Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusaderschiefs
256 Posts 51 Posters 9.4k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • StargazerS Stargazer

    Haven't read the thread. Some of my 2 cents.

    Geez, that was an exciting, close game! The Chiefs' win throws the comp wide open.
    The only reason the Crusaders are certain of a spot in the final is not their number of competition points, points differential or total of wins, but the fact that the Blues and Chiefs game right at the end of the round robin is likely to knock one of these two out of the Final.

    I held my breath a bit during the first half, when Mo'unga seemed to get injured in a tackle by Vaa'i. He was not well at all, for a while. It wasn't clear on screen, but the radio commentators were talking about it quite a bit. He still played reasonably well after that though, but it seemed a bit with the break on.

    Fainga'anuku failed his HIA and also McLeod was treated for an injury about 5-10 minutes before full time, and not looking good at all. They may need to give Rene Ranger another call ... Brodie McAlister also slightly injured when he left the field. Who's the Crusaders 4th hooker?

    In the mean time, David Havili was massive on defence. 16 tackles made from 16 attempts; only one less than George Bower. Jordan also good (running 132 metres from 7 runs!).

    No doubt, the Crusaders will play their first choice team - as far as available - against the Blues next week.

    Did the Chiefs lose any players to injury? I think they survived this game quite well?

    The Chiefs had 62% of territory and 61% of possession, so it's obvious they didn't have to tackle as much. Ross topped the Chiefs' tackle stats with 10 tackles from 11 attempts.

    Great to see Boshier back. Really making a difference. ALB also had a good game; he was the Chiefs' metre eater with 64 metres from 11 runs.

    As you'll understand, I was quite happy to see Jonah Lowe score his first Super Rugby try. I just saw a tweet saying he's now played more minutes for the Chiefs in SRA, then for the Canes in 3 years. That move to the Chiefs has been great for him. What a difference a coach makes that gives a player a chance!

    After this game, I'm even more keen to see whether an ABs midfield of Havili and ALB would work. In 2016, our post-Nonu/Smith midfield worked best and the midfielders were Crotty and ALB. I think Havili and ALB could work just as well.

    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    wrote on last edited by
    #231

    @stargazer said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    I held my breath a bit during the first half, when Mo'unga seemed to get injured in a tackle by Vaa'i. He was not well at all, for a while. It wasn't clear on screen, but the radio commentators were talking about it quite a bit. He still played reasonably well after that though, but it seemed a bit with the break on.

    Not sure if I am talking abut the same thing here, but there was a ruck 'clean out' on Richie that looked like it hurt him. Pretty sure I heard the crowd gasp at the time. I said to the Mrs I reckon Richie is going to be hurt here but the camera didn't show him for a while after that. It was a flying clean out, that on my one and only look seemed to take his legs out at a great rate of knots. I am amazed his knees survived.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Crazy HorseC Crazy Horse

      @stargazer said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

      I held my breath a bit during the first half, when Mo'unga seemed to get injured in a tackle by Vaa'i. He was not well at all, for a while. It wasn't clear on screen, but the radio commentators were talking about it quite a bit. He still played reasonably well after that though, but it seemed a bit with the break on.

      Not sure if I am talking abut the same thing here, but there was a ruck 'clean out' on Richie that looked like it hurt him. Pretty sure I heard the crowd gasp at the time. I said to the Mrs I reckon Richie is going to be hurt here but the camera didn't show him for a while after that. It was a flying clean out, that on my one and only look seemed to take his legs out at a great rate of knots. I am amazed his knees survived.

      BonesB Offline
      BonesB Offline
      Bones
      wrote on last edited by
      #232

      @crazy-horse said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

      Not sure if I am talking abut the same thing here, but there was a ruck 'clean out' on Richie that looked like it hurt him. Pretty sure I heard the crowd gasp at the time. I said to the Mrs I reckon Richie is going to be hurt here but the camera didn't show him for a while after that. It was a flying clean out, that on my one and only look seemed to take his legs out at a great rate of knots. I am amazed his knees survived.

