Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Wallabies vs France 1

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
australiafrance
392 Posts 39 Posters 16.1k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NTAN NTA

    @mikey07 said in Wallabies vs France 1:

    I went to bed at halftime how did France butcher that winning position.

    By trying to lock out a game from 15-0 up, with 65 minutes to go.

    Oh and this:

    https://twitter.com/CharlieFelix/status/1412741979620864000?s=20

    barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    wrote on last edited by
    #361

    @nta said in Wallabies vs France 1:

    @mikey07 said in Wallabies vs France 1:

    I went to bed at halftime how did France butcher that winning position.

    By trying to lock out a game from 15-0 up, with 65 minutes to go.

    Oh and this:

    https://twitter.com/CharlieFelix/status/1412741979620864000?s=20

    There's a lesson in effort there for young players, look at the actions of Tupou first and then Tate McDermott. Enormous stuff to force the mistake and be in a position to capitalise on it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • barbarianB Offline
      barbarianB Offline
      barbarian
      wrote on last edited by
      #362

      I don't really know what to make of that game, but it was certainly nice to somehow eke out a win in the end.

      When we controlled possession I thought we looked pretty good, but as usual we were let down by a handful of brainsnap errors. Soft dropped balls, terrible kicking, defensive misreads.

      I'll give them a pass for the first game of the season though. We really should have won by 10+ given our dominance of territory, and the amount of clear-cut chances we totally blew.

      NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • barbarianB barbarian

        I don't really know what to make of that game, but it was certainly nice to somehow eke out a win in the end.

        When we controlled possession I thought we looked pretty good, but as usual we were let down by a handful of brainsnap errors. Soft dropped balls, terrible kicking, defensive misreads.

        I'll give them a pass for the first game of the season though. We really should have won by 10+ given our dominance of territory, and the amount of clear-cut chances we totally blew.

        NTAN Offline
        NTAN Offline
        NTA
        wrote on last edited by
        #363

        @barbarian ruck work still not nearly up to this level. Yes it is game 1, but FFS if you're the nearest 2 guys at EVERY level of rugby one of you cleans and one of you bridges.

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • NepiaN Offline
          NepiaN Offline
          Nepia
          wrote on last edited by
          #364

          I don't get the "what a gamble" part of that tweet. Lock trying to win lineout ball in the attacking zone after the buzzer has sounded is a gamble? That's his fucking job.

          KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
          3
          • antipodeanA Online
            antipodeanA Online
            antipodean
            wrote on last edited by
            #365

            If Dupont and Dulin were the last two players to touch the ball instead of those muppets, the Wallabies would've rightly lost.

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • NepiaN Nepia

              I don't get the "what a gamble" part of that tweet. Lock trying to win lineout ball in the attacking zone after the buzzer has sounded is a gamble? That's his fucking job.

              KiwiMurphK Online
              KiwiMurphK Online
              KiwiMurph
              wrote on last edited by
              #366

              @nepia he said the gamble part was Tate McDermott the replacement 9 running down the sideline - not the lock.

              antipodeanA NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                @nepia he said the gamble part was Tate McDermott the replacement 9 running down the sideline - not the lock.

                antipodeanA Online
                antipodeanA Online
                antipodean
                wrote on last edited by antipodean
                #367

                @kiwimurph said in Wallabies vs France 1:

                @nepia he said the gamble part was Tate McDermott the replacement 9 running down the sideline - not the lock.

                What part of that is a gamble? France were hardly going to try going the length of the field.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
                  Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
                  Rancid Schnitzel
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #368

                  Was McDermott allowed to wave his arm like that? Don’t have an issue with it, just didn’t know it was allowed.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                    @nepia he said the gamble part was Tate McDermott the replacement 9 running down the sideline - not the lock.

                    NepiaN Offline
                    NepiaN Offline
                    Nepia
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #369

                    @kiwimurph said in Wallabies vs France 1:

                    @nepia he said the gamble part was Tate McDermott the replacement 9 running down the sideline - not the lock.

                    Ah right, I muddled up the names while watching the vid - I thought the giant lock was McDermott and the halfback had some bogan name like Marshall or Cowan. 😉

                    But, I agree with @antipodean that still, what part of it is a gamble?

                    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • antipodeanA antipodean

                      If Dupont and Dulin were the last two players to touch the ball instead of those muppets, the Wallabies would've rightly lost.

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Derpus
                      wrote on last edited by Derpus
                      #370

                      @antipodean And it Latu, Arnold, Skelton, Kerevi, JOC etc were in the team we would've fucking steamrolled them.

                      Can only play what's there.

                      antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D Derpus

                        @antipodean And it Latu, Arnold, Skelton, Kerevi, JOC etc were in the team we would've fucking steamrolled them.

                        Can only play what's there.

                        antipodeanA Online
                        antipodeanA Online
                        antipodean
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #371

                        @derpus said in Wallabies vs France 1:

                        @antipodean And it Latu, Arnold, Skelton, Kerevi, JOC etc were in the team we would've fucking steamrolled them.

                        Can only play what's there.

                        My point was the Wallabies required an act of self sabotage from a fifth choice halfback and a fullback from ProD2.

                        barbarianB 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A Offline
                          A Offline
                          akan004
                          wrote on last edited by akan004
                          #372

                          The initial error from the French was to not go for a much further kick for touch after they got the penalty at the end. Far less pressure trying to close out a game in your opposition half than in your own. Dumb play.

