Chiefs v Crusaders
-
@Bones when have I steered you wrong?
@taniwharugby said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@Bones when have I steered you wrong?
In this thread!
@No-Quarter yeah I posted up the law. Refs ruling it like forward pass when it's different.
-
@taniwharugby said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@Bones when have I steered you wrong?
In this thread!
@No-Quarter yeah I posted up the law. Refs ruling it like forward pass when it's different.
-
poor old Chiefs...wonder what Gats is gonna talk about this week!
-
Hope tomorrowās game is betterer
@kiwiinmelb said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
Hope tomorrowās game is betterer
Thought this game was fucking Awesome
-
@Bones agree to disagree
@taniwharugby said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@Bones agree to disagree
No, we're supposed to have a punch up. Canterbury rules.
-
@Canes4life said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
Can someone tell me why Cane should be AB captain again? Whitelock has schooled him in this game.
Because he is a certain selection in every team
@kiwiinmelb what makes him a certain selection in each team? Because heās not standing out in any of his games this year, in fact heās probably been outplayed in most of his battles against younger and better players IMO.
-
@gt12 said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
Have you ever seen a side more offside around a ruck?
Well done for getting away with it.
I canāt say anything for the Chiefs offence, there is none.
Well we can Moan about a lot of things the chiefs did in the game and got away with its not going to make the ,
Chiefs any better, you canāt have a whine culture and be a champion side
The Crusaders didnāt whine ABout last week just got on with it.
Maybe there is the differenceK@Chris said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@gt12 said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
Have you ever seen a side more offside around a ruck?
Well done for getting away with it.
I canāt say anything for the Chiefs offence, there is none.
Well we can Moan about a lot of things the chiefs did in the game and got away with its not going to make the ,
Chiefs any better, you canāt have a whine culture and be a champion side
The Crusaders didnāt whine ABout last week just got on with it.
Maybe there is the differenceNails it. It's one thing questioning 50-50 decisions that go against your side. Having a Team Culture that centres around whining is quite another.
-
@taniwharugby said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@Bones agree to disagree
No, we're supposed to have a punch up. Canterbury rules.
-
@kiwiinmelb what makes him a certain selection in each team? Because heās not standing out in any of his games this year, in fact heās probably been outplayed in most of his battles against younger and better players IMO.
@Canes4life said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@kiwiinmelb what makes him a certain selection in each team? Because heās not standing out in any of his games this year, in fact heās probably been outplayed in most of his battles this year.
It was tongue in cheek buddy, they overlooked him in our last important game
-
@taniwharugby said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@Bones when have I steered you wrong?
In this thread!
@No-Quarter yeah I posted up the law. Refs ruling it like forward pass when it's different.
@Bones said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@taniwharugby said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@Bones when have I steered you wrong?
In this thread!
@No-Quarter yeah I posted up the law. Refs ruling it like forward pass when it's different.
Sorry I missed that. Yup amateur hour.
Crusaders too good in the end, but that kind of decision is similar to what drives people crazy when it happens to their team against the ABs. You just can't afford really basic mistakes like that going against you if you want to have a chance, especially when it directly leads to a try.
-
@Bones said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@taniwharugby said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@mariner4life same laws of physics apply
Does it though? What's the law for a knock on...I don't recall it being the same wording as a forward pass.
The law says that if a player knocks it forward he has to catch it again before it hits the ground to avoid a knock on. Kicking it or slapping it back is not a valid way of stopping it being a knock on. And in this case even after he tried to slap it back, the ball still travelled forwards.
The refs absolutely bottled a pretty simple decision.
@No-Quarter my apologies if true! I thought it was fine.
-
@Bones said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@taniwharugby said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@Bones when have I steered you wrong?
In this thread!
@No-Quarter yeah I posted up the law. Refs ruling it like forward pass when it's different.
Sorry I missed that. Yup amateur hour.
Crusaders too good in the end, but that kind of decision is similar to what drives people crazy when it happens to their team against the ABs. You just can't afford really basic mistakes like that going against you if you want to have a chance, especially when it directly leads to a try.
@No-Quarter said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@Bones said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@taniwharugby said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@Bones when have I steered you wrong?
In this thread!
@No-Quarter yeah I posted up the law. Refs ruling it like forward pass when it's different.
Sorry I missed that. Yup amateur hour.
Crusaders too good in the end, but that kind of decision is similar to what drives people crazy when it happens to their team against the ABs. You just can't afford really basic mistakes like that going against you if you want to have a chance, especially when it directly leads to a try.
Also brings into question the supposed intentional knock on by Stevenson. His hand was facing backwards...
