RWC Final: England v Springboks
-
Wonder what the odds are of Eddie taking a page out of the Italian's playbook and stitching up uncontested scrums?
@PN said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
Wonder what the odds are of Eddie taking a page out of the Italian's playbook and stitching up uncontested scrums?
That would be pretty smart, only one prop away
-
@PN said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
Wonder what the odds are of Eddie taking a page out of the Italian's playbook and stitching up uncontested scrums?
That would be pretty smart, only one prop away
@Kirwan said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@PN said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
Wonder what the odds are of Eddie taking a page out of the Italian's playbook and stitching up uncontested scrums?
That would be pretty smart, only one prop away
Cole to cop an injury? Does test rugby play man off? (I.E. the team that forces uncontested has to play with 14 players)?
-
South Africa have two fresh scrummaging props on the bench as well
-
@Machpants said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@Kirwan said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@MrDenmore said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
The way the All Blacks play is what the market wants to see. This is a dud product.
We won a WC 8-7 so I wouldn’t go too far down that line. Rugby can be trench warfare and be exciting
It wasn't exciting at all. Fucking sucked. I thought I was going to die
2005 Brian O'Driscoll is that you?
@Anonymous said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@Machpants said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@Kirwan said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@MrDenmore said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
The way the All Blacks play is what the market wants to see. This is a dud product.
We won a WC 8-7 so I wouldn’t go too far down that line. Rugby can be trench warfare and be exciting
It wasn't exciting at all. Fucking sucked. I thought I was going to die
2005 Brian O'Driscoll is that you?
Don't you repress my right to identify as a whining Irish fluffybunny
I could've doid!
-
But if Eddie watched our SF he knows SA can be beaten. We should have.
England can.
England need to get tighter not looser.
-
@MrDenmore said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
The way the All Blacks play is what the market wants to see. This is a dud product.
Odd post. Tough physical game that the ground and TV audience are enjoying
Would you call the 2011 final a dud product?
-
@PN said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
Wonder what the odds are of Eddie taking a page out of the Italian's playbook and stitching up uncontested scrums?
That would be pretty smart, only one prop away
-
But if Eddie watched our SF he knows SA can be beaten. We should have.
England can.
England need to get tighter not looser.
@MiketheSnow said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
But if Eddie watched our SF he knows SA can be beaten. We should have.
England can.
England need to get tighter not looser.
SA played within themselves and did enough to win against you. Always in control
-
@MrDenmore said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
The way the All Blacks play is what the market wants to see. This is a dud product.
Go watch league then.
2-all at halftime between NZ and GB
woot. -
@Kirwan said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@PN said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
Wonder what the odds are of Eddie taking a page out of the Italian's playbook and stitching up uncontested scrums?
That would be pretty smart, only one prop away
Cole to cop an injury? Does test rugby play man off? (I.E. the team that forces uncontested has to play with 14 players)?
@Damo said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@Kirwan said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@PN said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
Wonder what the odds are of Eddie taking a page out of the Italian's playbook and stitching up uncontested scrums?
That would be pretty smart, only one prop away
Cole to cop an injury? Does test rugby play man off? (I.E. the team that forces uncontested has to play with 14 players)?
Dunno, but I think they'd do better with 14 and uncontested scrums, than what they're doing ATM
-
@sparky Yes. To you rugby tragics, trench warfare is great. For 80% of the viewing public, they want to see ball movement, sweeping backline moves and tries.
@MrDenmore said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@sparky Yes. To you rugby tragics, trench warfare is great. For 80% of the viewing public, they want to see ball movement, sweeping backline moves and tries.
I disagree that’s what rugby fans want. That’s what you want.
-
@MrDenmore said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
The way the All Blacks play is what the market wants to see. This is a dud product.
Go watch league then.
2-all at halftime between NZ and GB
woot. -
But if Eddie watched our SF he knows SA can be beaten. We should have.
England can.
England need to get tighter not looser.
@MiketheSnow said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
But if Eddie watched our SF he knows SA can be beaten. We should have.
England can.
England need to get tighter not looser.
Eddie spent two and a half years working out how to beat us.
He didn't have time to watch your semifinal!
-
@MrDenmore said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@NTA At least NRL respects the offside line. This is boring
To you, maybe. To millions others it’s a titanic battle.
-
@MiketheSnow said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
But if Eddie watched our SF he knows SA can be beaten. We should have.
England can.
England need to get tighter not looser.
SA played within themselves and did enough to win against you. Always in control
@Kirwan said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@MiketheSnow said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
But if Eddie watched our SF he knows SA can be beaten. We should have.
England can.
England need to get tighter not looser.
SA played within themselves and did enough to win against you. Always in control
And yet we should have been going in to the last two minutes 19-16 ahead.
England are better than Wales.
Go back to basics. Pick & go. Commit and tire the Boks.
Boks will give away penalties.
Kick for territory.
England win.
It's not rocket science.
-
@MrDenmore said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@sparky Yes. To you rugby tragics, trench warfare is great. For 80% of the viewing public, they want to see ball movement, sweeping backline moves and tries.
I disagree that’s what rugby fans want. That’s what you want.
-
@Kirwan said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@MiketheSnow said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
But if Eddie watched our SF he knows SA can be beaten. We should have.
England can.
England need to get tighter not looser.
SA played within themselves and did enough to win against you. Always in control
And yet we should have been going in to the last two minutes 19-16 ahead.
England are better than Wales.
Go back to basics. Pick & go. Commit and tire the Boks.
Boks will give away penalties.
Kick for territory.
England win.
It's not rocket science.
@MiketheSnow said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@Kirwan said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@MiketheSnow said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
But if Eddie watched our SF he knows SA can be beaten. We should have.
England can.
England need to get tighter not looser.
SA played within themselves and did enough to win against you. Always in control
And yet we should have been going in to the last two minutes 19-16 ahead.
England are better than Wales.
Go back to basics. Pick & go. Commit and tire the Boks.
Boks will give away penalties.
Kick for territory.
England win.
It's not rocket science.
Lol. Ok, if my auntie had wheels she’d be a bike.
-
@MrDenmore Lol
-
@MrDenmore said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@Kirwan Rugby is dying and this forward-dominated paint-drying snoozefest isn’t why
No it isn’t.