      Yeah saw that, thought it might get a look by the TMO but seems not. It looked awkward, think Mounga got hit in the shins type area if I recall correctly. Get the feeling it probably looked more illegal than it actually was.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Billy TellB Offline
        Billy TellB Offline
        Billy Tell
        wrote on last edited by
        #233

        Thought the stand out players were backs (ALB, DMac, Jordan) although Jacobsen had a great game.

        Neither grace nor blackadder look like 8s which is a real problem for the crusaders.

        DMac constantly keeps defence guessing and he passes flat was quite impressed tbh.

        Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A ARHS

          Enjoyed being there. Great effort from the Crusaders as major underdogs. Took us to the wire. Only goalkicker accuracy made the difference. So tight.

          BovidaeB Offline
          BovidaeB Offline
          Bovidae
          wrote on last edited by
          #234

          @arhs said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

          Enjoyed being there.

          Yep, the biggest crowd I've seen at the stadium in a long time, even allowing for the club day. Great atmosphere.

          I was worried in the 1st half that the Chiefs would pay for not taking their opportunities when on attack. I also thought the ball-runners were often too static when doing those pick and goes near the line.

          As to the players, one guy who I thought had a huge game and hasn't been mentioned was Ah Kuoi. Tiatia was terrible and looked absolutely gassed (and slow) when chasing back for that kick, before gifting the Crusaders a try with a stupid pass in-goal. He should have been subbed for Wainui, not Lowe, but is obviously a McMillan favourite. Impact off the bench is his lot, but not a starter.

          I read a stat that the Crusaders had only lost 2 of their last 13 away games, both to the Chiefs. Now that becomes 3 losses.

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • Billy TellB Billy Tell

            Thought the stand out players were backs (ALB, DMac, Jordan) although Jacobsen had a great game.

            Neither grace nor blackadder look like 8s which is a real problem for the crusaders.

            DMac constantly keeps defence guessing and he passes flat was quite impressed tbh.

            Crazy HorseC Offline
            Crazy HorseC Offline
            Crazy Horse
            wrote on last edited by
            #235

            @billy-tell said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

            Thought the stand out players were backs (ALB, DMac, Jordan) although Jacobsen had a great game.

            Neither grace nor blackadder look like 8s which is a real problem for the crusaders.

            DMac constantly keeps defence guessing and he passes flat was quite impressed tbh.

            Agree re Jacobsen. He was a pain in the arse all game. Solid running game, some of his ruck work was outstanding and hit hard on defence. He seems very strong in contact.

            It was a weird game in that the Crusaders seemed largely unconcerned about the Chief's attack until the near the end when they gave away a few penalties in a row. As someone mentioned during the game, the Crusaders didn't frequently infringe on their own line for much of the game. I reckon that was a sign they thought they had them under control.

            Did anyone see the offside that the Chief's kicked the winning points from? Not saying it was the wrong call, I just didn't see what the ref was getting at. It was an unusual penalty for any team to give away so softly in that situation.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

              @stargazer said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

              Crusaders

              1 George Bower
              2 Brodie McAlister
              3 Michael Alaalatoa
              4 Mitchell Dunshea
              5 Quinten Strange

              It’s only the Chiefs aye Razor... 😲

              sharkS Offline
              sharkS Offline
              shark
              wrote on last edited by
              #236

              @act-crusader said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

              @stargazer said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

              Crusaders

              1 George Bower
              2 Brodie McAlister
              3 Michael Alaalatoa
              4 Mitchell Dunshea
              5 Quinten Strange

              It’s only the Chiefs aye Razor... 😲

              And we quite rightly paid the price for it. But at least Weber acknowledged they beat the Bs.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • Crazy HorseC Crazy Horse

                Chiefs have a good chance in this one I reckon. They are on a winning run and the Crusaders seem to be in a bit of a trough.

                boobooB Offline
                boobooB Offline
                booboo
                wrote on last edited by
                #237

                @crazy-horse said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                Chiefs have a good chance in this one I reckon. They are on a winning run and the Crusaders seem to be in a bit of a trough.

