Wallabies v France 3
-
How do 3 officials miss an obvious knock on ..but can still come up with such a crap decision after having 5 minute Spanish Inquisition over a red card ..?
-
Aus are a much better side with tate McDermott starting
-
@canes4life he wasn’t falling though. It’s not hard for Marika to eliminate the risk by going for the hips/legs.
@act-crusader his head was coming down. Anyway who cares about the slow motion replay, I think that’s where the refs get it so wrong, there is no factoring in that players literally have a split second to make a decision. Because there was no malice it should no way be a red card. Penalty at the very most IMO.
-
How do 3 officials miss an obvious knock on ..but can still come up with such a crap decision after having 5 minute Spanish Inquisition over a red card ..?
@steven-harris said in Wallabies v France 3:
How do 3 officials miss an obvious knock on ..but can still come up with such a crap decision after having 5 minute Spanish Inquisition over a red card ..?
Because it’s O’Keefe and Pickerall involved Muppetts.
-
@toddy every day of the week ,cynical side entry
-
How do 3 officials miss an obvious knock on ..but can still come up with such a crap decision after having 5 minute Spanish Inquisition over a red card ..?
@steven-harris said in Wallabies v France 3:
How do 3 officials miss an obvious knock on ..but can still come up with such a crap decision after having 5 minute Spanish Inquisition over a red card ..?
They didn’t miss it, they came back.
And the red card was a correct call under the current laws.
-
Stupid commentator. First question is about the Marika penalty.
-
@chris said in Wallabies v France 3:
McDermott is a massive step up from Gordon.
Overall but also thrown a couple of serious Hospital passes
@nta said in Wallabies v France 3:
@chris said in Wallabies v France 3:
McDermott is a massive step up from Gordon.
Overall but also thrown a couple of serious Hospital passes
Creates though, Gordon is ponderous behind the pack.
-
@steven-harris said in Wallabies v France 3:
How do 3 officials miss an obvious knock on ..but can still come up with such a crap decision after having 5 minute Spanish Inquisition over a red card ..?
They didn’t miss it, they came back.
And the red card was a correct call under the current laws.
-
@act-crusader his head was coming down. Anyway who cares about the slow motion replay, I think that’s where the refs get it so wrong, there is no factoring in that players literally have a split second to make a decision. Because there was no malice it should no way be a red card. Penalty at the very most IMO.
@canes4life said in Wallabies v France 3:
@act-crusader his head was coming down. Anyway who cares about the slow motion replay, I think that’s where the refs get it so wrong, there is no factoring in that players literally have a split second to make a decision. Because there was no malice it should no way be a red card. Penalty at the very most IMO.
There is no leeway for being reckless.
The main problem is the lack of the 20 minute red card.
-
@kirwan but in real time the knock on was so obvious
@steven-harris said in Wallabies v France 3:
@kirwan but in real time the knock on was so obvious
It’s BOK, of course he missed in real time.
