Blues v Highlanders
-
Blues will need to rotate somewhat - 3rd straight derby and Highlanders off the bye.
However I would not be throwing Christie into starting just yet. He went very well off the bench so i'd be looking at giving him more bench minutes this week but starting is a different prospect entirely.
I'd be tempted to look at Tolai as bench hooker.
-
@Snowy said in Blues v Highlanders:
Oh, and Honey will be well pissed if we dis the 'Landers and play a B team.
B team?? I suggested two changes.
IMO Barrett to 10 would strengthen the team
-
@Snowy said in Blues v Highlanders:
Oh, and Honey will be well pissed if we dis the 'Landers and play a B team.
B team?? I suggested two changes.
IMO Barrett to 10 would strengthen the team
@Duluth said in Blues v Highlanders:
@Snowy said in Blues v Highlanders:
Oh, and Honey will be well pissed if we dis the 'Landers and play a B team.
B team?? I suggested two changes.
IMO Barrett to 10 would strengthen the team
TBH, I'm not sure it would. Black at 10 and Barrett at 15 with both having input in leading the team around the park seems to work pretty well.
-
Blues will need to rotate somewhat - 3rd straight derby and Highlanders off the bye.
However I would not be throwing Christie into starting just yet. He went very well off the bench so i'd be looking at giving him more bench minutes this week but starting is a different prospect entirely.
I'd be tempted to look at Tolai as bench hooker.
@KiwiMurph I wouldn't mind seeing Tolai get a shot off the bench. Bench hooker and the bench utility(23) would be the obvious spots we can rotate.
Maybe get a specialist loosehead back on the bench? Hodgman had to play 70 minutes last week, probably because they didn't trust Renata to play big minutes at loosehead, although in saying that, Renata's one scrum of the night went pretty well.
Pierce and GCT are probably interchangeable. Maybe give Pierce a chance to see if he can win the bench lock spot off GCT.
-
It has been working pretty well. I think Barrett will have more impact at flyhalf than he's had from fullback so far.
Even if you disagree it's certainly is a valid option for the 'A' side -
@Duluth said in Blues v Highlanders:
@Snowy said in Blues v Highlanders:
Oh, and Honey will be well pissed if we dis the 'Landers and play a B team.
B team?? I suggested two changes.
IMO Barrett to 10 would strengthen the team
TBH, I'm not sure it would. Black at 10 and Barrett at 15 with both having input in leading the team around the park seems to work pretty well.
@Nepia said in Blues v Highlanders:
@Duluth said in Blues v Highlanders:
@Snowy said in Blues v Highlanders:
Oh, and Honey will be well pissed if we dis the 'Landers and play a B team.
B team?? I suggested two changes.
IMO Barrett to 10 would strengthen the team
TBH, I'm not sure it would. Black at 10 and Barrett at 15 with both having input in leading the team around the park seems to work pretty well.
Blues structure improved in the last 20 wth Beaudy at ten, IMO. Not saying Beaudy 10 and ??? 15 would be an improvement, but Beaudy is a big step up over Black - no matter how well he's playing
-
@Snowy said in Blues v Highlanders:
Oh, and Honey will be well pissed if we dis the 'Landers and play a B team.
B team?? I suggested two changes.
IMO Barrett to 10 would strengthen the team
@Duluth said in Blues v Highlanders:
@Snowy said in Blues v Highlanders:
Oh, and Honey will be well pissed if we dis the 'Landers and play a B team.
B team?? I suggested two changes.
Didn't mean you.
Just that wholesale changes probably not a great idea and that if we make them Honey might get upset.
-
@Nepia said in Blues v Highlanders:
@Duluth said in Blues v Highlanders:
@Snowy said in Blues v Highlanders:
Oh, and Honey will be well pissed if we dis the 'Landers and play a B team.
B team?? I suggested two changes.
IMO Barrett to 10 would strengthen the team
TBH, I'm not sure it would. Black at 10 and Barrett at 15 with both having input in leading the team around the park seems to work pretty well.
Blues structure improved in the last 20 wth Beaudy at ten, IMO. Not saying Beaudy 10 and ??? 15 would be an improvement, but Beaudy is a big step up over Black - no matter how well he's playing
@Machpants said in Blues v Highlanders:
Blues structure improved in the last 20 wth Beaudy at ten, IMO. Not saying Beaudy 10 and ??? 15 would be an improvement, but Beaudy is a big step up over Black - no matter how well he's playing
The conundrum there is definitely who we play at 15 isn't as good as Beaudy either.
Perofeta was going O.K but injured. Duffie isn't a threat from the back really, so I understand why Leon is doing it. I've forgotten somebody else at 15...I think.
-
@Duluth said in Blues v Highlanders:
@Snowy said in Blues v Highlanders:
Oh, and Honey will be well pissed if we dis the 'Landers and play a B team.
B team?? I suggested two changes.
Didn't mean you.
Just that wholesale changes probably not a great idea and that if we make them Honey might get upset.
@Snowy said in Blues v Highlanders:
@Duluth said in Blues v Highlanders:
@Snowy said in Blues v Highlanders:
Oh, and Honey will be well pissed if we dis the 'Landers and play a B team.
B team?? I suggested two changes.
Didn't mean you.
Just that wholesale changes probably not a great idea and that if we make them Honey might get upset.
It does raise the issue of depth though. This may not be as long a comp as the usual, but some teams have to deal with some tough runs in the draw.
Saders get 4/4 pattern
Blues get a 3/4/1
Chiefs get 4/4
Canes 2/4/2
Highlanders 1/4/3Highlanders get Blues and Crusaders in consecutive weeks twice.
