 :fishing_pole:
Sorry dude. No he didn't.
Thanks for prefacing that with an apology
The :fishing_pole: means I was joking, in case that wasn't clear.
-
@booboo said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@TeWaio said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@Billy-Webb said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@kiwiinmelb said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
A bloody interesting stat,
South Africa have never scored a try in a WC final , despite winning 2 .
Another bloody interesting stat:
South Africa have never conceded a try in a RWC final, despite playing in 2.
Not true, 14/15 replay angles showed Cueto scored in 2007 :fishing_pole:
Sorry dude. No he didn't.
Thanks for prefacing that with an apology
The :fishing_pole: means I was joking, in case that wasn't clear.
@TeWaio said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@booboo said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@TeWaio said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@Billy-Webb said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@kiwiinmelb said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
A bloody interesting stat,
South Africa have never scored a try in a WC final , despite winning 2 .
Another bloody interesting stat:
South Africa have never conceded a try in a RWC final, despite playing in 2.
Not true, 14/15 replay angles showed Cueto scored in 2007 :fishing_pole:
Sorry dude. No he didn't.
Thanks for prefacing that with an apology
The :fishing_pole: means I was joking, in case that wasn't clear.
I may not have been in total control of my faculties when I posted that
-
Hoping for the best, fearing the worst!
-
@TeWaio said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@Billy-Webb said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@kiwiinmelb said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
A bloody interesting stat,
South Africa have never scored a try in a WC final , despite winning 2 .
Another bloody interesting stat:
South Africa have never conceded a try in a RWC final, despite playing in 2.
Not true, 14/15 replay angles showed Cueto scored in 2007 :fishing_pole:
Sorry dude. No he didn't.
@booboo said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@TeWaio said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@Billy-Webb said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@kiwiinmelb said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
A bloody interesting stat,
South Africa have never scored a try in a WC final , despite winning 2 .
Another bloody interesting stat:
South Africa have never conceded a try in a RWC final, despite playing in 2.
Not true, 14/15 replay angles showed Cueto scored in 2007 :fishing_pole:
Sorry dude. No he didn't.
It was right in front of me and I saw him step on line. No TMO necessary.
-
Pretty sure I've got a fair idea what the Boks are going to bring - lots of box kicking, attempting to force the mistake - keep it very tight and try to outmuscle and smother the poms.
Less sure what the poms will do - but also probably plenty of kicking but probably a bit more adventure when they've got a territory advantage.
For the Jaapies, I think much depends on them forcing an early mistake and getting a lead. If they can rattle the poms they can potentially squeeze the life out of them.
However, if it's the Jaapies who make the early mistakes and they let the poms get a lead, then they'll be forced to throw caution to the winds. They can actually play expansively, but I don't think they can do it as efficiently as England.
So a foot in each camp that it's not a forgone conclusion - but, I've got the Jaapies winning a nailbiter OR, most likely, England winning pretty comfortably.
Balls on the line England 30-9.
-
My prediction: Boks to win (after extra time) 22-19.
I don't think England will be able to match their performance from the last two weeks and South Africa have more in reserve. Going to be very close and I think SA's better bench and calmer heads will see them home.
-
@Bones said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
How was Farrell gotten more northern since moving south?
All his Northern bretheren around him
-
Go the Boks!
-
-
I was physically sick at this stage before the 2011 and 2015 finals. This time, not so much.