                Oh how we laughed

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • sparkyS sparky

                  @canerbry said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                  Accuracy seems a bit off for the Crusaders, Mo is missing the timing for some hard runners a bit. A small adjustment and they'll take this Chiefs team apart later in the game.

                  Great prediction there, Nostradamus. πŸ˜‰

                  The Highlanders beating the Blues yesterday, the Chiefs beating the Crusaders today. Great to see the self-appointed Big Two brought down to Earth with a BUMP!

                  sharkS Offline
                  sharkS Offline
                  shark
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #238

                  @sparky said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                  @canerbry said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                  Accuracy seems a bit off for the Crusaders, Mo is missing the timing for some hard runners a bit. A small adjustment and they'll take this Chiefs team apart later in the game.

                  Great prediction there, Nostradamus. πŸ˜‰

                  The Highlanders beating the Blues yesterday, the Chiefs beating the Crusaders today. Great to see the self-appointed Big Two brought down to Earth with a BUMP!

                  You can appoint yourself in the top two when you've won four comps in a row. I'm unsure what the other guy's claim to it is. I think it's a Big One.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                    Is the captains challenge an IRB directive or just NZ (or are Aus using it too)

                    boobooB Offline
                    boobooB Offline
                    booboo
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #239

                    @taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                    Is the captains challenge an IRB directive or just NZ (or are Aus using it too)

                    NZ experiment

                    Dan54D CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • boobooB booboo

                      @taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                      Is the captains challenge an IRB directive or just NZ (or are Aus using it too)

                      NZ experiment

                      Dan54D Offline
                      Dan54D Offline
                      Dan54
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #240

                      @booboo said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                      @taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                      Is the captains challenge an IRB directive or just NZ (or are Aus using it too)

                      NZ experiment

                      And I still wonder what happens in TT comp. Aus don't have it, and they got a few other tricks that we don't have like the 22-50 or whatever it is!

                      StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • boobooB booboo

                        @taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                        Is the captains challenge an IRB directive or just NZ (or are Aus using it too)

                        NZ experiment

                        CrucialC Offline
                        CrucialC Offline
                        Crucial
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #241

                        @booboo said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                        @taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                        Is the captains challenge an IRB directive or just NZ (or are Aus using it too)

                        NZ experiment

                        The experiment has proven that it is a really dumb idea.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        4
                        • Dan54D Dan54

                          @booboo said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                          @taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                          Is the captains challenge an IRB directive or just NZ (or are Aus using it too)

                          NZ experiment

                          And I still wonder what happens in TT comp. Aus don't have it, and they got a few other tricks that we don't have like the 22-50 or whatever it is!

                          StargazerS Offline
                          StargazerS Offline
                          Stargazer
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #242

                          @dan54 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                          @booboo said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                          @taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                          Is the captains challenge an IRB directive or just NZ (or are Aus using it too)

                          NZ experiment

                          And I still wonder what happens in TT comp. Aus don't have it, and they got a few other tricks that we don't have like the 22-50 or whatever it is!

                          As the law trials were only for SRA and SR AU, they won't run during SR T-T, unless the unions - with permission from SANZAAR and WR - decide to continue to use the modified rules for T-T as well. They'd obviously have to specify which rules will be maintained and which won't be.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • P Offline
                            P Offline
                            pakman
                            wrote on last edited by pakman
                            #243

                            Thought Aidan Ross was good. Chiefs had wood on Chch in scrums, but ref pretty disinterested. Big step down at LH from Moody to Bower.

                            Chiefs had watched Southern derby tape, with one off runners angling back towards ruck, or DMac reversing the play and receiver doing that on other side.

                            Result was that Chiefs got a lot of quick ball. Saders couldn' close things down in their usual fashion.

                            Hope you were taking notes, Panadol!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • A Offline
                              A Offline
                              ARHS
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #244

                              Chiefs were on to something with the way McKenzie kept swiftly changing the direction of the attack with sharp flat passes to stretch the defence. It made the defenders work harder than usual.
                              Yes Ah Kuoi had a huge game and Jacobson Ross Taukeiaho and Boshier huge shifts as well.
                              Chiefs just need to address their achilles heel of giving away soft penalties to gift opponents a driving maul 5 to 10 metres out.

