North vs South
-
@Rebound said in North vs South:
@number9 so it can't be a mail anymore. There has to be opposition part of it to be a maul. Must the defending team be penalised if the attacking team decides to break away
A maul doesn't end because there aren't any more defenders attached.
-
Has Savea done anything all night?
Put a Blues player on in his place.
@antipodean One good tackle, a lot of penalties, slow off the scrum.
-
@antipodean yes it does. That what the law defines a maul
@Rebound said in North vs South:
@antipodean yes it does. That what the law defines a maul
That's how it becomes a maul.
A maul ends and play continues when:
- The ball or ball-carrier leaves the maul.
- The ball is on the ground.
- The ball is on or over the goal line.
-
So you answered your own question. The ball carrier left the maul. Hence those in front of him was offside
@Rebound said in North vs South:
So you answered your own question. The ball carrier left the maul. Hence those in front of him was offside
He was still bound to other players from the maul, so the maul continues.
-
So you answered your own question. The ball carrier left the maul. Hence those in front of him was offside
@Rebound said in North vs South:
So you answered your own question. The ball carrier left the maul. Hence those in front of him was offside
The ball carrier and those bound to him ...therefore still a maul
-
@Rebound said in North vs South:
So you answered your own question. The ball carrier left the maul. Hence those in front of him was offside
He was still bound to other players from the maul, so the maul continues.
@antipodean clearly other players have to include opposition. The definition of a maul can't change midway through a maul
-
@Rebound said in North vs South:
So you answered your own question. The ball carrier left the maul. Hence those in front of him was offside
He was still bound to other players from the maul, so the maul continues.
@antipodean said in North vs South:
@Rebound said in North vs South:
So you answered your own question. The ball carrier left the maul. Hence those in front of him was offside
He was still bound to other players from the maul, so the maul continues.
Correct. Taylor did not peel off on his own, they changed their point of impact.
-
@antipodean clearly other players have to include opposition. The definition of a maul can't change midway through a maul
@Rebound said in North vs South:
@antipodean clearly other players have to include opposition. The definition of a maul can't change midway through a maul
I'm not arguing with you, I'm telling you.
When players of the team who are not in possession of the ball intentionally leave the maul such that there are no players of that team left in the maul, the maul continues.
-
@antipodean clearly other players have to include opposition. The definition of a maul can't change midway through a maul
@Rebound said in North vs South:
@antipodean clearly other players have to include opposition. The definition of a maul can't change midway through a maul
Opposition is only needed to start one, there would be countless examples where one has driven straight through the middle of the opposition...they don’t just stop
-
@Tim not to mention, 2 offside penalties ..and I have question marks about his scrummaging
-
@Rebound said in North vs South:
@antipodean clearly other players have to include opposition. The definition of a maul can't change midway through a maul
I'm not arguing with you, I'm telling you.
When players of the team who are not in possession of the ball intentionally leave the maul such that there are no players of that team left in the maul, the maul continues.
@antipodean said in North vs South:
@Rebound said in North vs South:
@antipodean clearly other players have to include opposition. The definition of a maul can't change midway through a maul
I'm not arguing with you, I'm telling you.
When players of the team who are not in possession of the ball intentionally leave the maul such that there are no players of that team left in the maul, the maul continues.
That is exactly how I saw it.
-
@Rebound said in North vs South:
@antipodean clearly other players have to include opposition. The definition of a maul can't change midway through a maul
I'm not arguing with you, I'm telling you.
When players of the team who are not in possession of the ball intentionally leave the maul such that there are no players of that team left in the maul, the maul continues.
@antipodean the only players intentionally leaving the maul in this case was the team in possession