                          DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • A akan004

                            The initial error from the French was to not go for a much further kick for touch after they got the penalty at the end. Far less pressure trying to close out a game in your opposition half than in your own. Dumb play.

                            DonsteppaD Offline
                            DonsteppaD Offline
                            Donsteppa
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #373

                            @akan004 said in Wallabies vs France 1:

                            The initial error from the French was to not go for a much further kick to touch after they got the penalty at the end. Far less pressure trying to close out a game in your opposition half than in your own. Dumb play.

                            Yep, that was an atrocious kick for touch. Worse than most penalty kicks for touch in League, and that's saying something...

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            3
                            • antipodeanA antipodean

                              @derpus said in Wallabies vs France 1:

                              @antipodean And it Latu, Arnold, Skelton, Kerevi, JOC etc were in the team we would've fucking steamrolled them.

                              Can only play what's there.

                              My point was the Wallabies required an act of self sabotage from a fifth choice halfback and a fullback from ProD2.

                              barbarianB Offline
                              barbarianB Offline
                              barbarian
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #374

                              @antipodean said in Wallabies vs France 1:

                              @derpus said in Wallabies vs France 1:

                              @antipodean And it Latu, Arnold, Skelton, Kerevi, JOC etc were in the team we would've fucking steamrolled them.

                              Can only play what's there.

                              My point was the Wallabies required an act of self sabotage from a fifth choice halfback and a fullback from ProD2.

                              Just nice that another team decided to self-sabotage against us, rather than the flipside which happens far more frequently.

                              antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                              5
                              • O Offline
                                O Offline
                                Old Samurai Jack
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #375

                                Typical first game of the season feel to this game. Thought the Wallabies were surprised by the physical nature of the French but also liked the way the Wallabies attempted to chug it up the middle to try and create space out wide (hope Foster was watching). Is this part of Rennie's plan?
                                Slipper is my favourite Wob. One of the best props who never takes a step backwards.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • NepiaN Nepia

                                  @kiwimurph said in Wallabies vs France 1:

                                  @nepia he said the gamble part was Tate McDermott the replacement 9 running down the sideline - not the lock.

                                  Ah right, I muddled up the names while watching the vid - I thought the giant lock was McDermott and the halfback had some bogan name like Marshall or Cowan. 😉

                                  But, I agree with @antipodean that still, what part of it is a gamble?

                                  nostrildamusN Offline
                                  nostrildamusN Offline
                                  nostrildamus
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #376

                                  @nepia said in Wallabies vs France 1:

                                  @kiwimurph said in Wallabies vs France 1:

                                  @nepia he said the gamble part was Tate McDermott the replacement 9 running down the sideline - not the lock.

                                  Ah right, I muddled up the names while watching the vid - I thought the giant lock was McDermott and the halfback had some bogan name like Marshall or Cowan. 😉

                                  But, I agree with @antipodean that still, what part of it is a gamble?

                                  I did too! I thought he said McDermott was 6 foot nine! Maybe he said 5 foot 9 (that would be closer).

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M mikey07

                                    I went to bed at halftime how did France butcher that winning position.

                                    nostrildamusN Offline
                                    nostrildamusN Offline
                                    nostrildamus
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #377

                                    @mikey07 said in Wallabies vs France 1:

                                    I went to bed at halftime how did France butcher that winning position.

                                    i think they really did tire, weren't so good defensively out wide and the collective Wallabies bench did good for once (how often does that happen?)
                                    Strange game in the end though. The practical, determined, dominant France that started was not the France that ended.

                                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • barbarianB barbarian

                                      @antipodean said in Wallabies vs France 1:

                                      @derpus said in Wallabies vs France 1:

                                      @antipodean And it Latu, Arnold, Skelton, Kerevi, JOC etc were in the team we would've fucking steamrolled them.

                                      Can only play what's there.

                                      My point was the Wallabies required an act of self sabotage from a fifth choice halfback and a fullback from ProD2.

                                      Just nice that another team decided to self-sabotage against us, rather than the flipside which happens far more frequently.

                                      antipodeanA Online
                                      antipodeanA Online
                                      antipodean
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #378

                                      @barbarian said in Wallabies vs France 1:

                                      @antipodean said in Wallabies vs France 1:

                                      @derpus said in Wallabies vs France 1:

                                      @antipodean And it Latu, Arnold, Skelton, Kerevi, JOC etc were in the team we would've fucking steamrolled them.

                                      Can only play what's there.

                                      My point was the Wallabies required an act of self sabotage from a fifth choice halfback and a fullback from ProD2.

                                      Just nice that another team decided to self-sabotage against us, rather than the flipside which happens far more frequently.

                                      I think the real positives are the backrow combination looks willing and balanced. And ample evidence that Test rugby really is beyond Banks and Gordon.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • KiwiMurphK Online
                                        KiwiMurphK Online
                                        KiwiMurph
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #379

                                        https://twitter.com/samphillips06/status/1412945924335095811

                                        NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                                          https://twitter.com/samphillips06/status/1412945924335095811

                                          NTAN Offline
                                          NTAN Offline
                                          NTA
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #380

                                          @kiwimurph I don't get the "Main Channel" argument - GEM is serving HD content into basically everywhere and SD if you live in the sticks.

                                          Maybe because I just watch streaming via Stan :man_shrugging:

                                          KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search