                              BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
                                Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
                                Rancid Schnitzel
                                wrote on last edited by Rancid Schnitzel
                                #245

                                Thought DMac was πŸ‘Œat 10. I know he’s had some mares in that position but I’ve always felt he has what it takes to be a very good flyhalf. Hopefully that trend continues.

                                Oh yeah and congrats Chiefs. Gatland is still a cnut though.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                5
                                • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                                  @sparky said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                                  @canerbry said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                                  Accuracy seems a bit off for the Crusaders, Mo is missing the timing for some hard runners a bit. A small adjustment and they'll take this Chiefs team apart later in the game.

                                  Great prediction there, Nostradamus. πŸ˜‰

                                  The Highlanders beating the Blues yesterday, the Chiefs beating the Crusaders today. Great to see the self-appointed Big Two brought down to Earth with a BUMP!

                                  We were underdogs in this match. Did you hear we had an AB prop, lock and centre missing. Did you see our tight 5. Plus we were missing McCaw and Carter.

                                  A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  ARHS
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #246

                                  @act-crusader Tupaea isn't an All Black yet but yes it puts perspective with him Sam Cane Retallick and ONeill and Moli missing and lots of second stringers in there

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  3
                                  • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                                    @sparky said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                                    @canerbry said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                                    Accuracy seems a bit off for the Crusaders, Mo is missing the timing for some hard runners a bit. A small adjustment and they'll take this Chiefs team apart later in the game.

                                    Great prediction there, Nostradamus. πŸ˜‰

                                    The Highlanders beating the Blues yesterday, the Chiefs beating the Crusaders today. Great to see the self-appointed Big Two brought down to Earth with a BUMP!

                                    We were underdogs in this match. Did you hear we had an AB prop, lock and centre missing. Did you see our tight 5. Plus we were missing McCaw and Carter.

                                    A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    ARHS
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #247

                                    @act-crusader said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders

                                    We were underdogs in this match. Did you hear we had an AB prop, lock and centre missing. Did you see our tight 5.

                                    Oops. Just realised you were talking about Crusaders.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      Steven Harris
                                      wrote on last edited by Steven Harris
                                      #248

                                      One of the better games this season in terms of skill and the way the game was officiated ..
                                      I thought the Chiefs were good value for their win and whilst people will point to personal not being available, the Chiefs know all about injuries so we can safely park that one up .

                                      This game reminded me of the Blues encounter at the same venue , with the visitors trying to bully the hosts , but I thought it was the hosts that played all the code , just their own momentum stopping them from either scoring or applying even more pressure..

                                      From 1-8 the chiefs pack were superb , where as the Crusaders pack went in fits and starts , only Tom Sanders really shinning to me and in the backs Jordon and Mounga the only real genuine threats .
                                      Even though the chiefs left it late, I thought the final score actually flattered the visitors ..although I do reckon the Mounga missed conversion from a handy position proved very costly at match ends ..

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      4
                                      • A ARHS

                                        Chiefs were on to something with the way McKenzie kept swiftly changing the direction of the attack with sharp flat passes to stretch the defence. It made the defenders work harder than usual.
                                        Yes Ah Kuoi had a huge game and Jacobson Ross Taukeiaho and Boshier huge shifts as well.
                                        Chiefs just need to address their achilles heel of giving away soft penalties to gift opponents a driving maul 5 to 10 metres out.

                                        BovidaeB Offline
                                        BovidaeB Offline
                                        Bovidae
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #249

                                        @arhs said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

                                        Chiefs just need to address their achilles heel of giving away soft penalties to gift opponents a driving maul 5 to 10 metres out.

                                        In other words, talk to Mitch Brown. πŸ˜‰

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        4
                                        • F Offline
                                          F Offline
                                          Frank
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #250

                                          Thought McKenzie looked good at 10.
                                          His transference was very quick and he changed the angle of attack several times.
                                          There was no Beauden Barrett labored shoveling it on that I saw.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search