Somewhere along the line, even discounting injuries, teams are going to have to give some players a rest
-
@Snowy said in Blues v Highlanders:
@Duluth said in Blues v Highlanders:
@Snowy said in Blues v Highlanders:
Oh, and Honey will be well pissed if we dis the 'Landers and play a B team.
B team?? I suggested two changes.
Didn't mean you.
Just that wholesale changes probably not a great idea and that if we make them Honey might get upset.
It does raise the issue of depth though. This may not be as long a comp as the usual, but some teams have to deal with some tough runs in the draw.
Saders get 4/4 pattern
Blues get a 3/4/1
Chiefs get 4/4
Canes 2/4/2
Highlanders 1/4/3Highlanders get Blues and Crusaders in consecutive weeks twice.
Somewhere along the line, even discounting injuries, teams are going to have to give some players a rest
-
@Crucial 4 games then a week off too much for a pro rugby player?
I know it has been bought up for EOYT after a long season but they have had a good break this time.
@Snowy said in Blues v Highlanders:
@Crucial 4 games then a week off too much for a pro rugby player?
I know it has been bought up for EOYT after a long season but they have had a good break this time.
That and it's not test rugby.
You guys should play your B team eh. Hammer will have a plan.
-
@Crucial 4 games then a week off too much for a pro rugby player?
I know it has been bought up for EOYT after a long season but they have had a good break this time.
@Snowy said in Blues v Highlanders:
@Crucial 4 games then a week off too much for a pro rugby player?
I know it has been bought up for EOYT after a long season but they have had a good break this time.
I think RWCs have shown us that you can't expect peak performances 4 games in a row.
Some teams will be OK depending on who they play in that 4th week (eg Blues v Highlanders in week
but it wouldn't surprise me if there aren't some tactical rests, especially from the Crusaders. -
@Machpants said in Blues v Highlanders:
Blues structure improved in the last 20 wth Beaudy at ten, IMO. Not saying Beaudy 10 and ??? 15 would be an improvement, but Beaudy is a big step up over Black - no matter how well he's playing
The conundrum there is definitely who we play at 15 isn't as good as Beaudy either.
Perofeta was going O.K but injured. Duffie isn't a threat from the back really, so I understand why Leon is doing it. I've forgotten somebody else at 15...I think.
@Snowy said in Blues v Highlanders:
Perofeta was going O.K but injured. Duffie isn't a threat from the back really, so I understand why Leon is doing it. I've forgotten somebody else at 15...I think.
Duffie has played around ~35mins over the last couple of weeks. I think he's gone well. My concern is the amount of minutes he has ever played at fullback
-
@Machpants said in Blues v Highlanders:
Blues structure improved in the last 20 wth Beaudy at ten, IMO. Not saying Beaudy 10 and ??? 15 would be an improvement, but Beaudy is a big step up over Black - no matter how well he's playing
The conundrum there is definitely who we play at 15 isn't as good as Beaudy either.
Perofeta was going O.K but injured. Duffie isn't a threat from the back really, so I understand why Leon is doing it. I've forgotten somebody else at 15...I think.
@Snowy said in Blues v Highlanders:
@Machpants said in Blues v Highlanders:
Blues structure improved in the last 20 wth Beaudy at ten, IMO. Not saying Beaudy 10 and ??? 15 would be an improvement, but Beaudy is a big step up over Black - no matter how well he's playing
The conundrum there is definitely who we play at 15 isn't as good as Beaudy either.
Perofeta was going O.K but injured. Duffie isn't a threat from the back really, so I understand why Leon is doing it. I've forgotten somebody else at 15...I think.
Narawa is another FB option.
I might be in the minority with this opinion, but I think Trainor would do alright at 15 in this backline. I think he's a better FB option than Duffie at least.
-
@Snowy said in Blues v Highlanders:
@Machpants said in Blues v Highlanders:
Blues structure improved in the last 20 wth Beaudy at ten, IMO. Not saying Beaudy 10 and ??? 15 would be an improvement, but Beaudy is a big step up over Black - no matter how well he's playing
The conundrum there is definitely who we play at 15 isn't as good as Beaudy either.
Perofeta was going O.K but injured. Duffie isn't a threat from the back really, so I understand why Leon is doing it. I've forgotten somebody else at 15...I think.
Narawa is another FB option.
I might be in the minority with this opinion, but I think Trainor would do alright at 15 in this backline. I think he's a better FB option than Duffie at least.
-
@Dice said in Blues v Highlanders:
I think Trainor would do alright at 15 in this backline
He's been injured hasn't he? I see he played club rugby last weekend
-
@Duluth said in Blues v Highlanders:
@Snowy said in Blues v Highlanders:
Oh, and Honey will be well pissed if we dis the 'Landers and play a B team.
B team?? I suggested two changes.
IMO Barrett to 10 would strengthen the team
TBH, I'm not sure it would. Black at 10 and Barrett at 15 with both having input in leading the team around the park seems to work pretty well.
@Nepia said in Blues v Highlanders:
@Duluth said in Blues v Highlanders:
@Snowy said in Blues v Highlanders:
Oh, and Honey will be well pissed if we dis the 'Landers and play a B team.
B team?? I suggested two changes.
IMO Barrett to 10 would strengthen the team
TBH, I'm not sure it would. Black at 10 and Barrett at 15 with both having input in leading the team around the park seems to work pretty well.
Apologies if it’s already been discussed, And to go with that, is beaudy at 15 the best option for the ABs going forward ?
If it’s a yes , I’m all for him playing 15 at this level
